PL agenda - how come no evidence surfaces

Here is the place to talk about all things city and football!

Re: PL agenda - how come no evidence surfaces

Postby Foreverinbluedreams » Wed Mar 04, 2020 2:06 pm

I have considered them Dimples, thats why I'm saying they've had an inordinate amount of luck.

I recall fans from other clubs coming out with all sorts of theories about City's league wins in the last couple of years, doping, bribing etc. It just smacks of bitterness, I'm sorry.
Foreverinbluedreams
Denis Law's Backheel
 
Posts: 9224
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2011 8:34 pm
Supporter of: Euthanasia

Re: PL agenda - how come no evidence surfaces

Postby Hazy2 » Wed Mar 04, 2020 2:36 pm

Foreverinbluedreams wrote:I have considered them Dimples, thats why I'm saying they've had an inordinate amount of luck.

I recall fans from other clubs coming out with all sorts of theories about City's league wins in the last couple of years, doping, bribing etc. It just smacks of bitterness, I'm sorry.


No need to apologise Fibd but we are talking about scousers !
Hazy2
Denis Law's Backheel
 
Posts: 9634
Joined: Fri Dec 24, 2010 11:34 am
Supporter of: MCFC
My favourite player is: Silva

Re: PL agenda - how come no evidence surfaces

Postby Scatman » Wed Mar 04, 2020 2:49 pm

Foreverinbluedreams wrote:I have considered them Dimples, thats why I'm saying they've had an inordinate amount of luck.

I recall fans from other clubs coming out with all sorts of theories about City's league wins in the last couple of years, doping, bribing etc. It just smacks of bitterness, I'm sorry.


Also, while we are criticising UEFA for convicting us for something without any evidence, here we are doing exactly the same thing.
Scatman
Dickov's Injury Time Equaliser
 
Posts: 4477
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2008 11:06 am
Location: Manchester

Re: PL agenda - how come no evidence surfaces

Postby carl_feedthegoat » Wed Mar 04, 2020 3:04 pm

Scatman wrote:
Foreverinbluedreams wrote:I have considered them Dimples, thats why I'm saying they've had an inordinate amount of luck.

I recall fans from other clubs coming out with all sorts of theories about City's league wins in the last couple of years, doping, bribing etc. It just smacks of bitterness, I'm sorry.


Also, while we are criticising UEFA for convicting us for something without any evidence, here we are doing exactly the same thing.


So lets just ignore Halsey's damning comments shall we......nothing to see here.

Halsey, who later confirmed one incident in 2011 between Stoke City and Blackburn Rovers, made the claim on Twitter on Friday night that he has previously been told by the PGMOL to say he had not witnessed incidents that he had in fact seen during competitive English fixtures.

“I have been in that situation,” he wrote, “when I have seen an incident and been told to say I haven't seen it.” When asked further, Halsey added: “To be fair to the FA... it's not them. It comes from within the PGMOL.”
THEY SAY SWEARING IS DUE TO A LIMITED VOCABULARY. I KNOW THOUSANDS OF WORDS, BUT I STILL PREFER "FUCK OFF" TO "GO AWAY"
carl_feedthegoat
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 32119
Joined: Sun Dec 25, 2005 2:51 am
Supporter of: Man City

Re: PL agenda - how come no evidence surfaces

Postby Mase » Wed Mar 04, 2020 3:06 pm

carl_feedthegoat wrote:
Scatman wrote:
Foreverinbluedreams wrote:I have considered them Dimples, thats why I'm saying they've had an inordinate amount of luck.

I recall fans from other clubs coming out with all sorts of theories about City's league wins in the last couple of years, doping, bribing etc. It just smacks of bitterness, I'm sorry.


Also, while we are criticising UEFA for convicting us for something without any evidence, here we are doing exactly the same thing.


So lets just ignore Halsey's damning comments shall we......nothing to see here.

Halsey, who later confirmed one incident in 2011 between Stoke City and Blackburn Rovers, made the claim on Twitter on Friday night that he has previously been told by the PGMOL to say he had not witnessed incidents that he had in fact seen during competitive English fixtures.

“I have been in that situation,” he wrote, “when I have seen an incident and been told to say I haven't seen it.” When asked further, Halsey added: “To be fair to the FA... it's not them. It comes from within the PGMOL.”


