Mase wrote:I don’t see how the Rags won the league last night when Arsenal have already won it?!
Dimples wrote:Anyone think Salah has lost a little bit of pace or is that wishful thinking by me?
No doubt about VVD, never recovered his pace after that injury, on the way down now.
Like last season, Liverpool are giving up a lot of clear goal chances but teams are taking them this season. Have they finally been found out?
Wonderwall wrote:Interesting quote from Mike Dean on the rashford offside goal. He said they have changed how they view offside this year using VAR. They have said if the lines drawn for defence and attack crossover in any way then the advantage is given to the attacker. Last season Rashford would have been offside, but not this season.
.WTAF??
It's like going on MS paint where you can choose the thickness of the nib you are drawing with these days.
For me Rashford looked very clearly offside and this new lines overlapping each other = onside will cause mayhem. Good news for Gabby Jesus though.... Oh well
carl_feedthegoat wrote:Wonderwall wrote:Interesting quote from Mike Dean on the rashford offside goal. He said they have changed how they view offside this year using VAR. They have said if the lines drawn for defence and attack crossover in any way then the advantage is given to the attacker. Last season Rashford would have been offside, but not this season.
.WTAF??
It's like going on MS paint where you can choose the thickness of the nib you are drawing with these days.
For me Rashford looked very clearly offside and this new lines overlapping each other = onside will cause mayhem. Good news for Gabby Jesus though.... Oh well
sickening this VAR and how the 'powers that be' interpret it for their particular agenda.
Dimples wrote:carl_feedthegoat wrote:Wonderwall wrote:Interesting quote from Mike Dean on the rashford offside goal. He said they have changed how they view offside this year using VAR. They have said if the lines drawn for defence and attack crossover in any way then the advantage is given to the attacker. Last season Rashford would have been offside, but not this season.
.WTAF??
It's like going on MS paint where you can choose the thickness of the nib you are drawing with these days.
For me Rashford looked very clearly offside and this new lines overlapping each other = onside will cause mayhem. Good news for Gabby Jesus though.... Oh well
sickening this VAR and how the 'powers that be' interpret it for their particular agenda.
It will probably only apply to two teams.
New interpretations seem to be revealed and explained to the public, after a situation that has benefited MU or Liverpool.
salford city wrote:Dimples wrote:carl_feedthegoat wrote:Wonderwall wrote:Interesting quote from Mike Dean on the rashford offside goal. He said they have changed how they view offside this year using VAR. They have said if the lines drawn for defence and attack crossover in any way then the advantage is given to the attacker. Last season Rashford would have been offside, but not this season.
.WTAF??
It's like going on MS paint where you can choose the thickness of the nib you are drawing with these days.
For me Rashford looked very clearly offside and this new lines overlapping each other = onside will cause mayhem. Good news for Gabby Jesus though.... Oh well
sickening this VAR and how the 'powers that be' interpret it for their particular agenda.
It will probably only apply to two teams.
New interpretations seem to be revealed and explained to the public, after a situation that has benefited MU or Liverpool.
I'd like to hear the commentary team remain silent during any VAR review there is no coincidence in them calling something and the outcome. Hinchcliffe on Sunday with his its a yellow for example. Probably would not change anything buy they ARE influencing the VAR without a doubt. This nonsense with the lines is mental - they show what suits them and there is no recourse - cheating in plain sight
patrickblue wrote:salford city wrote:Dimples wrote:carl_feedthegoat wrote:Wonderwall wrote:Interesting quote from Mike Dean on the rashford offside goal. He said they have changed how they view offside this year using VAR. They have said if the lines drawn for defence and attack crossover in any way then the advantage is given to the attacker. Last season Rashford would have been offside, but not this season.
.WTAF??
It's like going on MS paint where you can choose the thickness of the nib you are drawing with these days.
For me Rashford looked very clearly offside and this new lines overlapping each other = onside will cause mayhem. Good news for Gabby Jesus though.... Oh well
sickening this VAR and how the 'powers that be' interpret it for their particular agenda.
It will probably only apply to two teams.
New interpretations seem to be revealed and explained to the public, after a situation that has benefited MU or Liverpool.
I'd like to hear the commentary team remain silent during any VAR review there is no coincidence in them calling something and the outcome. Hinchcliffe on Sunday with his its a yellow for example. Probably would not change anything buy they ARE influencing the VAR without a doubt. This nonsense with the lines is mental - they show what suits them and there is no recourse - cheating in plain sight
The whole way they go about things is weird.
The one that continues to baffle me is the Rodri handball at Everton. When it happened the commentary (I had it on radio) said it was because of an Everton offside and play restarted with a City free kick, yet afterward when there was a debate about it, and MOTD had said it was handball and Everton should have had a penalty, the Ref, PGMOL or the FA never clarified anything, with the result it's still being brought up by bitter opposition fans an an example of City cheating.
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: city72, CTID Hants, Indianablue and 220 guests