Football Media

[iwasthere2012]

[Beefymcfc]

[iwasthere2012]

[Mase]

BBC website leading with:
'Burnley, with 19% possession, upset Liverpool'

Horrible bitter pricks!

[Beefymcfc]

[Foreverinbluedreams]

[Beefymcfc]

[nottsblue]

[Mase]

They've even gone as far as trying to take people's attention off the defeat by going back to 2012 on Andre Gray's Twitter and found some homophobic 'tweets' and are reporting on that.

Couldn't make this up!

[Beefymcfc]

Anybody have the misfortune to watch MotD? What a perfect line-up that was. The in-game commentary was decent for both teams and quite a lot of praise for Raheem but then, up pops RatBoy 2. Instead of how we played, the difficult conditions or even how the new regulations affected the game, we got a full analysis of how bad Raheem played and how he could've done better. This, from a second rate player who was only shoehorned in because of the brother.

To finish the piece off he believed that Raheem should've took the keeper on instead of playing the dead cert to Nolito before Murphy comes on to say Stoke were a little 'unlucky'.

I've noticed many of the major media outlets are starting to come around since the appointment of Pep but one outlet still decided to deride whatever we do, all in an effort to appease all that is Red.

[john@staustell]

They lose all perspective. They spend all the pre match telling us how hard it is to win at windy Stoke, we've hardly ever won there and list all the big clubs who lost there. Sounesa actually said we couldn't break down defences because we didn't have a Messi.

Then we win 4-1 and they say it was poor because a few passes went astray second half .

It's ludicrous

[johnny crossan]

[Hazy2]

Scousers lose bury it with take over story !

[johnny crossan]

[johnny crossan]

[patrickblue]

[Beefymcfc]

[john@staustell]

[Foreverinbluedreams]

[john@staustell]