Is that it transfer wise?

Here is the place to talk about all things city and football!

Re: Is that it transfer wise?

Postby steveo_88 » Tue Jan 11, 2011 1:57 pm

DoomMerchant wrote:
Dubciteh wrote:A central back up attacking midfielder is next on my list, someone who wont mind sitting on the bench but will challenge for places, if we dont sign him now we will need it in summer when vieira retires we will have little or no central midfield cover.

Ill put my head on the line and say charlie adam for 3m or whatever would be ideal, be great second choice and would relish being here, still young too


That little midfield spitfire from Borussia Dortmund looks tasty. Can't remember his name. Everyone is wan king over their Japanese striker but I'd prefer their little midfield dynamo. He'd be one to buy and groom with silva.

Cheers


I think you've hit the nail on the head Dub, if you look at our entire squad we have backup in all positions except for Silva. We finally replaced Berkovic but there is no Ali B to back him up. It was evident against Leicester where De Jong came on in the second and changed the passing from poor long attempts to the usual tic-tac-to but there was no Silva to string the short passing game up front.

I know and agree SWP, Ade, Bridge, Jo should go in the future but not until we have replacements. You do not weaken your squad before replacements have signed on the dotted line, it's plain suicide, especially if we go all the way in the league and two cup competitions!
South Stand Blue

Image
User avatar
steveo_88
Rosler's Grandad Bombed The Swamp
 
Posts: 3893
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 10:18 pm
Location: Warrington
Supporter of: Jesus Navas
My favourite player is: Eyal Berkovic

Re: Is that it transfer wise?

Postby Esky » Tue Jan 11, 2011 1:58 pm

DoomMerchant wrote:
Dubciteh wrote:A central back up attacking midfielder is next on my list, someone who wont mind sitting on the bench but will challenge for places, if we dont sign him now we will need it in summer when vieira retires we will have little or no central midfield cover.

Ill put my head on the line and say charlie adam for 3m or whatever would be ideal, be great second choice and would relish being here, still young too


That little midfield spitfire from Borussia Dortmund looks tasty. Can't remember his name. Everyone is wan king over their Japanese striker but I'd prefer their little midfield dynamo. He'd be one to buy and groom with silva.

Cheers


Nuri Sahin?
User avatar
Esky
Dickov's Injury Time Equaliser
 
Posts: 4412
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2006 1:41 pm
Location: Melbourne
Supporter of: The Blue Ship

Re: Is that it transfer wise?

Postby blootoof » Tue Jan 11, 2011 2:20 pm

Ade is out
Image
User avatar
blootoof
De Jong's Tackle
 
Posts: 1804
Joined: Wed Oct 31, 2007 12:15 am

Re: Is that it transfer wise?

Postby Chinners » Tue Jan 11, 2011 2:27 pm

blootoof wrote:Ade is out


Ha ha
Image
User avatar
Chinners
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Kaptain Kompany's Komposure
 
Posts: 14256
Joined: Wed Apr 04, 2007 12:52 pm
Location: Hampton Court Palace
Supporter of: B*ll*x
My favourite player is: Kun Tueart

Re: Is that it transfer wise?

Postby Niall Quinns Discopants » Tue Jan 11, 2011 8:43 pm

I doubt there's another big signing lined up. This big deals take ages to complete and press woul already be all over it. I reckon we might sign some promising lad to Academy again and I should Given leave, there will be domestically trained back up keeper arriving.
Sometimes we're good and sometimes we're bad but when we're good, at least we're much better than we used to be and when we are bad we're just as bad as we always used to be, so that's got to be good hasn't it?


Mark Radcliffe
User avatar
Niall Quinns Discopants
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 40255
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 1:19 pm
Location: Deep in the pimp game
Supporter of: Holistic approach
My favourite player is: Bishop Magic Don Juan

Re: Is that it transfer wise?

Postby Trautmann » Tue Jan 11, 2011 9:12 pm

Beefymcfc wrote:Torres is looking a little pissed off as late. Are we allowed to start rumours based on nothing whatsoever?


