The mancityfans.net football forum

Harry Dowd scored wrote:Just look at this shit, am furious -:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/footb ... eague.html

“writes RIATH AL-SAMARRAI..”

Two weeks ago the same “journalist” wrote about “poor tired Tiger Woods”

Wonder why he got his job…. *tick*

The coping mechanism is there to be used before each city game and in abundance after each city win.

We beat forest today and wait until you see what they write tomorrow.

I can see the future

The Mail, like an Arsenal fan runs the back page. Add this comic to the list.

I think Arsenal owe us a huge THANK YOU for playing as shit as we possibly can and yet we still win......fucking hilarious.

Can't find the news on here anywhere that all clubs bar Chelsea (abstained), us, scum and villa all voted for spending cap..

Nick wrote:Can't find the news on here anywhere that all clubs bar Chelsea (abstained), us, scum and villa all voted for spending cap..

Beeb now have an article about it and show City way ahead of anyone else in Revenue. 65 mill ahead of the Rags.

16 from 20 , three of the sixteen will be relegated, further crimping the finances of the three coming up from the Championship.

A good old 20 year experienced Lawyer specialising in Company Law would pull holes in this agreement or he'd have to be a loony

Nick wrote:Can't find the news on here anywhere that all clubs bar Chelsea (abstained), us, scum and villa all voted for spending cap..

e-mail
158
shares
97
View comments
Premier League clubs have agreed to continue working on introducing a hard spending cap from the start of the 2025-26 season as part of a new system of financial controls to replace the much-maligned Profit and Sustainability Rules.

Under proposals to be formally voted on at the Premier League's AGM in June, all clubs' spending on transfers, wages and agent fees will be limited to around five times the amount earned by the top-flight's bottom club in TV and prize money, which was £100.3million for Southampton last season.

Manchester United, Manchester City and Aston Villa all voted against the new system known as 'anchoring' at a meeting in London on Monday, with Chelsea abstaining, but with 16 clubs in favour the new restrictions are expected to be agreed at their end of season meeting.


While the precise ratio has yet to be determined the new rules are expected to 'anchor' spending to around five times the income of the bottom club, amounting to around £500m.

The clubs have also yet to agree whether the new limits would apply to their entire staff costs or just player wages.

Premier League just desperate for the Super League to come in. Muppets

Mase wrote:Premier League just desperate for the Super League to come in. Muppets

Expect a law suit from Fozzy and Kermit. Comparing those top guys to the wallies at the PL. Oh shit, Waldo will be after us now.

Original Dub wrote:https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-13364135/The-introduction-salary-cap-stop-Manchester-Citys-accounting-gymnastics-writes-IAN-HERBERT-Premier-League-champions-voted-against-introduction.html

It will never end mate will it , So three teams and an abstainer But it will stop Manchester City payroll gymnastics , not a dickie bird on the others laughable

Original Dub wrote:https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-13364135/The-introduction-salary-cap-stop-Manchester-Citys-accounting-gymnastics-writes-IAN-HERBERT-Premier-League-champions-voted-against-introduction.html

Utter scouse supporting cunt, wanna talk Heysel?,

Original Dub wrote:https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-13364135/The-introduction-salary-cap-stop-Manchester-Citys-accounting-gymnastics-writes-IAN-HERBERT-Premier-League-champions-voted-against-introduction.html

Just left him a comment on that one. Funny how he didn't mention the objection of United

john@staustell wrote:

Original Dub wrote:https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-13364135/The-introduction-salary-cap-stop-Manchester-Citys-accounting-gymnastics-writes-IAN-HERBERT-Premier-League-champions-voted-against-introduction.html

Just left him a comment on that one. Funny how he didn't mention the objection of United

Nice one

I really enjoyed reading this one as well.

''Well done Ian. Any excuse to roll out anti-City nonsense. Your own words state that it is Chelsea who would be guilty, not City, a club that is well run from top to bottom, but constantly accused, not charged, with FFP, PSR and now, because all of that has failed, a wage-cap that they are adhering to anyway!
The word on the street in Manchester is that the 115 allegations actually boil down to just 5 rule breaches. 3 of them are for not assisting the PL with their investigation. But Forest and Everton did, and still got found guilty. There's not a sane person in history who assists their accusers in a trial.
The smart people are saying that the delay is due to agreeing an exit strategy that saves face for the Premier League, because they'll look very silly if they tell the truth, that there is no case to answer. The newspapers will also look silly for continually jumping on the bandwagon with no proof.
It is believed that litigation will follow, from City, against all those who were too quick and eager to damage reputation and integrity.
I'm looking forward to PGMOL like apologies and fines when the truth comes out! Shame, Shame, Shame...''

