Santa Cruz out for several months?

Here is the place to talk about all things city and football!

Santa Cruz out for several months?

Postby avoidconfusion » Sun Jan 17, 2010 1:12 pm

Not even a return date:

http://www.physioroom.com/news/english_ ... _table.php

Does anyone know anything specific?

What about Tevez, Petrov and Garrido, all of which were feeling their hamstrings at some point during the game?
so now as every enemy circles our city
sour and sore, we swear war
User avatar
avoidconfusion
Rosler's Grandad Bombed The Swamp
 
Posts: 3375
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 6:20 pm
Supporter of: Manchester City
My favourite player is: Mad Zabba

Re: Santa Cruz out for several months?

Postby ashton287 » Sun Jan 17, 2010 1:47 pm

we need to get rid of cruz, he was a waste of 17 mil and is a waste of wages. Not because he's not good enough but because he can't stay fit so i say get rid to make space for a new striker that might actually play for us at some point during his contract
[center]Image[/center]
User avatar
ashton287
De Jong's Tackle
Joe Hart's 29 Clean Sheets
 
Posts: 5070
Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2009 11:02 am
Location: Manchester
Supporter of: Manchester City
My favourite player is: De jong

Re: Santa Cruz out for several months?

Postby carl_feedthegoat » Sun Jan 17, 2010 2:09 pm

BUYING SANTA CRUZ WAS PROBABLY AS BAD AS BUYING BRADBURY BACK IN THE DARK DAYS.
WE ALL KNEW RSC HAD A HORRIFIC INJURY RECORD AND HAD ONLY HAD ONE VERY GOOD SEASON IN HIS ENTIRE CAREER BUT WE STILL SHELLED OUT 17 MILLION.


MADNESS.
THEY SAY SWEARING IS DUE TO A LIMITED VOCABULARY. I KNOW THOUSANDS OF WORDS, BUT I STILL PREFER "FUCK OFF" TO "GO AWAY"
carl_feedthegoat
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 32272
Joined: Sun Dec 25, 2005 2:51 am
Supporter of: Man City

Re: Santa Cruz out for several months?

Postby shawzy » Sun Jan 17, 2010 2:09 pm

They said on ESPN it was his calf again.No idea how long hes going to be out for.
I think the purchase of RSC contributed to the sackin of Hughes and the physios who passed his medical..18mill is alot of fluckin money for someone who can hardly play a game.
Image
User avatar
shawzy
Dickov's Injury Time Equaliser
 
Posts: 4619
Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2009 10:22 pm
Supporter of: MCFC
My favourite player is: Marc-Vivien Foé

Re: Santa Cruz out for several months?

Postby The Man In Blue » Sun Jan 17, 2010 2:10 pm

if he is out for that long i'm gutted. probably the end of him at MCFC before we really saw what he could bring to the team.

a top-notch striker, but a terrible pair of knees. a shame.
User avatar
The Man In Blue
Joe Hart's 29 Clean Sheets
 
Posts: 5266
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2008 4:33 pm
Location: Whalley Range

Re: Santa Cruz out for several months?

Postby King Kev » Sun Jan 17, 2010 2:10 pm

One of the most ridiculous signings since Steve Daley, a complete waste of money. Trouble is, we are stuck with him now as nobody would be daft enough to buy him just have him taking up space in the treatment room.
[center]Image[/center]
User avatar
King Kev
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 33021
Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2005 6:38 pm
Location: Amarilla Golf, Tenerife
Supporter of: City
My favourite player is: Silva

Re: Santa Cruz out for several months?

Postby Niall Quinns Discopants » Sun Jan 17, 2010 2:14 pm

ashton287 wrote:we need to get rid of cruz, he was a waste of 17 mil and is a waste of wages. Not because he's not good enough but because he can't stay fit so i say get rid to make space for a new striker that might actually play for us at some point during his contract


Dream on.

There is absolutely NO chance of us getting rid of him before his contract runs out. He is on astronomical wages, which no one would pay for him, and we paid such sum that no one is ever going to give even one third of that back to us. Even more stupid than panic purchase of Benjani.

He turns 29 this next summer. If I remember correctly, he was given 4 year deal. Meaning he is 32 when his contract runs out. He played average 17 games a season for Bayern, many of them from the bench, and that was when he was young and in his prime. What we have here is Danny Mills situation and there's fook all we can do about it.
Sometimes we're good and sometimes we're bad but when we're good, at least we're much better than we used to be and when we are bad we're just as bad as we always used to be, so that's got to be good hasn't it?


