PrezIke wrote:bigblue wrote:PrezIke wrote:(BBC) "Why no VAR penalty?
Bournemouth 1-3 Man City
A bit more on that VAR decision not to award Manchester City a penalty after he appeared to be brought down by Jefferson Lerma a little earlier in the half.
The appeal was considered not to be a penalty by the on-field referee. As a matter of course, the VAR checked it. We understand that, because this was a subjective decision, the VAR deemed that there was not enough evidence to overturn the original call and so stuck with the on-field decision."
"Subjective?" They've sure got it figured out. Fans will warm to VAR now we've had this explained.

Stepping on someone's foot is not subjective
Exactly!
Nor apparently is stepping on somebody’s
Heel ,When Sterling got his heel stamped on
Showing the replay The commentator said
Just a slight brush in the back no penalty there
Completely ignoring the heel stamp while he was looking at it fuckin hell