The mancityfans.net football forum

brite blu sky wrote:

david yearsley wrote:Do people on here think though that this is symptomatic of the pressure Mancio is under - is it starting to get to him?

i thought that initially, then watched the vid on the OS, then thought no it is not a sign of the pressure and i posted that it was a load of b*ll*x, then i read Doug's training post where he confirms that allegedly Greg got out of his car looking very angry!

my thinking now is that this was engineered by our marketing peeps, to get the build up to the Pool game going.
Why?
because it centers on Bellers, and he is the Beast in a well organised and impressive marketing campaign.. JUST FOR THIS GAME!

i just cant put it past them that they might try and do this to launch the controversy into the national press and let the viral campaign piggy back it to up the ante for the game and get City's name everywhere.

i think the ' and dont come back for three months' line is the key phrase that does it for me.

Lets see what happens and if the press take it and chew on it

david yearsley wrote:

brite blu sky wrote:

david yearsley wrote:Do people on here think though that this is symptomatic of the pressure Mancio is under - is it starting to get to him?

i thought that initially, then watched the vid on the OS, then thought no it is not a sign of the pressure and i posted that it was a load of b*ll*x, then i read Doug's training post where he confirms that allegedly Greg got out of his car looking very angry!

my thinking now is that this was engineered by our marketing peeps, to get the build up to the Pool game going.
Why?
because it centers on Bellers, and he is the Beast in a well organised and impressive marketing campaign.. JUST FOR THIS GAME!

i just cant put it past them that they might try and do this to launch the controversy into the national press and let the viral campaign piggy back it to up the ante for the game and get City's name everywhere.

i think the ' and dont come back for three months' line is the key phrase that does it for me.

Lets see what happens and if the press take it and chew on it

You might be right mate - a bit of seige mentality might be a positive thing!

Redna wrote:Are we top of the world or are we top of the world?
Maybe we need a manager who's taking the shit with a diabolical english which tend to be more than it is.
Negative football is one thing but that might be in a long sighted plan rather than the Longsight plan.
When the gunsmoke has vanished there might be some new elements to the great thing called Manchester City Football Club. Here's hoping!
CTID!!

Redna wrote:I might be shady and that's what I am.
We have the richest patron ever to own a football club. Mr Manc is hired to steady things up the nostra cosa way. Longhsight is a neighbourhood NOT known for it's well trimmed gardens but as all speaks the same language ther is something going on. And besides that Jag är full.Fredag och svenssonfyllan slår till.
CTID!!

Ted Hughes wrote:

johnpb78 wrote:

MANCIO4EVER wrote:The only reliable sourse.

http://www.mcfc.co.uk/News/Team-news/20 ... for-Sunday

Its a reliable source of the side of the story you want to believe

Why in Gods name would you CHOOSE to believe a reporter from the Sun rather than the manager? Is it true that Bellamy has been kicked out for 6 months? Do you know for sure the reporter stood there from 7 in the morning until evening watching the front gate at City to see whether Bellamy came in or out? What's the matter with you man? Sort yourself out, your'e supposed to be a City fan aren't you?

mr_nool wrote:

Redna wrote:I might be shady and that's what I am.
We have the richest patron ever to own a football club. Mr Manc is hired to steady things up the nostra cosa way. Longhsight is a neighbourhood NOT known for it's well trimmed gardens but as all speaks the same language ther is something going on. And besides that Jag är full.Fredag och svenssonfyllan slår till.
CTID!!

HA HA HA. Jag också!

aaron bond wrote:I'm not sure what's happened but if they had a disagreement then so what? I'm sure it happens at all clubs occasionally, but like you would do in any profession, you just get on with it because you have a job to do.

And also, why are so many on here quick to assume Mancini is in the wrong and saying that it is he that should 'fuck off'? Before Bellamy played for us, he was hated by pretty much everyone and known to cause problems at all the clubs he's been at. For all we know, he could have started this row.

