"There is only one Sheikh Mansour"

Here is the place to talk about all things city and football!

"There is only one Sheikh Mansour"

Postby Michigan Blue » Sat Oct 09, 2010 10:28 pm

Broughton 'scoured the world' for sugar daddy
By Harry Harris, Football Correspondent
October 9, 2010


Liverpool chairman Martin Broughton has revealed that he "scoured the world" in search of a sugar daddy owner in the mould of Roman Abramovich and Sheikh Mansour bin Zayed al-Nahyan but failed to find one.

While a section of Liverpool fans are concerned it will be a case of out of the frying pan into the fire by swapping one set of American owners with another, Broughton attempts to ease their worries in an exclusive interview with ESPNsoccernet while away in the States.

Instead of a billionaire, Liverpool will have a few multi-millionaires, and in the financially-competitive Premier League there is some scepticism about the men who own Boston Red Sox, New England Sports Ventures.

From his Washington hotel, Broughton told ESPNsoccernet that it might turn out to be better in the long run.

Broughton explained: "We searched the world looking for another owner like the ones at Chelsea and Manchester City. With all of Liverpool's traditions, heritage, history and powerful global brand, I must admit I thought it would be possible to find one.

"We hoped for someone who wanted a 'trophy asset', but having scoured the world without finding one, the conclusion is that there are no more Romans out there.

"Yes, of course, it is disappointing that even a name like Liverpool failed to attract one, so I cannot imagine other club having much luck."


I suggested to Broughton that it is very optimistic to believe that there are sugar daddies queueing up to buy Premier League clubs, when in reality that is not the case. The majority of Premier League clubs would leap at the chance of a takeover, and Liverpool at last have one, while many are still waiting in hope to clear their debts.

Broughton said: "Yes, everyone is aware of how many Premier League clubs there are for sale, but Liverpool is different, at least it should have been different, as it is a global brand compared to some of the other clubs, and for that reason you would have thought it would have appealed to a sugar daddy.

"But the truth is that there is only one Roman Abramovich, there is only one Sheikh Mansour, because we couldn't find another one."


Chelsea cost their Russian owner less than £70 million, taking control with a £17 million buyout of Ken Bates, although he invested half a billion from that point. It was the same at Manchester City, where there wasn't a premium price tag.

Broughton added: "With Liverpool, whatever the price to buy it, came a heavy obligation to spend something like £300 million on a new stadium, and £350 million of debt or an obligation to turn that into equity. Liverpool came with some heavy numbers, whereas Abramovich paid very little to gain control of Chelsea.

"So no matter how far and wide we looked there was no evidence of a sugar daddy type around.

"Perhaps it will end up being to our advantage, when the financial fair play rules apply in 2013, we will have the ideal owners in a way, owners who understand the commercial realities of a running a club and running a sporting team, and how to invest in the team, and produce a winning team.

"More reality will come in to football, and it is important that our supporters take this aspect on board. Put Manchester City to one side, and how many big money transfers were there this summer? Not that many. Reality is setting in across the board."
"Certainly our programme is a full one, but as a player and as a manager I've always felt that there is only one way to go into a season...and that's to try to win every game.... While we are in four major competitions we shall try to win four major competitions." - Joe Mercer
User avatar
Michigan Blue
Balotelli's Fireworks Party
 
Posts: 882
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:45 pm
Location: Michigan, USA
Supporter of: Manchester City

Re: "There is only one Sheikh Mansour"

Postby ryanmjo » Sat Oct 09, 2010 10:50 pm

Harry Harris is a terrible terrible journalist. This story seems legitimate, but I just wanted to put that out there.
ryanmjo
Tevez's Golfing Holiday
 
Posts: 710
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 6:18 pm

Re: "There is only one Sheikh Mansour"

Postby ronk » Sat Oct 09, 2010 11:30 pm

Broughton doesn't come across at all well. Funny how he might be being seen by Liverpool fans as a hero when he comes across as someone lacking in the vision necessary to do his job.
“Do onto others — then run!”
B. Hill
User avatar
ronk
Shaun Goater's 103 Goals
 
Posts: 7501
Joined: Thu May 18, 2006 12:23 am
Location: Dublin

Re: "There is only one Sheikh Mansour"

Postby Blue in the face » Sat Oct 09, 2010 11:49 pm

Theres bound to be some more Arabs out there wanting to buy a premiership club. Not Liverpool though.

I fear they may be waiting for the scum. Only an Arab could afford to bail them out.
Image
User avatar
Blue in the face
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
De Jong's Tackle
 
Posts: 1823
Joined: Fri Dec 19, 2008 11:32 pm
Location: Belfast
Supporter of: City
My favourite player is: Zabba

Re: "There is only one Sheikh Mansour"

Postby M147WN » Sun Oct 10, 2010 12:04 am

Blue in the face wrote:Theres bound to be some more Arabs out there wanting to buy a premiership club. Not Liverpool though.

I fear they may be waiting for the scum. Only an Arab could afford to bail them out.


Would a neighbouring Arab country go head to head against our man? Astute as these people are in business it would mean trying to build a team to rival whats happened to us over the past 2 years and what will enevitably continue until we acheive sucess and then consolidate to be one of the worlds big players.
I think it would not be a wise decision on another Arab countries part to take on the sheik, as to be seen to fail would only bring embarrasment and I can't see our man backing down on anything.
Image

I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal labotomy!
User avatar
M147WN
Richard Dunne's Own Goals
 
Posts: 991
Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2007 6:28 am
Location: Poynton

Re: "There is only one Sheikh Mansour"

Postby Michigan Blue » Sun Oct 10, 2010 1:42 am

Maybe it's just wishful thinking, but I'm inclined to believe Broughton. There is practically no-one out there willing to plunge a billion pounds cash into a football club. Fewer still who would do so just to meet asking prices, clear debts, build a modern stadium, etc.

