BlueinBosnia wrote:Socrates wrote:carl_feedthegoat wrote:Socrates wrote:He means the "tit from Middleton" just in case you were wondering - Carl has some very racist views about Thailand whereby he thinks it is ok to stigmatise an entire country on the basis of it having 0.4% of it's population working in the sex industry. Around 3 times the rate of the UK to put that in perspective. I reside in a condo in the suburbs, well I spend half my time here, the rest in Australia. He and his pals haven't yet accused me of buggering Skippy but is only a matter of time.
What racist views are them then ?? when have I ever been racist you TIT?????
Your racism to towards the people of Thailand comes out every time you stigmatise the country in your lame attempts to falsely brand me as a sex tourist / pedophile / liker of ladyboys etc etc and in your odious descriptions of the country as that somehow being typical. Notice again that you are calling me names and I am merely referring to facts?
I'd say it's a 'stereotype', not a 'stigma' when 3% of the (legal) economy and 11-12% of tourist money are estimated to be spent in the sex industry. Also, the 0.4% statistic you give, I believe, refers only to prostitutes, not people smugglers, pimps, barstaff or anybody else who works in and around the industry.
Figures are still a lot less than you would think from the language you use, and you are one of the biggest culprits when it comes to this subject. The vast majority of Thai tourism has nothing to do with the sex industry. Your lazy stereotyping does you no credit.