Players shouldn't be paid when they are banned?

Here is the place to talk about all things city and football!

Players shouldn't be paid when they are banned?

Postby paulmclaren » Fri Feb 26, 2010 11:02 am

Anyone agree with this?
Seen how now we have lost Vieira and Ade to longish suspensions.
Were a bit thin on the ground now.
Yet i bet they get fully paid when they are banned?
Why should they get paid?
They will not learn this way.
I think that whenever a player coach or otherwise is banned.
They should not be paid for the duration of the ban?
Fair?
I think so.
They might actually learn something then.
User avatar
paulmclaren
De Jong's Tackle
 
Posts: 1486
Joined: Wed Nov 05, 2008 5:07 pm
Supporter of: Manchester city f.c
My favourite player is: Carlos Tevez

Re: Players shouldn't be paid when they are banned?

Postby Original Dub » Fri Feb 26, 2010 11:25 am

paulmclaren wrote:Anyone agree with this?
Seen how now we have lost Vieira and Ade to longish suspensions.
Were a bit thin on the ground now.
Yet i bet they get fully paid when they are banned?
Why should they get paid?
They will not learn this way.
I think that whenever a player coach or otherwise is banned.
They should not be paid for the duration of the ban?
Fair?
I think so.
They might actually learn something then.


I wouldn't fine
Adebayor
Over 400k
For something
That looked to me
Like a challenge
That can happen
Several times in most matches
Original Dub
 

Re: Players shouldn't be paid when they are banned?

Postby BlueinBosnia » Fri Feb 26, 2010 11:25 am

So a full back will pull out of tackles to avoid the five yellows and a suspension?
Great idea.
Clubs can give their own punishment for violent conduct.
Like with Ben Thatcher.
"Ferguson. Žvaka kurac."
(Ferguson. Chewing-gum cock.)
Old man in a bar in rural Bosnia.
User avatar
BlueinBosnia
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Paul Power's Tash
 
Posts: 10636
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 3:43 pm
Location: Sarajevo, BiH
Supporter of: Team Bridge

Re: Players shouldn't be paid when they are banned?

Postby CityGer » Fri Feb 26, 2010 11:29 am

Some merit in the theory, would depend entirely on the circumstances. Using the two you mention as an exaple, Vieira doesn't deserve a fucking penny until he is available for selection where as a fine for Ade would be extremely harsh.
we've got love bites and everything
Image
User avatar
CityGer
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
David Silva's Silky Skills
 
Posts: 6572
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2007 7:07 pm
Location: Linlithgow - via Ardwick
Supporter of: us

Re: Players shouldn't be paid when they are banned?

Postby paulmclaren » Fri Feb 26, 2010 6:48 pm

CityGer wrote:Some merit in the theory, would depend entirely on the circumstances. Using the two you mention as an exaple, Vieira doesn't deserve a fucking penny until he is available for selection where as a fine for Ade would be extremely harsh.

I've not seen the ade inncident.
From what everyone has said on here it sounds like it didn't warrant a 1 match ban never mind 4.
User avatar
paulmclaren
De Jong's Tackle
 
Posts: 1486
Joined: Wed Nov 05, 2008 5:07 pm
Supporter of: Manchester city f.c
My favourite player is: Carlos Tevez

Re: Players shouldn't be paid when they are banned?

Postby sandman » Fri Feb 26, 2010 6:52 pm

paulmclaren wrote:
CityGer wrote:Some merit in the theory, would depend entirely on the circumstances. Using the two you mention as an exaple, Vieira doesn't deserve a fucking penny until he is available for selection where as a fine for Ade would be extremely harsh.

I've not seen the ade inncident.
From what everyone has said on here it sounds like it didn't warrant a 1 match ban never mind 4.


It didnt warrant a free kick!!
User avatar
sandman
Rosler's Grandad Bombed The Swamp
 
Posts: 3552
Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2005 7:34 pm
Supporter of: City


Return to The Maine Football forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot] and 179 guests