The mancityfans.net football forum

CTID Hants wrote:

carl_feedthegoat wrote:Take that.!!!

Didn't have you down as a fan.....

That goal saved me hitting something.

How on Earth did they got a freekick there? Rodri didn't touch him

Would love for the golden boot to come down to a battle between Kun and Raz.

It could actually happen.

Laporte is such an elegant defender

That's offsides, but the pen shout no way. Again, this is going to drive more and more fans bonkers.

Walker needs to be dropped. He was a liability last season and is the same this season.

Get cancelo or foden some game time

I'd almost forgotten just how much Mahrez kills our play

Otamendi a liability now

Well that looked a clear foul on Mahrez

(BBC) "Why no VAR penalty?
Bournemouth 1-3 Man City

A bit more on that VAR decision not to award Manchester City a penalty after he appeared to be brought down by Jefferson Lerma a little earlier in the half.

The appeal was considered not to be a penalty by the on-field referee. As a matter of course, the VAR checked it. We understand that, because this was a subjective decision, the VAR deemed that there was not enough evidence to overturn the original call and so stuck with the on-field decision."

"Subjective?" They've sure got it figured out. Fans will warm to VAR now we've had this explained.

Commentator just loves to mention the price of a substitute coming on....wont hear that with other teams...just ours.

PrezIke wrote:(BBC) "Why no VAR penalty?
Bournemouth 1-3 Man City

A bit more on that VAR decision not to award Manchester City a penalty after he appeared to be brought down by Jefferson Lerma a little earlier in the half.

The appeal was considered not to be a penalty by the on-field referee. As a matter of course, the VAR checked it. We understand that, because this was a subjective decision, the VAR deemed that there was not enough evidence to overturn the original call and so stuck with the on-field decision."

"Subjective?" They've sure got it figured out. Fans will warm to VAR now we've had this explained.

Heads they win, tails we lose w

PrezIke wrote:(BBC) "Why no VAR penalty?
Bournemouth 1-3 Man City

A bit more on that VAR decision not to award Manchester City a penalty after he appeared to be brought down by Jefferson Lerma a little earlier in the half.

The appeal was considered not to be a penalty by the on-field referee. As a matter of course, the VAR checked it. We understand that, because this was a subjective decision, the VAR deemed that there was not enough evidence to overturn the original call and so stuck with the on-field decision."

"Subjective?" They've sure got it figured out. Fans will warm to VAR now we've had this explained.

Stepping on someone's foot is not subjective

Sterling's hold up play is severely underrated.

Not the best start from Cancelo

bigblue wrote:

PrezIke wrote:(BBC) "Why no VAR penalty?
Bournemouth 1-3 Man City

A bit more on that VAR decision not to award Manchester City a penalty after he appeared to be brought down by Jefferson Lerma a little earlier in the half.

The appeal was considered not to be a penalty by the on-field referee. As a matter of course, the VAR checked it. We understand that, because this was a subjective decision, the VAR deemed that there was not enough evidence to overturn the original call and so stuck with the on-field decision."

"Subjective?" They've sure got it figured out. Fans will warm to VAR now we've had this explained.

Stepping on someone's foot is not subjective

Exactly!

Nice three points regardless of fucking var

carl_feedthegoat wrote:Commentator just loves to mention the price of a substitute coming on....wont hear that with other teams...just ours.

And the fact he cost us something like £26 million (net) doesn't seem to come into it with them.