When Adebayor grazed RvP’s face. Then after the match the ref was told to say he didn’t see it so they could ban him, but the replays showed he was looking right at it!
Mase
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 43942
Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 10:08 pm
Location: The North Pole.
Supporter of: Warnock's Ref Rants
My favourite player is: Danny Tiatto

Re: PL agenda - how come no evidence surfaces

Postby carl_feedthegoat » Wed Mar 04, 2020 3:10 pm

Mase wrote:
carl_feedthegoat wrote:
Scatman wrote:
Foreverinbluedreams wrote:I have considered them Dimples, thats why I'm saying they've had an inordinate amount of luck.

I recall fans from other clubs coming out with all sorts of theories about City's league wins in the last couple of years, doping, bribing etc. It just smacks of bitterness, I'm sorry.


Also, while we are criticising UEFA for convicting us for something without any evidence, here we are doing exactly the same thing.


So lets just ignore Halsey's damning comments shall we......nothing to see here.

Halsey, who later confirmed one incident in 2011 between Stoke City and Blackburn Rovers, made the claim on Twitter on Friday night that he has previously been told by the PGMOL to say he had not witnessed incidents that he had in fact seen during competitive English fixtures.

“I have been in that situation,” he wrote, “when I have seen an incident and been told to say I haven't seen it.” When asked further, Halsey added: “To be fair to the FA... it's not them. It comes from within the PGMOL.”


When Adebayor grazed RvP’s face. Then after the match the ref was told to say he didn’t see it so they could ban him, but the replays showed he was looking right at it!


Mase - even when I show written testimony from a fuckign ex ref telling all and sundry how PIGMOL are bent bastards some deniers on this site still walk around these kind of threads shaking their heads like those fucking 80,s stuffed dogs in the back window of a car.
THEY SAY SWEARING IS DUE TO A LIMITED VOCABULARY. I KNOW THOUSANDS OF WORDS, BUT I STILL PREFER "FUCK OFF" TO "GO AWAY"
carl_feedthegoat
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 32119
Joined: Sun Dec 25, 2005 2:51 am
Supporter of: Man City

Re: PL agenda - how come no evidence surfaces

Postby Hazy2 » Wed Mar 04, 2020 3:10 pm

Mase wrote:
carl_feedthegoat wrote:
Scatman wrote:
Foreverinbluedreams wrote:I have considered them Dimples, thats why I'm saying they've had an inordinate amount of luck.

I recall fans from other clubs coming out with all sorts of theories about City's league wins in the last couple of years, doping, bribing etc. It just smacks of bitterness, I'm sorry.


Also, while we are criticising UEFA for convicting us for something without any evidence, here we are doing exactly the same thing.


So lets just ignore Halsey's damning comments shall we......nothing to see here.

Halsey, who later confirmed one incident in 2011 between Stoke City and Blackburn Rovers, made the claim on Twitter on Friday night that he has previously been told by the PGMOL to say he had not witnessed incidents that he had in fact seen during competitive English fixtures.

“I have been in that situation,” he wrote, “when I have seen an incident and been told to say I haven't seen it.” When asked further, Halsey added: “To be fair to the FA... it's not them. It comes from within the PGMOL.”


When Adebayor grazed RvP’s face. Then after the match the ref was told to say he didn’t see it so they could ban him, but the replays showed he was looking right at it!


Liverpool hacking us, Mark Halsey told to play the game or else, neither given the coverage it should have had why ? In a world where football news is world news Hacking ticks every click bate outlet anywhere on the planet !
Hazy2
Denis Law's Backheel
 
Posts: 9634
Joined: Fri Dec 24, 2010 11:34 am
Supporter of: MCFC
My favourite player is: Silva

Re: PL agenda - how come no evidence surfaces

Postby carl_feedthegoat » Wed Mar 04, 2020 3:13 pm

Hazy2 wrote:
Mase wrote:
carl_feedthegoat wrote:
Scatman wrote:
Foreverinbluedreams wrote:I have considered them Dimples, thats why I'm saying they've had an inordinate amount of luck.

I recall fans from other clubs coming out with all sorts of theories about City's league wins in the last couple of years, doping, bribing etc. It just smacks of bitterness, I'm sorry.


Also, while we are criticising UEFA for convicting us for something without any evidence, here we are doing exactly the same thing.


So lets just ignore Halsey's damning comments shall we......nothing to see here.

Halsey, who later confirmed one incident in 2011 between Stoke City and Blackburn Rovers, made the claim on Twitter on Friday night that he has previously been told by the PGMOL to say he had not witnessed incidents that he had in fact seen during competitive English fixtures.

“I have been in that situation,” he wrote, “when I have seen an incident and been told to say I haven't seen it.” When asked further, Halsey added: “To be fair to the FA... it's not them. It comes from within the PGMOL.”


