Cikku wrote:Ok guys, I had logged out of here with no intention of returning because wasting my time on a Citeh site is not really my cup of tea, there are far more interesting things online. I then got an email saying that some messages have been posted which got me curious enough to have a look at them. I still have no intention of remaining but there appears to be disbelief that somebody in Australia during the 50's and 60's could become a committed fan of United or for that matter, any other club in England. Without turning it into a history lesson, I will tell you as briefly as I can manage.
I was a 12 year old football mad kid in Malta when my family migrated to Australia in 1956 without having any particular interest in any English club. Football coverage was virtually non existent over here at the time apart from the results and tables in the Monday papers. Oh yes, the FA Cup final was broadcast live on radio every year and that was about it. There were plenty of English football publications in newsagents however which were the only ones that could satisfy my football interest. Some of you must remember the old Charles Buchan's Football Monthly which I began to get regularly. I still have the old, tattered and faded collection stored away with the first issue I got hold of was from memory around August 1958 with a young Bobby Charlton on the cover.
There were also the old Roy of the Rovers and Tiger comics which had a lot of football content. Our local library was also well stocked with books from the likes of Billy Wright, Nat Lofthouse, Annuals and many others. In the early sixties World Soccer magazine came along which to me bacame like a football bible, it's another collection which is still stored away. Then came the weekly Shoot, Match and other weekly magazines which became must reads.
Somebody mentioned newspapers. You may not know it but in those days, the Daily Mirror used to bind all the weeks seven daily issues and ship them to newsagents in Australia. Yes, they were nearly three months behind the issue date but I still got a kick from reading about what was going on in English football.
So now we come to how Manchester United came into the life of a 14 year old kid and like so many others it was obviously because of Munich. I did not follow any particular club at that stage and such a tragedy has a profound effect on a young kid. If that happened to any other club, I just may be one of their fans today. If not for Munich, something else may have happened which could have attracted my support. A number of English clubs toured Australia in the early sixties amongst them Everton, Chelsea and yes even Manchester City and I could have turned towards one of them had I not already committed myself to United. It's difficult to comprehend how anyone can think that someone who began following a club at a time when their team was ripped apart by tragedy can be labeled a 'plastic fan' and a 'glory hunter'. Can it possibly make any sort of sense?
My support was reinforced in the summer of 1967 when United made an Australian tour. I somehow managed to sneak my way into a Sydney airport reception for them while in transit to Brisbane. There I was talking and mingling with idols like Busby, Law, Charlton, Best, Crerand and even an 18 year old unknown Brian Kidd. There was never going to be any other club for me after that even through the long barren period. Yes success, live TV, videos, the internet and a couple of visits to Old Trafford followed over the years which only consolidated my support.
Finally, this post has gone on for longer than I wanted it to but really, why do so many find it so hard to understand that fierce support for a club can be generated in many and varied ways irrespective of where you may be living?
Fair play to your answer. Although there were minor issues with facts (Match only started around 1980.... I know this because when I started reading it around 1985 I think they were on volume 5), I found it quite interesting.
However, that comment you made pisses me off the most and is the reason why some Blues prefer to call your lot Munichs (let's not enter into argument whether it's right or wrong). There WAS another team with similar tragedy. Everyone in all-conquering A.C.Torino team died 1949 air crash (
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superga_air_disaster ). While widely forgotten, lot of football historians consider them to be the best Club side ever alongside maybe Real Madrid of late-50's. Now if I'm right, you would've been around six or seven at the time. That's roughly the age I started following City (not a slanging contest, what I mean is that you would've been old enough to follow football). It's fair to say that Torino never recovered and found their former glories. They chose to mourn in quiet showing respect to families of the players. United on the other hand chose to make Munich Air disaster a global marketing campaign and build their/your Club around the folklore of the horrible disaster. Whereas Torino held charity game for the players in immediate aftermath, first time united financially recognised the families of Munich air disaster was few years ago. That's how far they took their greed.