Torres would be nice. The one who plays for Crawley, I mean.
Trautmann
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Superman's Underpants
 
Posts: 648
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2006 4:24 am
Location: Vancouver Island

Re: Is that it transfer wise?

Postby chef » Tue Jan 11, 2011 10:37 pm

Dubciteh wrote:A central back up attacking midfielder is next on my list, someone who wont mind sitting on the bench but will challenge for places, if we dont sign him now we will need it in summer when vieira retires we will have little or no central midfield cover.

Ill put my head on the line and say charlie adam for 3m or whatever would be ideal, be great second choice and would relish being here, still young too


i would go for age/experiance in this position , more a short term cover for silva, with mj hopefully (soon)back to provide the complete answer. my choice would be scott parker he would provide instant impact (hit the ground running) and we might be able to offload a couple of our squad bloaters in the deal.
User avatar
chef
De Jong's Tackle
 
Posts: 1160
Joined: Sun Jan 15, 2006 12:29 am

Re: Is that it transfer wise?

Postby Beefymcfc » Tue Jan 11, 2011 10:45 pm

2 for 1 I reckon.
In the words of my Old Man, "Life will never be the same without Man City, so get it in while you can".

The Future's Bright, The Future's Blue!!!
User avatar
Beefymcfc
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 46711
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 7:14 am
Supporter of: The Mighty Blues

Re: Is that it transfer wise?

Postby john@staustell » Wed Jan 12, 2011 12:32 am

Last incoming I reckon.
“I may be drunk, Miss, but in the morning I will be sober and you will still be ugly.”
User avatar
john@staustell
Roberto Mancini's Scarf
 
Posts: 20305
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 9:35 am
Location: St Austell
Supporter of: City

Re: Is that it transfer wise?

Postby Ted Hughes » Wed Jan 12, 2011 12:59 am

Slim wrote:
Ted Hughes wrote:
Slim wrote:Maybe a defender, cannot see anymore than that, just isn't the need.


At the moment, if recent months are anything to go by, if we get a couple of injuries; Jo plays. Imagine if we actually move on Ade SWP & Co? Jo plays.


If recent news reports are to be believed, Jo is being courted by a host of clubs. I am hoping with Dzeko, Tevez, Balotelli, Johnson and Silva that his opportunities will be limited even should be stay. Even if we get another forward, who would you recommend that will be happy sitting on the bench? Sanchez? Hazard? (Think they'd be gone in a year)


Looks like Balotelli's a serious doubt to be any use for the season now so imo we sign another striker or if there's a release clause; we get Bellamy back. Imo the whole business about people who are 'not happy on the bench' is mainly down to one thing; they've not been good enough. If Jo was as good as Tevez, he would play more & Tevez would play a bit less. The same goes for every position imo. At the moment, we run some players into the ground whilst others don't play, mainly because they're not as good.

If as I fear, Balotelli is fucked for several months & Ade & RSC are going to leave, we have one proper centre forward plus Jo. One 2nd striker in Tevez. One proper wide player in AJ. One creative midfielder in Silva. An injury to Tevez & Silva & we're really struggling to get 4th.

Go for top players, whoever we can get.
The pissartist formerly known as Ted

VIVA EL CITY !!!

Some take the bible for what it's worth.. when they say that the rags shall inherit the Earth...
Well I heard that the Sheikh... bought Carlos Tevez this week...& you fuckers aint gettin' nothin..
Ted Hughes
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Colin Bell's Football Brain
 
Posts: 28488
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 4:28 pm
Supporter of: Bill Turnbull
My favourite player is: Bill Turnbull

Re: Is that it transfer wise?

Postby CityGer » Thu Jan 13, 2011 1:41 pm

Ted Hughes wrote:
Slim wrote:
Ted Hughes wrote:
Slim wrote:Maybe a defender, cannot see anymore than that, just isn't the need.


At the moment, if recent months are anything to go by, if we get a couple of injuries; Jo plays. Imagine if we actually move on Ade SWP & Co? Jo plays.