When Adebayor grazed RvP’s face. Then after the match the ref was told to say he didn’t see it so they could ban him, but the replays showed he was looking right at it!


Liverpool hacking us, Mark Halsey told to play the game or else, neither given the coverage it should have had why ? In a world where football news is world news Hacking ticks every click bate outlet anywhere on the planet !


It didn't happen Mase - The dippers have won fair and square all season long.
THEY SAY SWEARING IS DUE TO A LIMITED VOCABULARY. I KNOW THOUSANDS OF WORDS, BUT I STILL PREFER "FUCK OFF" TO "GO AWAY"
carl_feedthegoat
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 32119
Joined: Sun Dec 25, 2005 2:51 am
Supporter of: Man City

Re: PL agenda - how come no evidence surfaces

Postby Foreverinbluedreams » Wed Mar 04, 2020 3:20 pm

Hazy2 wrote:
Foreverinbluedreams wrote:I have considered them Dimples, thats why I'm saying they've had an inordinate amount of luck.

I recall fans from other clubs coming out with all sorts of theories about City's league wins in the last couple of years, doping, bribing etc. It just smacks of bitterness, I'm sorry.


No need to apologise Fibd but we are talking about scousers !


Fair point
Foreverinbluedreams
Denis Law's Backheel
 
Posts: 9224
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2011 8:34 pm
Supporter of: Euthanasia

Re: PL agenda - how come no evidence surfaces

Postby City64 » Wed Mar 04, 2020 4:44 pm

I am just going to leave this here .........
The fucking ashamed of nothing offended by everything murdering thieving thick as fuck bin dipping scouse bastards pampered by the UK media and tv contracts just shows what a fucked up diabolical state the UK and society in general is driven by said greedy fucks brainwashing a fucked up UK ...... fuck off !!!

CTID and let good prevail in the end .
Not really here

Fuck VAR
User avatar
City64
Paul Power's Tash
 
Posts: 10741
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2012 5:02 pm
Location: Urmston, Shevington , The Etihad , In a bar anywhere watching MCFC
Supporter of: Manchester City
My favourite player is: David Silva

Re: PL agenda - how come no evidence surfaces

Postby PeterParker » Wed Mar 04, 2020 5:26 pm

City64 wrote:I am just going to leave this here .........
The fucking ashamed of nothing offended by everything murdering thieving thick as fuck bin dipping scouse bastards pampered by the UK media and tv contracts just shows what a fucked up diabolical state the UK and society in general is driven by said greedy fucks brainwashing a fucked up UK ...... fuck off !!!

CTID and let good prevail in the end .


As I told you in the past, the issue with these fucking cunts is that they are the same all over the place and the world. Is not the local ones. If there is a liverpool fan in the village of fucking Podari, here in Romania, where they have no running water, be certain he will be an arrogant cunt. There is no term of comparision between them and the rags from my point of you.
Let's not forget, as much as we fucking hate each other, we and the rags have a big history in helping each other. With scouse, there is no one club in the history of this sport that would lend them a hand. That fucking hated they are.

Now, going back to the thread.
I am really amazed how the other 17 clubs in the league had this attitude towards them. I remember last season while Burnley, Leicester or even Brighton played finals against us, Newcastle and Huddersfield where beyond obvious on letting them win. Versus Newcastle was a football travesty, with Rondon and another fucker were playing, while the other 9 players were bent as fuck.

How can you, as a club, accept this and let them cheat you, but then play finals vs their opponents?

Is it money? Yeah, but how much money are we talking about?
Club receive a shitload of money from the broadcasters, mainly Sky, right?

I don't want to say that Sky are saying how teams should perform versus them, but the last two years were really strange to begin with.

And to end with it, I think they are doping, but so do most of the teams in the league, sadly, so do we (imho). But that will never reach the surface.

Sadly, for me the Premier League is the country whore acting like a virgin.
Image
User avatar
PeterParker
Pellegrini's Hoodie
 
Posts: 22811
Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2010 12:36 pm
Location: Bucharest
Supporter of: The Blue Moon blues
My favourite player is: King Mike

Re: PL agenda - how come no evidence surfaces

Postby bigblue » Wed Mar 04, 2020 6:05 pm

PeterParker wrote:I don't want to say that Sky are saying how teams should perform versus them, but the last two years were really strange to begin with.


That comment makes me think about when we were well ahead in the league, every commentary/analysis show would dedicate 5-10 mins on how teams need to play to beat City. Not about how good we were, just time spent pointing out how teams weren't playing good enough against us.

