Page 2 of 4
Re: chelsea
Posted:
Thu Sep 03, 2009 1:12 pmby Original Dub
I don't think the FA can overturn this, but chelsea can appeal and we all know that means they'll only be banned for the January window, which means fuck all considering they didn't buy big this summer when they had more of a chance of signing big players.
Still, any bad press for rivals is goos and no matter what anyone says, negative press generally puts pressure on clubs and players... which is good for us.
Re: chelsea
Posted:
Thu Sep 03, 2009 1:14 pmby DoomMerchant
Dunne's Half-Time Pint wrote:CTID Hants wrote:Dunne's Half-Time Pint wrote:Piccsnumberoneblue wrote:Presumably this is right out of the blue. I can't remember reading anything about expecting major punishment for them.
However, are we whiter than white?
All those conspiracy theories about how Uefa and Fifa will stop us in our tracks, are we vulnerable?
On the face of it good news, but ...
It does seem a tad harsh by the way.
think it was the FA rather than UEFA or FIFA - not sure though yet - Chelski haven't responded yet on SSN.
Well if that's the case then it'll be overtuned by the FA within a fortnight, the spineless fuckers that they are!
h'apparently it was not the case - my mistake. It was some dispute resolution chamber affiliated with FIFA. SSN have just brought on a sports lawyer who's offered the following, quite brilliant, insight: "Chelsea will appeal".
are you suggesting you had better insight?
Re: chelsea
Posted:
Thu Sep 03, 2009 1:15 pmby Piccsnumberoneblue
They have a bit of previous for this. Remember they got done to the tune of 5m over the two kids from Leeds.
Re: chelsea
Posted:
Thu Sep 03, 2009 1:15 pmby Dunne's Half-Time Pint
DoomMerchant wrote:Dunne's Half-Time Pint wrote:CTID Hants wrote:Dunne's Half-Time Pint wrote:Piccsnumberoneblue wrote:Presumably this is right out of the blue. I can't remember reading anything about expecting major punishment for them.
However, are we whiter than white?
All those conspiracy theories about how Uefa and Fifa will stop us in our tracks, are we vulnerable?
On the face of it good news, but ...
It does seem a tad harsh by the way.
think it was the FA rather than UEFA or FIFA - not sure though yet - Chelski haven't responded yet on SSN.
Well if that's the case then it'll be overtuned by the FA within a fortnight, the spineless fuckers that they are!
h'apparently it was not the case - my mistake. It was some dispute resolution chamber affiliated with FIFA. SSN have just brought on a sports lawyer who's offered the following, quite brilliant, insight: "Chelsea will appeal".
are you suggesting you had better insight?
equal.
Re: chelsea
Posted:
Thu Sep 03, 2009 1:19 pmby DoomMerchant
Dunne's Half-Time Pint wrote:
equal.
Locke or Hobbes?
Re: chelsea
Posted:
Thu Sep 03, 2009 1:20 pmby Oooh Vonky Vonky
johnny99 wrote:banned from signing players for 2 transfer windows
sky sports newss
Take they can still sell players though ????
If so we could still sign Essien and Terry to help them out in Jan !!!
Re: chelsea
Posted:
Thu Sep 03, 2009 1:21 pmby Niall Quinns Discopants
Bottom line of course is, who the FUCK is Gael Kukuta?
I think they have taken tough stance on this one as this is hardly first time for Chelsea. There was obviously the Cashleygate and then all the hassle with Jon Obi Mikel where they sorted it by paying Rags 15m.
Re: chelsea
Posted:
Thu Sep 03, 2009 1:21 pmby Dunne's Half-Time Pint
DoomMerchant wrote:Dunne's Half-Time Pint wrote:
equal.
Locke or Hobbes?
That's the second time you've been too obscure for me. I haven't talked about those two cats since my degree.
Re: chelsea
Posted:
Thu Sep 03, 2009 1:24 pmby Dunne's Half-Time Pint
Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:Bottom line of course is, who the FUCK is Gael Kukuta?
I think they have taken tough stance on this one as this is hardly first time for Chelsea. There was obviously the Cashleygate and then all the hassle with Jon Obi Mikel where they sorted it by paying Rags 15m.
they've got footage of him skinning a couple of our academy/reserve lads on SSN - looks half decent to be fair - but hardly worth the bother.