If recent news reports are to be believed, Jo is being courted by a host of clubs. I am hoping with Dzeko, Tevez, Balotelli, Johnson and Silva that his opportunities will be limited even should be stay. Even if we get another forward, who would you recommend that will be happy sitting on the bench? Sanchez? Hazard? (Think they'd be gone in a year)


Looks like Balotelli's a serious doubt to be any use for the season now so imo we sign another striker or if there's a release clause; we get Bellamy back. Imo the whole business about people who are 'not happy on the bench' is mainly down to one thing; they've not been good enough. If Jo was as good as Tevez, he would play more & Tevez would play a bit less. The same goes for every position imo. At the moment, we run some players into the ground whilst others don't play, mainly because they're not as good.

If as I fear, Balotelli is fucked for several months & Ade & RSC are going to leave, we have one proper centre forward plus Jo. One 2nd striker in Tevez. One proper wide player in AJ. One creative midfielder in Silva. An injury to Tevez & Silva & we're really struggling to get 4th.

Go for top players, whoever we can get.


Agree with this.

If the press reports are true then we are likely to lose Rocky, Ade and SWP from our list of attacking options in the next few days.

I think think this could leave us short, especially if Mario continues to pick up injuries. None of the three have been used regularly but we're still in the Europa and FA cup and could be in a hole if we were to lose two from Mario, Tevez, Dzeko, Silva and AJ at the same time.

If these three do leave I'd like to see us sign someone who can play up front or out wide as cover. A more stable, younger Bellars would be ideal. There is too much at stake to take the risk as if we are left relying on Jo for any great length of time it could really cost us.
we've got love bites and everything
Image
User avatar
CityGer
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
David Silva's Silky Skills
 
Posts: 6572
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2007 7:07 pm
Location: Linlithgow - via Ardwick
Supporter of: us

Re: Is that it transfer wise?

Postby Ted Hughes » Thu Jan 13, 2011 2:07 pm

Bob is now saying Balotelli may only be out for a few weeks BUT he's reluctant to let Adebayor go yet in case it's worse than that. Then he said Balotelli has to work in the gym because the muscle around the knee is weak. This is the exact same problem that Balotelli mentioned when he 1st arrived at the club. Therfore, he had a knee problem when we signed him. How long wil it take to fully clear up, even if he plays? Is lack of genuine match fitness one of the resaons for his perceived lazyness; lack of confidence in his knee ?

If we're really serious about winning the league & we want Ade out, why don't we try to get a replacement in now just in case & then sell somone in the summer if neccessary?
The pissartist formerly known as Ted

VIVA EL CITY !!!

Some take the bible for what it's worth.. when they say that the rags shall inherit the Earth...
Well I heard that the Sheikh... bought Carlos Tevez this week...& you fuckers aint gettin' nothin..
Ted Hughes
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Colin Bell's Football Brain
 
Posts: 28488
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 4:28 pm
Supporter of: Bill Turnbull
My favourite player is: Bill Turnbull

Re: Is that it transfer wise?

Postby john68 » Thu Jan 13, 2011 3:16 pm

From a football standpoint Ted, that makes sense.
I do wonder however if the fair play rules maybe dictating our buying policy and whether the Dzeko deal has taken us to the limit that the club considers it will be able to balance.
We know we have to offload and even so, there may be little room for financial manouvre.

Our balance sheet always seems to include our transfer spending. I would like to see how we are doing without that expenditure. It would present a clearer picture on our financial trading balance.
I KNOW THAT YOU BELIEVE THAT YOU UNDERSTOOD WHAT YOU THINK I WROTE, BUT I AM NOT SURE YOU REALISE THAT WHAT YOU READ IS NOT WHAT I MEANT
User avatar
john68
Kaptain Kompany's Komposure
 
Posts: 14630
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 4:47 pm
Location: Sittin' on the dock of the bay...wastin' time.
Supporter of: ST MARKS (W GORTON)
My favourite player is: BERT TRAUTMANN

Re: Is that it transfer wise?

