The mancityfans.net football forum

blueday wrote:Do you seriously think the FA would bargin with City like that. Very much dounbt it.

Besides, it's sadly true that he stamped on Persi and so 3 match ban was a fair sentance.

Actually, I though Persi should have got 3 matches for the two footed tackle which lead to the incident, so was hoping that he'd be collared too.

crossan wrote:DON'T YOU JUST GET SICK OF PEOPLE WHO COME ON HERE BEING NOT ONLY NEGATIVE BUT POSTING WACKY RUMOURS.....THEY SHOULD BE BANNED.

johnpb78 wrote:

blueday wrote:Do you seriously think the FA would bargin with City like that. Very much dounbt it.

Besides, it's sadly true that he stamped on Persi and so 3 match ban was a fair sentance.

Actually, I though Persi should have got 3 matches for the two footed tackle which lead to the incident, so was hoping that he'd be collared too.

I think it is common knowledge that if you appeal or contest an FA charge which relates to a blatent offence, you will get fucked over big time when they find you guilty. There is/was no deal, this is how it has always worked.

Also on a PR front, city have done the right thing - we would have looked a right bunch of wankers had we contested the assault. Now, the celebration is an entirely different matter, and when the decision is made to screw us, I would fully expect an appeal based on historial evidence of treatment of similar incidents.

The fact that RSC is/may be crocked, and we are missing Adebayor, Tevez brings up an amazing fact - BELLAMY IS THE ONLY AVAILABLE STRIKER - who ever thought they would be saying that at the start of the season????

CITYTILLIDIE11 wrote:

Moonchesteri wrote:If you are not the same lad who posted in another thread RSC will be out for 8weeks I'm slightly worried about his recovery... Where's Douglas when you need him? ;o)

Still I feel the whole rumour is just usual bollocks.

Not me mate.

I heard a rumour he might have been making an appearance at the Derby ( lol),only tonight I heard that he won’t don’t know what to believe

You can take a lot of this stuff with a pinch of salt, whether it’s negative or not its only right to share with others what you hear.

CITYTILLIDIE11 wrote:

crossan wrote:DON'T YOU JUST GET SICK OF PEOPLE WHO COME ON HERE BEING NOT ONLY NEGATIVE BUT POSTING WACKY RUMOURS.....THEY SHOULD BE BANNED.

Do me a favour pal and turn your caps lock off.

There’s No need to shout.

CITYTILLIDIE11 wrote:I have just heard this rumour

Apparently

The FA made it clear to City that if they dragged out Adebayors case he would receive a minimum 6 game ban at the end of it if found guilty, City could not afford to lose Adebayor for 6 games so opted for the no contest and took the 3 game ban rather than running the risk of a 6 game ban, the main reason for City conceding and offering no contest was the lack of fitness of RSC who is apparently no where near first team fitness. And wont be playing any time soon, I don’t know about you guys it explains things a bit better to me.

Will be interesting to see how Adebayor feels about it all,and whether he agrees with the clubs descision not to contest the case against him.

It leaves a bad taste in the mouth if true, basically because Hughes signed a crock we have to throw the towel in at the earliest oppertunity and just take it because we cant run the risk of the 6 game ban because we have no fcuking strikers.

CITYTILLIDIE11 wrote:

ross.mcfc wrote:CITYTILLIDIE11 is one doom and gloom merchant. Every one hates us blah blah. Im convinced he's a Scousers.

Lmao,yeah sure if you say so DROSS.

What’s your contribution, other than trolling and attention whoring for a response?