And now? I've yet to see a single segment on how teams should setup or perform better vs the dippers. Instead the whole time has been spent wanking them off. Interesting eh
User avatar
bigblue
Paul Power's Tash
 
Posts: 10993
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 7:11 pm
Supporter of: Manchester's Only
My favourite player is: Yaya

Re: PL agenda - how come no evidence surfaces

Postby PeterParker » Wed Mar 04, 2020 6:12 pm

bigblue wrote:
PeterParker wrote:I don't want to say that Sky are saying how teams should perform versus them, but the last two years were really strange to begin with.


That comment makes me think about when we were well ahead in the league, every commentary/analysis show would dedicate 5-10 mins on how teams need to play to beat City. Not about how good we were, just time spent pointing out how teams weren't playing good enough against us.

And now? I've yet to see a single segment on how teams should setup or perform better vs the dippers. Instead the whole time has been spent wanking them off. Interesting eh


If Sky dictates the money, all the money the clubs receive from the tv rights, then yeah, there are a lot of things that a contract might have.

Might be a script, the fuck knows. One thing I will never forget, us losing the first game of the season in 2011/12, away at Chelsea, and Wilkins, the commentator of that game said: A win for the league.

That I will never forget. That phrase said a lot.
Image
User avatar
PeterParker
Pellegrini's Hoodie
 
Posts: 22811
Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2010 12:36 pm
Location: Bucharest
Supporter of: The Blue Moon blues
My favourite player is: King Mike

Re: PL agenda - how come no evidence surfaces

Postby Simister » Wed Mar 04, 2020 6:50 pm

carl_feedthegoat wrote:
Scatman wrote:
Foreverinbluedreams wrote:I have considered them Dimples, thats why I'm saying they've had an inordinate amount of luck.

I recall fans from other clubs coming out with all sorts of theories about City's league wins in the last couple of years, doping, bribing etc. It just smacks of bitterness, I'm sorry.


Also, while we are criticising UEFA for convicting us for something without any evidence, here we are doing exactly the same thing.


So lets just ignore Halsey's damning comments shall we......nothing to see here.

Halsey, who later confirmed one incident in 2011 between Stoke City and Blackburn Rovers, made the claim on Twitter on Friday night that he has previously been told by the PGMOL to say he had not witnessed incidents that he had in fact seen during competitive English fixtures.

“I have been in that situation,” he wrote, “when I have seen an incident and been told to say I haven't seen it.” When asked further, Halsey added: “To be fair to the FA... it's not them. It comes from within the PGMOL.”




PL ref I used to know (not Halsey) was told on the phone to reverse the (admittedly dodgy) sending off of a City player because it had upset some business negotiations between club and PL.
Simister
Superman's Underpants
 
Posts: 627
Joined: Tue Sep 17, 2019 6:36 pm
Supporter of: City
My favourite player is: SWP

Re: PL agenda - how come no evidence surfaces

Postby carl_feedthegoat » Wed Mar 04, 2020 7:35 pm

Simister wrote:
carl_feedthegoat wrote:
Scatman wrote:
Foreverinbluedreams wrote:I have considered them Dimples, thats why I'm saying they've had an inordinate amount of luck.

I recall fans from other clubs coming out with all sorts of theories about City's league wins in the last couple of years, doping, bribing etc. It just smacks of bitterness, I'm sorry.


Also, while we are criticising UEFA for convicting us for something without any evidence, here we are doing exactly the same thing.


So lets just ignore Halsey's damning comments shall we......nothing to see here.

Halsey, who later confirmed one incident in 2011 between Stoke City and Blackburn Rovers, made the claim on Twitter on Friday night that he has previously been told by the PGMOL to say he had not witnessed incidents that he had in fact seen during competitive English fixtures.

“I have been in that situation,” he wrote, “when I have seen an incident and been told to say I haven't seen it.” When asked further, Halsey added: “To be fair to the FA... it's not them. It comes from within the PGMOL.”




PL ref I used to know (not Halsey) was told on the phone to reverse the (admittedly dodgy) sending off of a City player because it had upset some business negotiations between club and PL.


Some folk on here don't want to hear that mate - they want to see a ref on telly get overheard saying hes just fucked * insert any team * over by awarding a penalty.
No other evidence will be accepted by that little group.
THEY SAY SWEARING IS DUE TO A LIMITED VOCABULARY. I KNOW THOUSANDS OF WORDS, BUT I STILL PREFER "FUCK OFF" TO "GO AWAY"
carl_feedthegoat
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 32119
Joined: Sun Dec 25, 2005 2:51 am
Supporter of: Man City

Previous

Return to The Maine Football forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 193 guests