Postby ronk » Fri Jan 14, 2011 6:49 am

At the point where our squad matures to a (meta-)stable state -- if it hasn't already -- there will still be four basic types of transfer ongoing. Firstly, there will be maintenance signings, someone leaves or gets old/injured and someone is signed because an identified need with the squad. i.e. we need a goalie so we sign one. Reasons could be Given leaving or an injury etc. These can often be poor value because the selling club know you need a player.

The 2nd type of signing is the value signing, this is something Chelsea have done a fair bit of but you also see from Spurs, Arsenal and the Scum: you buy a young player who is willing to be paid less for the chance of breaking into your squad, but you do it more in the hope that you can sell them at a profit due to their reputation being enhanced. Ben-Haim signing for Chelsea would be a typical example, signed as a Bosman, sold on for more than his years wages. We won't be doing much of this yet.

The 3rd type and one that's now finally become relevant is the fact that we will continually be in the market for World Class players, they are in limited supply and many don't tend to move once they've settled into an elite team. These are the guys you "break the bank" for. When you identify them, you have to move or miss them. I call them franchise players, scum have been the masters at this, there's usually a lump of cash lying around so they can splash out on Keane, Veron, Ferdinand or Rooney. Despite their money problems, they can still go out and make a big signing but he'd have to be worth the risk. Chelsea built their team around signings like Carvalho, Makelele, Essien, Drogba and Cech. The fight over Mikel was another example. I think (hope) that Dzeko falls into this general category. He's about more than specific tactical need (though that is relevant), he's of the quality that you build the team around for years to come. You don't necessarily make them that regularly.

4th type is like the 3rd type but is instead with squad players who may spend some time training with the squad and really are only expected to make an impact 6-12 months down the line. When you plan ahead with these you spend a lesser transfer fee to get far better players, you usually also end up paying less of a wage premium. Caicedo was this type of signing, Adam Johnson to an extent too. We're not so much in this market, yet.

For now, I think we're done barring a maintenance signing (depending on sales).
“Do onto others — then run!”
B. Hill
User avatar
ronk
Shaun Goater's 103 Goals
 
Posts: 7501
Joined: Thu May 18, 2006 12:23 am
Location: Dublin

Re: Is that it transfer wise?

Postby CitizenYank » Fri Jan 14, 2011 7:09 am

From the way Mancini is talking, and the rumblings in the market, I really think the team is sort of in purge mode.
I think they are trying to implement the overall plan with the fair play rules and what not, so that's why we are seeing
so much transfer talk. I am rather skeptical about the idea of lessening the squad in favor of loans, since we are still responsible
for that player in the long run. But if it helps us weed out the malcontents, more for it!!
Never touch the clowns. Let the clowns touch you!
User avatar
CitizenYank
De Jong's Tackle
 
Posts: 1386
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 3:08 am
Location: PDX, OR, USA
Supporter of: Man City, P Timbers

Re: Is that it transfer wise?

Postby lets all have a disco » Fri Jan 14, 2011 10:08 am

I'd like us to try and get Pienaar he is last year of his deal.

5 Millions should do it.
He was never me,me,me but always you,you,you
User avatar
lets all have a disco
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Pellegrini's Hoodie
 
Posts: 22479
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2005 1:20 pm
Location: Blue Army
Supporter of: Manchester City FC
My favourite player is: STILL MICAH RICHARDS

Re: Is that it transfer wise?

Postby ross.mcfc » Fri Jan 14, 2011 10:58 am

Slim wrote:I think Adam has done enough to get a move should Blackpool go down this season, but I think he is still sold on the fairytale at the moment and won't move till the summer at the earliest.


Agreed. He's in a purple patch which to be fair to him he is producing form I would never have believed possible from him. He has the right team and manager around him to florish. Go anywhere else and that will soon disapear.
ross.mcfc
Joe Hart's 29 Clean Sheets
 
Posts: 5060
Joined: Thu Dec 07, 2006 12:50 am
Location: London

Previous

Return to The Maine Football forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ayrshireblue, city72, Majestic-12 [Bot], zuricity and 236 guests