Wooders wrote:Its a shame as he could be fucking good in this team
I aree, it's a pity he's a lazy little shit because with just a little bit of effort he could be sensational.
Wooders wrote:Its a shame as he could be fucking good in this team
Ted Hughes wrote:Wooders wrote:Its a shame as he could be fucking good in this team
I aree, it's a pity he's a lazy little shit because with just a little bit of effort he could be sensational.
BlueMoonAwoken wrote:Ted Hughes wrote:Wooders wrote:Its a shame as he could be fucking good in this team
I aree, it's a pity he's a lazy little shit because with just a little bit of effort he could be sensational.
I think he would be a weak link to be honest, you cant play him on the left because kolarov would look as bad as bridge. he would have to take tevez's place and i couldnt see that happening in a million years. If you hit him hard early on he will shy away from the game.
Ted Hughes wrote:BlueMoonAwoken wrote:Ted Hughes wrote:Wooders wrote:Its a shame as he could be fucking good in this team
I aree, it's a pity he's a lazy little shit because with just a little bit of effort he could be sensational.
I think he would be a weak link to be honest, you cant play him on the left because kolarov would look as bad as bridge. he would have to take tevez's place and i couldnt see that happening in a million years. If you hit him hard early on he will shy away from the game.
Some of the systems Mancini uses will try to allow for less workrate from the forwards by having a more solid midfield covering, like Dunga's system for Brazil. Balotelli, when used in that left side position isn't famed for his tracking back (although he may hopefully be talked into it & surprise us) & Silva isn't exactly Roy Keane either..
BlueMoonAwoken wrote:Ted Hughes wrote:BlueMoonAwoken wrote:Ted Hughes wrote:Wooders wrote:Its a shame as he could be fucking good in this team
I aree, it's a pity he's a lazy little shit because with just a little bit of effort he could be sensational.
I think he would be a weak link to be honest, you cant play him on the left because kolarov would look as bad as bridge. he would have to take tevez's place and i couldnt see that happening in a million years. If you hit him hard early on he will shy away from the game.
Some of the systems Mancini uses will try to allow for less workrate from the forwards by having a more solid midfield covering, like Dunga's system for Brazil. Balotelli, when used in that left side position isn't famed for his tracking back (although he may hopefully be talked into it & surprise us) & Silva isn't exactly Roy Keane either..
I think milner will play that left hand hand side from now on, if ballotelli plays it will be up top with tevez, silva through the middle or in place of tevez. thats just what i think but im probably wrong.
Ted Hughes wrote:Just a thought but it's not impossible we could take Huntellaar for Robinho. I'm not a fan but having a spare goalscorer is better than having someone who doesn't like us.
Ted Hughes wrote:Galliani said: 'Robinho is the alternative to Ibrahimovic, but we want the Swedish striker.'
Reports in Italy have say that Milan director Ariedo Braida has flown in to England as they look to reach an agreement with City for a player who has fallen from grace since a British record £32.5m move from Real Madrid in September 2008.
Robinho may need to take a pay cut on his £160,000 a week deal to secure a move away from Eastlands.
No deal: Galliani leaves talks at Barca
On Ibrahimovic, Galliani admitted: 'The negotiations are very complex, very difficult, very expensive, but the relationship with Sandro Rosell is really good and he is very nice.
'The will of Barcelona is to sell the player to Milan. There is a lot of money to overcome and this is the difficulty.'
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/footba ... z0xjBPZs3w
These fucks are at it again; try to get an agreement with the player & force the club to sell him for less money whilst fucking us about at the same time. Just a thought but it's not impossible we could take Huntellaar for Robinho. I'm not a fan but having a spare goalscorer is better than having someone who doesn't like us.
CityFanFromRome wrote:Ted Hughes wrote:Just a thought but it's not impossible we could take Huntellaar for Robinho. I'm not a fan but having a spare goalscorer is better than having someone who doesn't like us.
Huntelaar's stats both in Spain and Italy show he's not that good of a goalscorer when put in a serious league though. I'd prefer selling Robinho for all cash and then flying to Germany to get Dzeko.
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], ian494, Majestic-12 [Bot], Paul68, stupot, trueblue64 and 330 guests