Bluemoon4610 wrote:zuricity wrote:So the Rags, Scouse2 and Spuds were behind this.
Not the big six or eight.
Dock all three 30 points. let them get relegated.
Where have you seen spuds behind it? Just read an article that named some Chelski execs in the discussions but not seen any talk of Spurs......
A BBC article , this morning.
Nice to see David Bernstein coming out against this and to even Identify the need for Parliament to get involved.
Over many , many decades Professional Football has gone from a "Collective" to an "Enterprise".
Today there are so many things going on - on a playing field that isn't level .
For example . The BBC receives license money and is not allowed to advertise . OK . Netflix receives "license money" and doesn't advertise.
Sky receives license money ( Subscriptions ) and does advertise . Totally inconsistent.
Let's just say the BBC had been converted some years ago to a non-fee based Corporation, with the experience , massive vault of Creative works, dramas etc behind it. It would be the perfect candidate for beaming sport and Football especially around the world. Rather than those weasels that no longer work for Murdoch.
I'm basically saying , if SKY want to send me adverts then there should be no subscription , also i should be able to pick any of the games to watch on TV.
Also, all games should be a sellout before they are allowed to be televised live. ( sell out - perhaps more 80 percent capacity filled ? you know what i mean).
Another thing i don't get is , why good reporters aren't hounding the likes of Parry all day long to ask him the questions and demand answers to questions that , for example have been raised in this Thread ?