Mark Radcliffe
User avatar
Niall Quinns Discopants
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 40255
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 1:19 pm
Location: Deep in the pimp game
Supporter of: Holistic approach
My favourite player is: Bishop Magic Don Juan

Re: Santa Cruz out for several months?

Postby Wonderwall » Sun Jan 17, 2010 2:17 pm

carl_feedthegoat wrote:BUYING SANTA CRUZ WAS PROBABLY AS BAD AS BUYING BRADBURY BACK IN THE DARK DAYS.
WE ALL KNEW RSC HAD A HORRIFIC INJURY RECORD AND HAD ONLY HAD ONE VERY GOOD SEASON IN HIS ENTIRE CAREER BUT WE STILL SHELLED OUT 17 MILLION.


MADNESS.


Not true Carl, playing Bradbury was like playing with 10 men, at least RSC being injured means we have 11 on the pitch
User avatar
Wonderwall
Colin Bell's Football Brain
 
Posts: 28928
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2005 2:58 pm
Location: Sale
Supporter of: Gods own team

Re: Santa Cruz out for several months?

Postby ENIAM NAM » Sun Jan 17, 2010 2:17 pm

Nightmare!

On another note, I wasn't there, but was to talking to someone who was and he said that Adebayor out on the pitch with the players after the game while they were warming down. Hopefully he might be back sooner than we expect.
ENIAM NAM
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Kinky's Mazy Dribbles
 
Posts: 2158
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2007 12:16 pm

Re: Santa Cruz out for several months?

Postby ashton287 » Sun Jan 17, 2010 2:22 pm

Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:
ashton287 wrote:we need to get rid of cruz, he was a waste of 17 mil and is a waste of wages. Not because he's not good enough but because he can't stay fit so i say get rid to make space for a new striker that might actually play for us at some point during his contract


Dream on.

There is absolutely NO chance of us getting rid of him before his contract runs out. He is on astronomical wages, which no one would pay for him, and we paid such sum that no one is ever going to give even one third of that back to us. Even more stupid than panic purchase of Benjani.

He turns 29 this next summer. If I remember correctly, he was given 4 year deal. Meaning he is 32 when his contract runs out. He played average 17 games a season for Bayern, many of them from the bench, and that was when he was young and in his prime. What we have here is Danny Mills situation and there's fook all we can do about it.


i'd be happy to just end his contract, give him a few million and get someone else in who can earn the wages he's on, i feel he's done and as you say no one is going to take him off our hands so were just delaying the inevitable by keeping him on when in 3 years time after paying fuck knows how much in wages and probably just as much in medical costs and were not going to renew his contract, either terminate the contract or get him fit (relatively) and take a loss on what we paid
[center]Image[/center]
User avatar
ashton287
De Jong's Tackle
Joe Hart's 29 Clean Sheets
 
Posts: 5070
Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2009 11:02 am
Location: Manchester
Supporter of: Manchester City
My favourite player is: De jong

Re: Santa Cruz out for several months?

Postby Douglas Higginbottom » Sun Jan 17, 2010 2:27 pm

If it's a recurrence of the calf injury rather than the bad knee problem he won't be out for months.
Douglas Higginbottom
Paul Power's Tash
 
Posts: 10685
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2008 10:42 pm

Re: Santa Cruz out for several months?

Postby Hinch's 5 Fingered Salute » Sun Jan 17, 2010 3:27 pm

If true that's his World Cup dream down the pan. I feel sorry for the lad as he wants to play and he is just injury prone. It was sheer madness shelling out that kind of money for him with such a record of injuries. He was injured when we bought him and out of action for half of last season.

I think people are right in saying that this and the Lescott over inflation contributed to Hughes going. It was like he had to have them at any costs rather than being able to walk away and say I'm fuck paying that.

He is a good player, but in reality was worth maybe double the £3m Blackburn paid for him.
User avatar
Hinch's 5 Fingered Salute
Robinho's Step Over
 
Posts: 221
Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2010 4:52 pm
Location: Didsbury
Supporter of: Man City
My favourite player is: Shaun Wright-Phillips

Re: Santa Cruz out for several months?

Postby DoomMerchant » Sun Jan 17, 2010 3:31 pm

Douglas Higginbottom wrote:If it's a recurrence of the calf injury rather than the bad knee problem he won't be out for months.


yeah. true.

Also: Vieira allegedly failed his medical, so let's not get all high and mighty. Managers rate who they rate. i don't rate RSC in the long term, but if he gets fit he can do something as he proved vs Sunderland. He has talent. i just don't think he will matter more than 2 matches a season. Maybe one of those will be a cup final and we'll all eat our words? who knows.

cheers

edit: *learnt* to spell allegedly. alledgedly.
Last edited by DoomMerchant on Sun Jan 17, 2010 6:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
viVa el ciTy!