BTW...I'm not saying Bellamy has done anything wrong, same goes for Mancini. I just don't understand why people are so quick to jump to conclusions based on a story originating in The Sun.

BobKowalski wrote:

aaron bond wrote:I'm not sure what's happened but if they had a disagreement then so what? I'm sure it happens at all clubs occasionally, but like you would do in any profession, you just get on with it because you have a job to do.

And also, why are so many on here quick to assume Mancini is in the wrong and saying that it is he that should 'fuck off'? Before Bellamy played for us, he was hated by pretty much everyone and known to cause problems at all the clubs he's been at. For all we know, he could have started this row.

BTW...I'm not saying Bellamy has done anything wrong, same goes for Mancini. I just don't understand why people are so quick to jump to conclusions based on a story originating in The Sun.

Because its an opportunity to smack Mancini round the head.

Sun prints story about dressing room row = smack Mancini round the head

Mancini denies the story = Mancini lies = smack round the head

The rules are simple and anyone can play :)

johnpb78 wrote:

Ted Hughes wrote:

johnpb78 wrote:

MANCIO4EVER wrote:The only reliable sourse.

http://www.mcfc.co.uk/News/Team-news/20 ... for-Sunday

Its a reliable source of the side of the story you want to believe

Why in Gods name would you CHOOSE to believe a reporter from the Sun rather than the manager? Is it true that Bellamy has been kicked out for 6 months? Do you know for sure the reporter stood there from 7 in the morning until evening watching the front gate at City to see whether Bellamy came in or out? What's the matter with you man? Sort yourself out, your'e supposed to be a City fan aren't you?

Its up to each individual who they believe, and as I think I have already stated on the thread, I dont believe either side are telling the truth to be honest, the Sun to sell papers and City to save face.

And if you have ever been to Carrington when something is kicking off, there are always press at the gate hoping to grab a photo of the alleged "culprit", which is where my teleporting comment came from. If the Sun had a sniff of this story and had been told that Bellamy had been banished, of course they would have someone stood on the gate.

The person at the press conference wasn't digging, he stated what he clearly believed to be a fact when he said "Craig Bellamy was not at training yesterday" twice because Mancini pretended not to hear it the first time.

Redna wrote:I might be shady and that's what I am.
We have the richest patron ever to own a football club. Mr Manc is hired to steady things up the nostra cosa way. Longhsight is a neighbourhood NOT known for it's well trimmed gardens but as all speaks the same language ther is something going on. And besides that Jag är full.Fredag och svenssonfyllan slår till.
CTID!!

MANCIO4EVER wrote:

johnpb78 wrote:

Ted Hughes wrote:

johnpb78 wrote:

MANCIO4EVER wrote:The only reliable sourse.

http://www.mcfc.co.uk/News/Team-news/20 ... for-Sunday

Its a reliable source of the side of the story you want to believe

Why in Gods name would you CHOOSE to believe a reporter from the Sun rather than the manager? Is it true that Bellamy has been kicked out for 6 months? Do you know for sure the reporter stood there from 7 in the morning until evening watching the front gate at City to see whether Bellamy came in or out? What's the matter with you man? Sort yourself out, your'e supposed to be a City fan aren't you?

Its up to each individual who they believe, and as I think I have already stated on the thread, I dont believe either side are telling the truth to be honest, the Sun to sell papers and City to save face.

And if you have ever been to Carrington when something is kicking off, there are always press at the gate hoping to grab a photo of the alleged "culprit", which is where my teleporting comment came from. If the Sun had a sniff of this story and had been told that Bellamy had been banished, of course they would have someone stood on the gate.

The person at the press conference wasn't digging, he stated what he clearly believed to be a fact when he said "Craig Bellamy was not at training yesterday" twice because Mancini pretended not to hear it the first time.

Perhaps we saw a different conference. It is available on OS.
I saw Mancini quietly replying to any question with the usual cool mood, at the usual very basic language level. Also showing some humorous smiles, watching firmly into the interviewer's glance, unless when feeling the need to turn to the translator's assistance.

