Original Dub wrote:Can anyone explain the referee's decisions for the entirety of the first half?
Yes, but people don't want to hear it.
Original Dub wrote:Can anyone explain the referee's decisions for the entirety of the first half?
Original Dub wrote:dave watson's perm wrote:If we could put the ball in the onion bag we wouldn't need to worry about this cunt in black.
I'd still be worried, even if we were one nil up.
We're down to ten men and the ref is allowing them to do whatever they fucking want.
Original Dub wrote:dave watson's perm wrote:If we could put the ball in the onion bag we wouldn't need to worry about this cunt in black.
I'd still be worried, even if we were one nil up.
We're down to ten men and the ref is allowing them to do whatever they fucking want.
PrezIke wrote:Mase wrote:STOP SAYING 'it was two footed'!!! THERES NO RULE AGAINST A TWO FOOTED CHALLENGE. ITS IF THE PLAYER DOESNT HAVE CONTROL OF THE TACKLE!
Two feet launched does not sound like one who is in control. That's the point when you use two feet. You are automatically risking a red.
It's as if you think there is really no chance he should have been sent off for what he did. Fern risked it with such a decision.
Original Dub wrote:Mase I'm with you pal. Very close to packing it in.
God's honest truth. Between the fans not caring and the totally unlevel playing field it's just become something that ruins the experience for me.
I'm clinging on but it's slipping away from me.
Beefymcfc wrote:Original Dub wrote:Can anyone explain the referee's decisions for the entirety of the first half?
Yes, but people don't want to hear it.
dave watson's perm wrote:Original Dub wrote:dave watson's perm wrote:If we could put the ball in the onion bag we wouldn't need to worry about this cunt in black.
I'd still be worried, even if we were one nil up.
We're down to ten men and the ref is allowing them to do whatever they fucking want.
Big team talk coming up.
zuricity wrote:PrezIke wrote:Mase wrote:STOP SAYING 'it was two footed'!!! THERES NO RULE AGAINST A TWO FOOTED CHALLENGE. ITS IF THE PLAYER DOESNT HAVE CONTROL OF THE TACKLE!
Two feet launched does not sound like one who is in control. That's the point when you use two feet. You are automatically risking a red.
It's as if you think there is really no chance he should have been sent off for what he did. Fern risked it with such a decision.
Are you watching the game ? Because if you are not you should shut up.
Ferds tackle was never ever a foul He was first to the ball and both sets of studs were pointing to the ground, not up at someone's leg.
He won the ball in time, the burnley player had lost control of the ball.
This referee has an agenda. He is worse than the Rag fan that reffed the Chelsea game.
Original Dub wrote:Mase I'm with you pal. Very close to packing it in.
God's honest truth. Between the fans not caring and the totally unlevel playing field it's just become something that ruins the experience for me.
I'm clinging on but it's slipping away from me.
mr_nool wrote:Seen the replay a few times now, and I've changed my mind to a yellow card. He doesn't catch him with his studs and actually is in control. The tackle on Sagna was just as bad or worse. Still, a very stupid challenge by Sagna.
Beefymcfc wrote:dave watson's perm wrote:Original Dub wrote:dave watson's perm wrote:If we could put the ball in the onion bag we wouldn't need to worry about this cunt in black.
I'd still be worried, even if we were one nil up.
We're down to ten men and the ref is allowing them to do whatever they fucking want.
Big team talk coming up.
I think Pep should go for a lie down and leave them to it. However, they're getting more and more wound up with the ref, and very understandable.
Regardless of the second half, enough is enough. Guardiola needs to bring it all out, back his players for getting angry at what they/we see as 2 different set of rules. Take the fine, take the fucking ban, just get in their fucking faces because if we continue to stand back and take it, the season has finished.
Original Dub wrote:Beefymcfc wrote:Original Dub wrote:Can anyone explain the referee's decisions for the entirety of the first half?
Yes, but people don't want to hear it.
It's always brushed under the rug. Every time people pretend it shouldn't matter if the ref is fucking us over.
He runs the fucking game ffs.
I know we're playing below par but I also know how different it would be if they weren't allowed a free assault in every tackle.
They have full protection ffs and we've none.
zuricity wrote:PrezIke wrote:Mase wrote:STOP SAYING 'it was two footed'!!! THERES NO RULE AGAINST A TWO FOOTED CHALLENGE. ITS IF THE PLAYER DOESNT HAVE CONTROL OF THE TACKLE!
Two feet launched does not sound like one who is in control. That's the point when you use two feet. You are automatically risking a red.
It's as if you think there is really no chance he should have been sent off for what he did. Fern risked it with such a decision.
Are you watching the game ? Because if you are not you should shut up.
Ferds tackle was never ever a foul He was first to the ball and both sets of studs were pointing to the ground, not up at someone's leg.
He won the ball in time, the burnley player had lost control of the ball.
This referee has an agenda. He is worse than the Rag fan that reffed the Chelsea game.
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot] and 112 guests