The mancityfans.net football forum

Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:He can't answer right now. He has his mouth full of Bluemoon cock.

Maybe you can coax him back?

Dunne's Half-Time Pint wrote:

Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:He can't answer right now. He has his mouth full of Bluemoon cock.

Maybe you can coax him back?

Or not??? Why would we want people from "That Site" over here?? Don't get me wrong theres a few good posters but theirs a load of crocks over there too.

Vhero wrote:

Dunne's Half-Time Pint wrote:

Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:He can't answer right now. He has his mouth full of Bluemoon cock.

Maybe you can coax him back?

Or not??? Why would we want people from "That Site" over here?? Don't get me wrong theres a few good posters but theirs a load of crocks over there too.

where do i start?

Dunne's Half-Time Pint wrote:

Vhero wrote:

Dunne's Half-Time Pint wrote:

Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:He can't answer right now. He has his mouth full of Bluemoon cock.

Maybe you can coax him back?

Or not??? Why would we want people from "That Site" over here?? Don't get me wrong theres a few good posters but theirs a load of crocks over there too.

where do i start?

The bar :)

Dunne's Half-Time Pint wrote:

Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:He can't answer right now. He has his mouth full of Bluemoon cock.

Maybe you can coax him back?

Do we need him anymore than any other person. Personally I was sad to see likes of DannyD go to Bluemoon but it's all down to personal preference, right? In fact, the most sad I was when some of the people who were to set up Citymancs left. There were some good posters there.

Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:

Dunne's Half-Time Pint wrote:

Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:He can't answer right now. He has his mouth full of Bluemoon cock.

Maybe you can coax him back?

Do we need him anymore than any other person?

by miles... Basically calling him a cocksucker is pretty shambolic when he has the potential to add a great deal more than all but a few posters, even if it is only on occasion: you sound more like a petulant teenage than a site moderator.

Dunne's Half-Time Pint wrote:

Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:

Dunne's Half-Time Pint wrote:

Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:He can't answer right now. He has his mouth full of Bluemoon cock.

Maybe you can coax him back?

Do we need him anymore than any other person?

by miles... Basically calling him a cocksucker is pretty shambolic when he has the potential to add a great deal more than all but a few posters, even if it is only on occasion: you sound more like a petulant teenage than a site moderator.

What has he added in his 50 posts? Announcements that there are streams available in official site for certain pre season friendlies. Copy some John68's posts. Can't see anything too insightfull there.

One of the beauties of this site for me is that all people are equal here and everyone's entitled to their opinion. Could be the roots of this site as International Supporters message board about decade or so ago. Of course there are few individual posters who feel they are above everyone else and bigger Blues because they are (in some cases occasionally) in position to get to see City play live more than others but generally that feller from Nepal is treated equally to other people. There are other sites that take sterner approach to this subject. Some exclusively meant for Super Blue born and bread Mancs.

You sound like someone who is trying to suck up to your boss in office rather than site legend.

Yes Antii, but I still fail to see what you and we have to GAIN from calling him a cocksucker.

Slim wrote:Yes Antii, but I still fail to see what you and we have to GAIN from calling him a cocksucker.

I undestand NQDP's sentiment on the original post, however, I also agree with you. WOW

Slim wrote:Yes Antii, but I still fail to see what you and we have to GAIN from calling him a cocksucker.

That was of course a (harsh) joke. I thought that was quite clear.

Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:

Slim wrote:Yes Antii, but I still fail to see what you and we have to GAIN from calling him a cocksucker.

That was of course a (harsh) joke. I thought that was quite clear.

I thought it was, but then you defended it like it wasn't. You can be confusing some times.

Dunne's Half-Time Pint wrote:

Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:

Dunne's Half-Time Pint wrote:

Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:He can't answer right now. He has his mouth full of Bluemoon cock.

Maybe you can coax him back?

Do we need him anymore than any other person?

by miles... Basically calling him a cocksucker is pretty shambolic when he has the potential to add a great deal more than all but a few posters, even if it is only on occasion: you sound more like a petulant teenage than a site moderator.

Mr Nield takes more from this site than he adds IMO. He nicked John68's report on the league winning game and put it on the OS without even mentioning this site. It is common internet courtesy to acknowledge another site if you use stuff from it. He came up with some convoluted story about wanting the article to be from a fan rather than from a site... then a few days later gave yet another plug to the Bluemoon site because some kid on there had designed a new flag!!!

When it comes to his relationship with the Bluemoon forum I would describe him more of an arse-kisser than a cock-sucker.

I'm sure once Mr Nield views this thread he will be convinced that this is the place for him. He will feel the warmth emanating from within and feel really welcome here.

He hasn't treated us badly, so why the hate towards him? Just because he posts on Bluemoon so fucking what. There are many posters here who use both sites, do we call them all cocksuckers, or is it only club officials we aren't suppose to accept it from?

