Page 9 of 11

Re: City to ask permission for Joe to come back [merged]

PostPosted: Tue Apr 27, 2010 8:23 pm
by citytilidie
uh oh, more and more sources running with this story now on news now... arghhhh :(

Re: City to ask permission for Joe to come back [merged]

PostPosted: Tue Apr 27, 2010 8:24 pm
by carl_feedthegoat
avoidconfusion wrote:
carl_feedthegoat wrote:We better not loan out Hart or Weiss next season otherwise Ill be very very upset.


Me too. What do you say, you and me twatting Cook and Marwood if they do loan him out?


I dont like Cook.....Marwood brought in AJ...so I like him for now bugt cook is a Baffoon......till further notice.

Re: City to ask permission for Joe to come back [merged]

PostPosted: Tue Apr 27, 2010 8:25 pm
by avoidconfusion

Re: City to ask permission for Joe to come back [merged]

PostPosted: Tue Apr 27, 2010 8:28 pm
by Beefymcfc
carl_feedthegoat wrote:
avoidconfusion wrote:
carl_feedthegoat wrote:We better not loan out Hart or Weiss next season otherwise Ill be very very upset.


Me too. What do you say, you and me twatting Cook and Marwood if they do loan him out?


I dont like Cook.....Marwood brought in AJ...so I like him for now bugt cook is a Baffoon......till further notice.

But Cook brought Marwood in...........shakes head in bewilderment ;-)

Re: City to ask permission for Joe to come back [merged]

PostPosted: Tue Apr 27, 2010 8:28 pm
by gillie
Fuck it let's go with Gunnar and rip Villa and Spuds new arseholes into the bargain then beat West Ham last day and stick 2 huge fingers up to the lot of them.

Re: City to ask permission for Joe to come back [merged]

PostPosted: Tue Apr 27, 2010 8:28 pm
by Green & Blue
Premier league claiming its too much of an advantage to have Hart back,what a sick joke.Hes our player and a club should have the power to recall one of their own in such circumstances as we find ourselves in.

If we end up with Fulop i have to say its not going to fill me with confidence.

Re: City to ask permission for Joe to come back [merged]

PostPosted: Tue Apr 27, 2010 8:29 pm
by Beefymcfc
Go-On the Gunner!!!

Re: City to ask permission for Joe to come back [merged]

PostPosted: Tue Apr 27, 2010 8:33 pm
by Craig B


I'm a little bit more apprehensive about this than I was yesterday having seen how many goals he's let in for Sunderland this season.. can't remember the actual figure but it was a fair sum including 7 at Chelsea. Ah well, attack is the best form of defence and all that!

Re: City to ask permission for Joe to come back [merged]

PostPosted: Tue Apr 27, 2010 8:34 pm
by Green & Blue
Ok so after posting that signing Fulop would not fill me with confidence i notice the above post is confirming the deal.
Not sure about this at all,he may be playing international football but has not started a league game since 2007 when he was on loan at Leicester.(according to Wiki)
Best of luck to the lad but surely we could have done better.

Re: City to ask permission for Joe to come back [merged]

PostPosted: Tue Apr 27, 2010 8:36 pm
by lets all have a disco
From what i remember Fulop is a decent/ok ish shot stopper.

BUT...

Fuck it play Gunnar.

Re: City to ask permission for Joe to come back [merged]

PostPosted: Tue Apr 27, 2010 8:37 pm
by gillie
Green & Blue wrote:Ok so after posting that signing Fulop would not fill me with confidence i notice the above post is confirming the deal.
Not sure about this at all,he may be playing international football but has not started a league game since 2007 when he was on loan at Leicester.(according to Wiki)
Best of luck to the lad but surely we could have done better.

Mate he has played in the Prem for Sunderland this season.Dont believe Wiki lol.

Re: City to ask permission for Joe to come back [merged]

PostPosted: Tue Apr 27, 2010 8:37 pm
by avoidconfusion
lets all have a disco wrote:From what i remember Fulop is a decent shot stopper.

BUT...

Fuck it play Gunnar.


He is. And if I remember the Chelsea game correctly I don't think any of the goals were his faults, if anything he helped Sunderland not concede even more than 7.

Re: City to ask permission for Joe to come back [merged]

PostPosted: Tue Apr 27, 2010 8:39 pm
by carl_feedthegoat
Beefymcfc wrote:
carl_feedthegoat wrote:
avoidconfusion wrote:
carl_feedthegoat wrote:We better not loan out Hart or Weiss next season otherwise Ill be very very upset.


