Hazy2 wrote:Bianchi on Ice wrote:Hazy2 wrote:A mess , we need a coach who can do what France are doing, no Egos , no rep before the team, we have players, we need world class management.
No Egos. France. haha. nice.
Every team has to face the reality of NO I in Team, Nasri was sadly not wanted by the players, Dechamps has a tough job I agree, they have an eye on 2016 Glory. Si build now, England are just S.O.S. Until we have a plan in place we will never have a chance. Jagielka good enough now or 5 yrs ago for this level, no Stomnes would have done no worse, Shaw for Baines, simple maths tells us the players we chose are decent at Premier level, thats it, Gerrard, Rooney not going to get any better, Lampard was was the point. Mess.
We didn't have much to choose from in defence tbf. The best cbs are too old, right backs all injured.
But neither Gerrard nor Lampard should even be at the tournament. This was the time to start building a new team, in which Rooney should be just one player IF SELECTED for the game, not an automatic choice who creates headline news if he is dropped. Everyone should have been used to Rooney being dropped by the time this tournament came along, as it should have been a regular thing over the last two years, he only plays when it suits the team formation & when he's earned it. Everyone should be used to the absence of Gerrard & Lampard; they should have been forcibly retired.
If neither were around, England would HAVE to find a way of playing, as a team, without them. If that means playing Phil fucking Jones in def midfield gets the best results, then that's what you do, create a team, whatever it takes. But as soon as you put Gerrard & Lampard into the equation, there is always the default setting to fall back on; the one which has been proven time & again, not to work.
This is how England operate & will no doubt do so again.