"All things considered, there's absolutely no escape from this hellish situation. I'm prepared to take the coward's way out if you are. It's reincarnation or nothing." -- Gideon Stargrave

Image
User avatar
DoomMerchant
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Pellegrini's Hoodie
 
Posts: 22332
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2007 6:46 pm
Location: Orlando, FL
Supporter of: MCFC. OK.
My favourite player is: The Game

Re: Santa Cruz out for several months?

Postby Fidel Castro » Sun Jan 17, 2010 5:20 pm

Put him down. That's what they do with racehorses that are crocked isn't it?
User avatar
Fidel Castro
Neil Young's FA Cup Winning Goal
 
Posts: 11909
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2005 1:22 pm
Location: Amersfoort, Cheeseland
Supporter of: City

Re: Santa Cruz out for several months?

Postby bluej » Sun Jan 17, 2010 5:24 pm

Douglas Higginbottom wrote:If it's a recurrence of the calf injury rather than the bad knee problem he won't be out for months.


Yeah I could understand the anger if his knees went but for a 'new' injury I can't see what the problem is. Just bad luck I reckon.
bluej
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Kinky's Mazy Dribbles
 
Posts: 2654
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 12:11 am
Supporter of: MCFC

Re: Santa Cruz out for several months?

Postby Vhero » Sun Jan 17, 2010 5:47 pm

Always said he was a bad signing thanks to his injury record when we signed him and got fucking slated for it on here people saying I know fuck all about football etc.. I hate to say this but I love the fact I was right on this. Still hate the fact he's sapping up resources from our precious club though. Was never really needed to begin with we could have done better. Blackburn must be fucking kicking themselves now with joy.
User avatar
Vhero
Paul Power's Tash
 
Posts: 10613
Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2007 6:56 pm
Location: Manchester
Supporter of: MCFC
My favourite player is: Kinkladze

Re: Santa Cruz out for several months?

Postby bluej » Sun Jan 17, 2010 5:53 pm

Vhero wrote:Always said he was a bad signing thanks to his injury record when we signed him and got fucking slated for it on here people saying I know fuck all about football etc.. I hate to say this but I love the fact I was right on this. Still hate the fact he's sapping up resources from our precious club though. Was never really needed to begin with we could have done better. Blackburn must be fucking kicking themselves now with joy.



PMSL! That's a new one.
bluej
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Kinky's Mazy Dribbles
 
Posts: 2654
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 12:11 am
Supporter of: MCFC

Re: Santa Cruz out for several months?

Postby sniffer » Sun Jan 17, 2010 6:46 pm

I say the club should just right him off for the season and send him to germany or where ever with some specialist to actually get fit and hope he can start afresh next season.
sniffer
Robinho's Step Over
 
Posts: 221
Joined: Tue Jul 18, 2006 8:02 am

Re: Santa Cruz out for several months?

Postby Ted Hughes » Sun Jan 17, 2010 6:50 pm

No return date doesn't mean he's out for months it means they don't know yet. Either way, he's proved unfortunately that we can't rely on him so we should sign a striker right now. We can't trust Ade & Benjani's not good enough.

Noticed that Ireland & Vieira are down as 19th. Both fit for rags game?
The pissartist formerly known as Ted

VIVA EL CITY !!!

Some take the bible for what it's worth.. when they say that the rags shall inherit the Earth...
Well I heard that the Sheikh... bought Carlos Tevez this week...& you fuckers aint gettin' nothin..
Ted Hughes
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Colin Bell's Football Brain
 
Posts: 28488
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 4:28 pm
Supporter of: Bill Turnbull
My favourite player is: Bill Turnbull

Re: Santa Cruz out for several months?

Postby Hinch's 5 Fingered Salute » Sun Jan 17, 2010 7:10 pm

can we get a refund? I know we have gone over the 28 days, but surely he should be guaranteed for a year!
User avatar
Hinch's 5 Fingered Salute
Robinho's Step Over
 
Posts: 221
Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2010 4:52 pm
Location: Didsbury
Supporter of: Man City
My favourite player is: Shaun Wright-Phillips

Next

Return to The Maine Football forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ayrshireblue, Bluemoon4610, city72, CTID Hants, Google [Bot], Harry Dowd scored, Hazy2, john@staustell, Mase, Nickyboy, Nigels Tackle, nottsblue, PeterParker, Scatman, sheblue, stupot and 207 guests