Me too. What do you say, you and me twatting Cook and Marwood if they do loan him out?


I dont like Cook.....Marwood brought in AJ...so I like him for now bugt cook is a Baffoon......till further notice.

But Cook brought Marwood in...........shakes head in bewilderment ;-)


fuck off Beefy.....it sounds right in my world.

If it all works out I might give him some credit as well..till then...

Re: City to ask permission for Joe to come back [merged]

PostPosted: Tue Apr 27, 2010 8:41 pm
by Green & Blue
gillie wrote:
Green & Blue wrote:Ok so after posting that signing Fulop would not fill me with confidence i notice the above post is confirming the deal.
Not sure about this at all,he may be playing international football but has not started a league game since 2007 when he was on loan at Leicester.(according to Wiki)
Best of luck to the lad but surely we could have done better.

Mate he has played in the Prem for Sunderland this season.Dont believe Wiki lol.


Yeah just looked him up on fantasy football hes let in more than his fair share if truth be told, we may need a plumber.

Re: City to ask permission for Joe to come back [merged]

PostPosted: Tue Apr 27, 2010 8:46 pm
by Sister of fu
Craig B wrote:


I'm a little bit more apprehensive about this than I was yesterday having seen how many goals he's let in for Sunderland this season.. can't remember the actual figure but it was a fair sum including 7 at Chelsea. Ah well, attack is the best form of defence and all that!



So your saying Sunderlands shite defense and a run of terrible form is all down to Fulup??? Lets give the guy a chance. I much prefer to sling someone in with a bit of prem experience than some kid we never new exsisted two weeks ago?!!!

Re: City to ask permission for Joe to come back [merged]

PostPosted: Tue Apr 27, 2010 8:50 pm
by ross.mcfc
Am I the only person that doesn’t think its right that we re-call Hart?

The rules state that we can sign a keeper in an emergency. Well we have a keeper who was deemed good enough to sit on our bench for the past 6 games who has been on our books for two years. The fact that we don’t think he is good enough is our fault. Not Birmingham’s or the FA’s.

We should be allowed to get someone in, but to sit on the bench only.

Re: City to ask permission for Joe to come back [merged]

PostPosted: Tue Apr 27, 2010 8:54 pm
by Beefymcfc
Green & Blue wrote:Ok so after posting that signing Fulop would not fill me with confidence i notice the above post is confirming the deal.
Not sure about this at all,he may be playing international football but has not started a league game since 2007 when he was on loan at Leicester.(according to Wiki)
Best of luck to the lad but surely we could have done better.

I think he's played about 15 games and conceded about 30!

Re: City to ask permission for Joe to come back [merged]

PostPosted: Tue Apr 27, 2010 8:54 pm
by carl_feedthegoat
ross.mcfc wrote:Am I the only person that doesn’t think its right that we re-call Hart?

The rules state that we can sign a keeper in an emergency. Well we have a keeper who was deemed good enough to sit on our bench for the past 6 games who has been on our books for two years. The fact that we don’t think he is good enough is our fault. Not Birmingham’s or the FA’s.

We should be allowed to get someone in, but to sit on the bench only.





We are all just pissed off mate and are looking for any excuse to bitch.(well I am) and I think that annoying cunt Alex McCleish whining for the last 2 months about wanting us to agree to Hart staying there next year has Irked a lot of fans.

In hindsight he should never have gone out in the first place.

Re: City to ask permission for Joe to come back [merged]

PostPosted: Tue Apr 27, 2010 8:58 pm
by Beefymcfc
ross.mcfc wrote:Am I the only person that doesn’t think its right that we re-call Hart?

The rules state that we can sign a keeper in an emergency. Well we have a keeper who was deemed good enough to sit on our bench for the past 6 games who has been on our books for two years. The fact that we don’t think he is good enough is our fault. Not Birmingham’s or the FA’s.

We should be allowed to get someone in, but to sit on the bench only.

I agree in principle Ross however the difference here is that Joe Hart is our player. If that is the case it should be down to the clubs involved in the contract rather than an outside body making a decision if it was fare or not.

One question you could ask is 'Would they have had the same thought process if he had just let in 5 against us?'.

Re: City to ask permission for Joe to come back [merged]

PostPosted: Tue Apr 27, 2010 9:04 pm
by daved
Hart going out on loan has helped him become a better keeper than he would have done as back up to Given. we will get a much improved keeper back for next season.