Colin the King wrote:What's all this about cheerleaders? Is that the terminology used now for people who get behind and encourage their own players?
I thought Corluka, by and large, was a very good player for us. He had his weaknesses like anyone else but he put in plenty of impressive performances. His form dipped from the new Year onwards, as it did to most of the players. Anyway, he doesn't play for us anymore. As for Richards, he had a poor game today, he was exceptional last week- I didn't see anything from you funnily enough last week. As soon as he plays badly you're out of the traps at greyhound speed.
As for who's better, they're vastly different players but I'd say Charlie is edging it at the moment- I believe in Micah though and hope that he puts today's performance aside and plays well for the rest of the season.
cheerleaders is a generally accepted term for people who both overhype somebody and being 'three-monkeys-like' in failing to admit to their failings;
I disagree with you about Corluka, and at the time I made this thread I knew he didn't play for us anymore
I don't believe I made ANY posts here after last week's game