Would Paul Lake get called a cocksucker in jest or otherwise if he was to post here? Not that I can see that ever happening if he happens to view threads like this.

Blue Toy wrote:I'm sure once Mr Nield views this thread he will be convinced that this is the place for him. He will feel the warmth emanating from within and feel really welcome here.

He hasn't treated us badly, so why the hate towards him? Just because he posts on Bluemoon so fucking what. There are many posters here who use both sites, do we call them all cocksuckers, or is it only club officials we aren't suppose to accept it from?

Would Paul Lake get called a cocksucker in jest or otherwise if he was to post here? Not that I can see that ever happening if he happens to view threads like this.

A) Chris Nields isn't Paul Lake
B) Paul Lake was called more or less cock sucker in Blue Moon when he tried to get opinions from there for his radio show
C) Where has anyone called Blue Moon posters "cock suckers"?
D) The point is that Blue Moon has been chosen to be "official mouth piece for fans". I think we are happy with our status as independent supporters site. People have to remember that one of the biggest booststo get the site to form it is now was born out right to call Gordon Strachan "Ginger Munich twat". Which he is.

Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:A) Chris Nields isn't Paul Lake
B) Paul Lake was called more or less cock sucker in Blue Moon when he tried to get opinions from there for his radio show
C) Where has anyone called Blue Moon posters "cock suckers"?
D) The point is that Blue Moon has been chosen to be "official mouth piece for fans". I think we are happy with our status as independent supporters site. People have to remember that one of the biggest booststo get the site to form it is now was born out right to call Gordon Strachan "Ginger Munich twat". Which he is.

A. My point exactly. So why call one but not the other? (Hypothetically speaking of course).
B. I can't comment on something I am not aware of.
C. Apologies. You called Chris Nield a Cocksucker... That makes it OK?
D. You're obviously not happy with our status vs. their status, hence the way this thread has gone.

Let me make it clear, I am not defending nor attacking Chris Nield, my concern is the wellbeing of this site and I don't believe calling an employee of MCFC a cocksucker does us any good when he hasn't done anything wrong.

Bluemoon is the most pathetic city site I've ever seen.

Its fucking ridiculous and near impossible to have a reasonable, intelligent debate about city.

It saddens me that kids and Wind Up Merchants can not only pollute a website so badly, but can also convince the guys who run our official website that they are our mouth piece.

Hey Chris, will you put this post up on the OS?

Cheers mate.

Original Dub wrote:Bluemoon is the most pathetic city site I've ever seen.

Its fucking ridiculous and near impossible to have a reasonable, intelligent debate about city.

It saddens me that kids and Wind Up Merchants can not only pollute a website so badly, but can also convince the guys who run our official website that they are our mouth piece.

Hey Chris, will you put this post up on the OS?

Cheers mate.

I agree. For example Ric opened up a 'transfer forum' which is really code for 'bullshit in here' about 10 months ago.

It already has a quarter of posts as the main fucking 'bluemoon forum'. So far 5949. Imagine how much bollocks is in there.

The OS staff should save themselves a lot of time and read our forum.

edge275 wrote:

Original Dub wrote:Bluemoon is the most pathetic city site I've ever seen.

Its fucking ridiculous and near impossible to have a reasonable, intelligent debate about city.

It saddens me that kids and Wind Up Merchants can not only pollute a website so badly, but can also convince the guys who run our official website that they are our mouth piece.

Hey Chris, will you put this post up on the OS?

Cheers mate.

I agree. For example Ric opened up a 'transfer forum' which is really code for 'bullshit in here' about 10 months ago.

It already has a quarter of posts as the main fucking 'bluemoon forum'. So far 5949. Imagine how much bollocks is in there.

The OS staff should save themselves a lot of time and read our forum.

Edge-sactly

Original Dub wrote:Bluemoon is the most pathetic city site I've ever seen.

Its fucking ridiculous and near impossible to have a reasonable, intelligent debate about city.

It saddens me that kids and Wind Up Merchants can not only pollute a website so badly, but can also convince the guys who run our official website that they are our mouth piece.

Hey Chris, will you put this post up on the OS?

Cheers mate.

Simply really why Bluemoon was chosen and not this site. It's called traffic.

JamieMCFC wrote:

Original Dub wrote:Bluemoon is the most pathetic city site I've ever seen.

Its fucking ridiculous and near impossible to have a reasonable, intelligent debate about city.

It saddens me that kids and Wind Up Merchants can not only pollute a website so badly, but can also convince the guys who run our official website that they are our mouth piece.

Hey Chris, will you put this post up on the OS?

Cheers mate.

Simply really why Bluemoon was chosen and not this site. It's called traffic.

There's 71 people online right now. There are new posts and topics posted everyday. Whats the difference between say 100 here and 200 on Bluemoon?

I'll tell you, quality.