There are probably a few clubs who are both relatively affordable and have the stadium and support in place to rival us, but with the financial fair play rules kicking in soon, they will not have time to splash out for a Champions League quality squad the way we have.

I do find it amusing that we're ruining football, yet "England's most illustrious club" wandered around the world, cap in hand, trying to find an owner just like ours.

Glad they failed.
"Certainly our programme is a full one, but as a player and as a manager I've always felt that there is only one way to go into a season...and that's to try to win every game.... While we are in four major competitions we shall try to win four major competitions." - Joe Mercer
User avatar
Michigan Blue
Balotelli's Fireworks Party
 
Posts: 882
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:45 pm
Location: Michigan, USA
Supporter of: Manchester City

Re: "There is only one Sheikh Mansour"

Postby Dingus McDouchey » Sun Oct 10, 2010 1:51 am

Michigan Blue wrote:I do find it amusing that we're ruining football, yet "England's most illustrious club" wandered around the world, cap in hand, trying to find an owner just like ours.


AMEN x 1,000,000,000
Berbatov wins golden boot, spends following season on the bench while his team loses title on goal difference. Well played, Fergie.
User avatar
Dingus McDouchey
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Richard Dunne's Own Goals
 
Posts: 928
Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2007 9:36 pm

Re: "There is only one Sheikh Mansour"

Postby Dameerto » Sun Oct 10, 2010 8:24 am

I doubt there's a lack of people who would like to (and are financially able to) buy Liverpool - it's down to bad (or good, from everyone else's point of view) timing with the new rules coming into effect soon. Once the rules have failed and/or been heavily re-written or scrapped someone will be more likely to get involved in the Prem.
VIVA EL CITIES

"The adjudicatory chamber of the Ethics Committee ... has banned Mr Joseph S. Blatter ... for eight years and Mr Michel Platini ... for eight years from all football-related activities (administrative, sports or any other) on a national and international level. The bans come into force immediately." - 21/12/2015
User avatar
Dameerto
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Allison's Big Fat Cigar
 
Posts: 18703
Joined: Mon Jun 22, 2009 7:08 pm
Supporter of: El City
My favourite player is: Sergio Forwardo

Re: "There is only one Sheikh Mansour"

Postby Fish111 » Sun Oct 10, 2010 8:39 am

Made me laugh the other day when i heard a bin-dipper saying that he'd be embarrassed if they were bought by billionaires and they started throwing money at the club. No you wouldn't you daft scouse twat. You'll be even more embarrassed when your mid-table for the next ten years and the memory of past glorys will fade into insignifcance.
User avatar
Fish111
Rosler's Grandad Bombed The Swamp
 
Posts: 3999
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2008 7:09 pm
Supporter of: The Citizens
My favourite player is: Bell & Silva

Re: "There is only one Sheikh Mansour"

Postby Bluez » Sun Oct 10, 2010 10:15 am

With teh new fair play rules what good would it do anyway? the days of new owners splasing the cash are supposedly over.

On a similar note, as UEFA have been talking about how clubs cannot remove historical spending in one year to get around the rules, if the new owner comes in and wipes out Liverpools debt, isn't that the new owner paying off past spending in one go? How would the fair play rules see that?
Light travels faster than sound.
Thats why some people appear bright until they open their mouth.

DISCLAIMER- My views are mine alone, and probably rubbish anyway.
User avatar
Bluez
Joe Hart's 29 Clean Sheets
 
Posts: 5436
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2005 1:16 pm
Location: On the Edge of Insanity

Re: "There is only one Sheikh Mansour"

Postby Slim » Sun Oct 10, 2010 10:21 am

Bluez wrote:With teh new fair play rules what good would it do anyway? the days of new owners splasing the cash are supposedly over.

On a similar note, as UEFA have been talking about how clubs cannot remove historical spending in one year to get around the rules, if the new owner comes in and wipes out Liverpools debt, isn't that the new owner paying off past spending in one go? How would the fair play rules see that?


This only affects teams in European competitions, not ones in the Championship.
Image
User avatar
Slim
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 30344
Joined: Mon Mar 06, 2006 3:57 am
Location: Perth

Re: "There is only one Sheikh Mansour"

Postby ashton287 » Sun Oct 10, 2010 12:03 pm

They use the words "sugar daddy" far too much for my liking in that piece.
[center]Image[/center]
User avatar
ashton287
De Jong's Tackle
Joe Hart's 29 Clean Sheets
 
Posts: 5071
Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2009 11:02 am
Location: Manchester
Supporter of: Manchester City
My favourite player is: De jong

Re: "There is only one Sheikh Mansour"

Postby LookMumImOnMCF.net » Sun Oct 10, 2010 12:16 pm

So there's only one Sheikh Mansour, but there's also an Abramovich?
LookMumImOnMCF.net
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Denis Law's Backheel
 
Posts: 9316
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2008 5:49 pm
Supporter of: LookMumI'mOnMCF.net
My favourite player is: LookMumI'mOnMCF.net


Return to The Maine Football forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Blue In Bolton, city72, Google [Bot], Hazy2, Majestic-12 [Bot], PeterParker and 117 guests