Hope what is a fully entitled way to represent anybody's right of disagreement in a forum chat, won't be reflected in a defiant mood during sunday attendance. That pivotal match will be the perfect venue to mean CTID...

aaron bond wrote:I'm not sure what's happened but if they had a disagreement then so what? I'm sure it happens at all clubs occasionally, but like you would do in any profession, you just get on with it because you have a job to do.

And also, why are so many on here quick to assume Mancini is in the wrong and saying that it is he that should 'fuck off'? Before Bellamy played for us, he was hated by pretty much everyone and known to cause problems at all the clubs he's been at. For all we know, he could have started this row.

BTW...I'm not saying Bellamy has done anything wrong, same goes for Mancini. I just don't understand why people are so quick to jump to conclusions based on a story originating in The Sun.

johnpb78 wrote:

MANCIO4EVER wrote:

johnpb78 wrote:

johnpb78 wrote:

MANCIO4EVER wrote:The only reliable sourse.

http://www.mcfc.co.uk/News/Team-news/20 ... for-Sunday

Its a reliable source of the side of the story you want to believe

Its up to each individual who they believe, and as I think I have already stated on the thread, I dont believe either side are telling the truth to be honest, the Sun to sell papers and City to save face.

And if you have ever been to Carrington when something is kicking off, there are always press at the gate hoping to grab a photo of the alleged "culprit", which is where my teleporting comment came from. If the Sun had a sniff of this story and had been told that Bellamy had been banished, of course they would have someone stood on the gate.

The person at the press conference wasn't digging, he stated what he clearly believed to be a fact when he said "Craig Bellamy was not at training yesterday" twice because Mancini pretended not to hear it the first time.

Perhaps we saw a different conference. It is available on OS.
I saw Mancini quietly replying to any question with the usual cool mood, at the usual very basic language level. Also showing some humorous smiles, watching firmly into the interviewer's glance, unless when feeling the need to turn to the translator's assistance.

Hope what is a fully entitled way to represent anybody's right of disagreement in a forum chat, won't be reflected in a defiant mood during sunday attendance. That pivotal match will be the perfect venue to mean CTID...

Tomorrows headlines?

"Football club in editing tv footage to suit shocker"

johnpb78 wrote:
Tomorrows headlines?

"Football club in editing tv footage to suit shocker"

johnpb78 wrote:

Ted Hughes wrote:

johnpb78 wrote:

MANCIO4EVER wrote:The only reliable sourse.

http://www.mcfc.co.uk/News/Team-news/20 ... for-Sunday

Its a reliable source of the side of the story you want to believe

Why in Gods name would you CHOOSE to believe a reporter from the Sun rather than the manager? Is it true that Bellamy has been kicked out for 6 months? Do you know for sure the reporter stood there from 7 in the morning until evening watching the front gate at City to see whether Bellamy came in or out? What's the matter with you man? Sort yourself out, your'e supposed to be a City fan aren't you?

Its up to each individual who they believe, and as I think I have already stated on the thread, I dont believe either side are telling the truth to be honest, the Sun to sell papers and City to save face.

And if you have ever been to Carrington when something is kicking off, there are always press at the gate hoping to grab a photo of the alleged "culprit", which is where my teleporting comment came from. If the Sun had a sniff of this story and had been told that Bellamy had been banished, of course they would have someone stood on the gate.

The person at the press conference wasn't digging, he stated what he clearly believed to be a fact when he said "Craig Bellamy was not at training yesterday" twice because Mancini pretended not to hear it the first time.

Douglas Higginbottom wrote:I am not 100% sure what days the reporter was talking about for Bellamy not to have been at training but for definite there was no training on Thursday. It is entirely possible that an injured player or one only just fit wanting a little more treatment would come in to see a physio. On the wednesday after the Stoke match those who played would not be in for " normal" training if any at all but those on the bench or not selected would go in as normal.