Re: chelsea
Posted:
Thu Sep 03, 2009 1:24 pmby CITYSTEVEDON
oh dear, what are they going to do now, so next year lets get some players in who they wanted, like ribbery and they carnt do nothing about it. and ron, now what with you, you wanted to put a restition on us and now its you pmsl
Re: chelsea
Posted:
Thu Sep 03, 2009 1:25 pmby DoomMerchant
Dunne's Half-Time Pint wrote:DoomMerchant wrote:Dunne's Half-Time Pint wrote:
equal.
Locke or Hobbes?
That's the second time you've been too obscure for me. I haven't talked about those two cats since my degree.
cats? they dont play free jass, altho...Ornette Coleman would prollee choose Locke. And surprisingly Albert Ayler might skew Hobbes.
You've taken this to a whole 'nother level.
cheers
Re: chelsea
Posted:
Thu Sep 03, 2009 1:28 pmby Dunne's Half-Time Pint
DoomMerchant wrote:Dunne's Half-Time Pint wrote:DoomMerchant wrote:Dunne's Half-Time Pint wrote:
equal.
Locke or Hobbes?
That's the second time you've been too obscure for me. I haven't talked about those two cats since my degree.
cats? they dont play free jass, altho...Ornette Coleman would prollee choose Locke. And surprisingly Albert Ayler might skew Hobbes.
You've taken this to a whole 'nother level.
cheers
Re: chelsea
Posted:
Thu Sep 03, 2009 1:32 pmby DoomMerchant
Dunne's Half-Time Pint wrote:DoomMerchant wrote:Dunne's Half-Time Pint wrote:DoomMerchant wrote:Dunne's Half-Time Pint wrote:
equal.
Locke or Hobbes?
That's the second time you've been too obscure for me. I haven't talked about those two cats since my degree.
cats? they dont play free jass, altho...Ornette Coleman would prollee choose Locke. And surprisingly Albert Ayler might skew Hobbes.
You've taken this to a whole 'nother level.
cheers
laff. im the least likely person i know to stroke out. Take a different route to work or school everyday. Randomize some of your actions and interactions to really make your brain take different paths. Post random tangential shit on football forums, etc. It will be fine if you take that simple advice.
Re: chelsea
Posted:
Thu Sep 03, 2009 1:32 pmby spiv
That's shocking news, I hope they appeal against it and get another two transfer windows slapped on top
Re: chelsea
Posted:
Thu Sep 03, 2009 1:33 pmby Mase
Haven't they got loads of African players? What are they going to do in January when they all do one? Sturridge might actually get a game!
Re: chelsea
Posted:
Thu Sep 03, 2009 1:37 pmby PoC
hahaha this has made my day go on fifa!!!
i'm gonna have a nosey at the chelsea forums for a laugh
Re: chelsea
Posted:
Thu Sep 03, 2009 1:37 pmby 10.Goater_Legend
MaseCTID wrote:Haven't they got loads of African players? What are they going to do in January when they all do one? Sturridge might actually get a game!
Michael Essien
Didier Drogba
John Obi Mikel
Salomon Kalou
Re: chelsea
Posted:
Thu Sep 03, 2009 1:40 pmby lets all have a disco
If we can finish in top 4 this season then we can really turn the screw on ''the BIG sky doesnt really exist fucking four''.
Re: chelsea
Posted:
Thu Sep 03, 2009 1:45 pmby Pablo Sacramento
Dunne's Half-Time Pint wrote:Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:Bottom line of course is, who the FUCK is Gael Kukuta?
I think they have taken tough stance on this one as this is hardly first time for Chelsea. There was obviously the Cashleygate and then all the hassle with Jon Obi Mikel where they sorted it by paying Rags 15m.
they've got footage of him skinning a couple of our academy/reserve lads on SSN - looks half decent to be fair - but hardly worth the bother.
That will be in the match they lost to us as we won the FA youth cup final...........
always nice to bring that up.
Re: chelsea
Posted:
Thu Sep 03, 2009 2:01 pmby ronk
The might well appeal but a fat lot of good it will do them.
They've been caught before with Ashley Cole and received a suspended punishment. The there was the whole Mikel thing. They've had official complaints left, right and centre too.
Even closer to home, does anyone (anyone) believe that Sturridge wasn't approached illegally. Kakuta isn't some ordinary youth team player, they see him as another future star.
Chelsea have a big squad and they signed one player in the last window (+ Sturridge) and really only one the summer before (but they did try with Robinho).
Two windows without a signing mightn't effect them all that much.