Zezou wrote:Ted Hughes wrote:If we're talking short term it surely has to be Holloway? Harry has such resources & really under Harry Spurs have only done what they should have done previously under Martin Jol or Father Damien Karras, so Harry is maybe doing about 10-15% better than average & got Chump's Lg due to the demise of Liverpool.
Holloway is over achieving by about 500%.
I recon both will soon hit a brick wall & be out of a job in a year or two though. Harry will bail out when things eventually go wrong, as they always do at every club when his team talks run out of effect, Holloway will start to suffer through lack of a defence & eventually be relegated, probably next season.
Hate to have to admit it but although not relevent du to lack of Englishness, Gollum is a class above the pair of them for keeping a bunch of fucking troglodytes competitive every season.
so many ridiculous statements in this post its untrue!!! Redknap has done a great job with spurs! they have allways had high targets and maybe been underachievers but they have never been true top 4 and maybe even title contenders as they are now....
True liverpool arent as good as they where but they still beat 16 other teams including ourselves to 4th spot!
plus harry has never managed a side as good as spurs before, really don't see why anything would go so wrong so quickly when he has continued to improve them since he took the job, after taking pourtsmouth further than anyone could ever imagine! sure they are in a mess now but thats not his fault IMO, the chairman deals with finance, harry spent what he was told he can and brought success. By far the best english manager for me.
Well that's your opinion & you're entitled to it but I recon that Spurs squad should finish in the top 5. Where do you think it should finish?