FFP is it still here

[stevefromdonny]

can some1 explain to me, utd shelling out over 200 mil plus chelsea the same and not 1 peep about FFP
now i know some will say if it was us they would, but no way as utd and chelsea got that much money to spend with money going in
so is there a relaxing of FFP after the covid and no money going in

[john@staustell]

https://www.skysports.com/football/news ... ed-to-know

Clear as mud. The Premier League one is just about us, so that doesn't matter

[Bluemoon4610]

https://www.skysports.com/football/news/11095/12584543/uefas-new-financial-sustainability-regulations-to-replace-ffp-all-you-need-to-know

Clear as mud. The Premier League one is just about us, so that doesn't matter

"UEFA's first financial regulations, introduced in 2010, served its primary purpose. They helped pull European football finances back from the brink" says Ceferin.

How's that working for Uefalona, Mr Ceferin?

[Dimples]

FFP is a total farce not to be taken seriously.
Let the club deal with it. I don't waste time reading ambiguous rubbish spouted by UEFA.

It is just a tool devised to ensure the cartel clubs kept all the riches for themselves.
It appears to have failed because City and PSG have forced their way in and it looks like it is not going to stop Newcastle.

Stupid rhetoric using like words like tradition, history, legacy, organic growth and sustainable used to describe a system that enables Barcelona
to buy whoever they want after having gone bust (by gambling their future)?
Lets Chelsea and MU spend £200M each this transfer window despite them having debts of $1.8B and $500M?

Bottom line for me is that when push came to shove, City launched a legal challenge and won.
I am guessing with the leverage they are giving to the cartel clubs (MU, Barca, Chelsea) it would be impossible for a legal case against
a non-compliant club to stand up in court?

PSG are a good example of that. They seem to do what they want and UEFA cannot stop them.