carl_feedthegoat wrote:https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/man-city-spending-warning-highlights-29087590

This salary cap is just another version of the draft - guaranteeing the US hedgie backed clubs get a guaranteed return on their investment via a set percentage of the prize pot. Totally anti-competitive and Real, Bayern & PSG will be rubbing their hands at the prospect of hoovering up the best players.Yanks don't care about the future if the game, only a risk free quick profit. They are here to siphon the cash out of our game and their vulture capital will roll on when its gone. Just the entertainment business for them, that's why they hate long term investment and have been trying to destroy us since the Sheikh took over. Simple and nasty as that.

carl_feedthegoat wrote:

john@staustell wrote:

Original Dub wrote:https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-13364135/The-introduction-salary-cap-stop-Manchester-Citys-accounting-gymnastics-writes-IAN-HERBERT-Premier-League-champions-voted-against-introduction.html

Just left him a comment on that one. Funny how he didn't mention the objection of United

Nice one

I really enjoyed reading this one as well.

''Well done Ian. Any excuse to roll out anti-City nonsense. Your own words state that it is Chelsea who would be guilty, not City, a club that is well run from top to bottom, but constantly accused, not charged, with FFP, PSR and now, because all of that has failed, a wage-cap that they are adhering to anyway!
The word on the street in Manchester is that the 115 allegations actually boil down to just 5 rule breaches. 3 of them are for not assisting the PL with their investigation. But Forest and Everton did, and still got found guilty. There's not a sane person in history who assists their accusers in a trial.
The smart people are saying that the delay is due to agreeing an exit strategy that saves face for the Premier League, because they'll look very silly if they tell the truth, that there is no case to answer. The newspapers will also look silly for continually jumping on the bandwagon with no proof.
It is believed that litigation will follow, from City, against all those who were too quick and eager to damage reputation and integrity.
I'm looking forward to PGMOL like apologies and fines when the truth comes out! Shame, Shame, Shame...''

Herbert is our arch hater along with Jackson. So we are the only top flight club performing accounting gymnastics ? Just a brazen lie and at least our profits are taxed in and go to the UK not the Cayman Islands/ Delaware haven the rags and the other yank chiselers use.

johnny crossan wrote:

carl_feedthegoat wrote:

john@staustell wrote:

Original Dub wrote:https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-13364135/The-introduction-salary-cap-stop-Manchester-Citys-accounting-gymnastics-writes-IAN-HERBERT-Premier-League-champions-voted-against-introduction.html

Just left him a comment on that one. Funny how he didn't mention the objection of United

Nice one

I really enjoyed reading this one as well.

''Well done Ian. Any excuse to roll out anti-City nonsense. Your own words state that it is Chelsea who would be guilty, not City, a club that is well run from top to bottom, but constantly accused, not charged, with FFP, PSR and now, because all of that has failed, a wage-cap that they are adhering to anyway!
The word on the street in Manchester is that the 115 allegations actually boil down to just 5 rule breaches. 3 of them are for not assisting the PL with their investigation. But Forest and Everton did, and still got found guilty. There's not a sane person in history who assists their accusers in a trial.
The smart people are saying that the delay is due to agreeing an exit strategy that saves face for the Premier League, because they'll look very silly if they tell the truth, that there is no case to answer. The newspapers will also look silly for continually jumping on the bandwagon with no proof.
It is believed that litigation will follow, from City, against all those who were too quick and eager to damage reputation and integrity.
I'm looking forward to PGMOL like apologies and fines when the truth comes out! Shame, Shame, Shame...''

Herbert is our arch hater along with Jackson. So we are the only top flight club performing accounting gymnastics ? Just a brazen lie and at least our profits are taxed in and go to the UK not the Cayman Islands/ Delaware haven the rags and the other yank chiselers use.

If big businesses accountants do not do ‘ accounting-gymnastics‘ to legally ensure the owners make as much profit as possible then they are a waste of fucking office space .

So much bitterness and envy from some wankers that steal fresh air - I’d shit them all .

Ian Herbert now reckons Cole Palmer should get the POTY award over Foden.

If there is any justice in the world then he will contract Aids.

carl_feedthegoat wrote:Ian Herbert now reckons Cole Palmer should get the POTY award over Foden.

If there is any justice in the world then he will contract

---

Aids.

monkeypox
Mpox can spread through close contact of any kind, including through Herbert kissing, touching, oral and penetrative vaginal or anal sex with a monkey who is infectious. Herbert who have sex with multiple primates or new (superfamily Hominoidea) is most at risk.