walmai wrote:
OK - fair point (as much as 'getting to Wembley', however and whatever for, represents a real achievement for West Ham).
Answer me this question, that I asked my City mate as we watched you beat Chels.
If you win the FA Cup and come 2nd, but
They win Europa and come 3rd
Who were the season's second best team?
I ask that from the perspective of it still sinking in that Man United seem to have won the title so easily. I can see the strengths of your team from a mile off, but can't really understand why the players didn't really perform in any consistent fashion.
Additionally, with the right appointment in the summer, I can see Chelsea take a few strides further in terms of the league next season: they've got right the forward options, just need to tighten up defence a few notches. That's not a prospect that cheers me in the least, I should add.
Well we've outclassed Chelsea four times this season, and we've also been the better side against Stretford twice (though the way they bagged 3 points at Eastlands was a textbook away performance). Our main problems are, a) a lack of pace out wide, making us too narrow, and b) a poor conversion rate. If you watched the semi and the Spurs game, you'll have seem that both opponents should've been out of the game by half time, but weren't. Stretford kill games off while they're on top (or even when they're not) and we haven't managed to do so.
As for Chelsea, I still think there's a massive imbalance in their squad. For me, there defensive problems stem from midfield. You get at Mata, Hazard, Oscar, Mikel properly and you just waltz through them. They offer no protection to the back four.