stupot wrote:carl_feedthegoat wrote:stupot wrote:carl_feedthegoat wrote:blues-clues wrote:Micah is only there to provide some balance to Shearer and Lineker and to help "meet the quotas". Even the bluest blue wont expect a great deal of in depth insight from him. It's nice to have at least one punter who is always shouting for us even if he is a bit cringworthy at times.
Look no further than Trevor Sinclair for defending us against the haters - he doesn't shout and laugh like a demented donkey but gives a good analysis of how we play etc.
He also thinks Sterling is World Class so I wouldn't take too much of what he says as gospel.
Just because he thinks Sterling is world class ? Most fans do think he’s world class , as do foreign fans.
When it comes to football análisis he’s far and away better et it than Micah.
Most fans don't think he's world class and most City fans who watch all our games definitely don't think he is.
I like listening to Sinclair, he defends us against the 2 haters White and Jordan very well but I don't think his analysis is any better than Micah Richards- he just doesn't do the stupid laugh.
They're both clowns, mainly Richards. Richards is just a TV puppet at times find really irritating if not embarrassing. Sinclair, although his heart is in the right place, just doesn't have the nous to take on the two monkeys; delboy Jordan and that alchi jockey sky reject. Anyone with a decent vocabulary should be able to trounce them. Then again, most of the ex footballers on talk sport are lacking. I'd say Vincent kompany would have been the ideal candidate. Nedum Onuha is well spoken, doesn't stutter with his words and presents well, whether you agree with him or not that's a different matter.
