villa was there for the taking

Here is the place to talk about all things city and football!

Re: villa was there for the taking

Postby saulman » Wed Dec 29, 2010 9:13 am

CITYSTEVEDON wrote:so why didnt we kill them off, 4-0 up with 30 mins + and we just tried to keep the ball. passing back all the bloody time, we must have had 20 passes in our own half and didnt go forward. ive seen better teams then villa who we have beat 4-0, but the other team played a lot better then villa. we should of gone at them more and tried to score a couple more goals, i know im moaning at winning 4-0 but we really need to score more goals.


At 4-0 up, City can do whatever they like for me. I wish it were like that every game.
Has the world gone mad, ..............or is it me?
User avatar
saulman
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Dickov's Injury Time Equaliser
 
Posts: 4906
Joined: Fri May 25, 2007 8:59 am
Location: The Sticks

Re: villa was there for the taking

Postby Fish111 » Wed Dec 29, 2010 9:19 am

I was actually bored after 55 minutes, we were that good. That was the most abject Villa performance i have ever seen in my life but i'm not complaining.
User avatar
Fish111
Rosler's Grandad Bombed The Swamp
 
Posts: 3999
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2008 7:09 pm
Supporter of: The Citizens
My favourite player is: Bell & Silva

Re: villa was there for the taking

Postby CityFanFromRome » Wed Dec 29, 2010 9:37 am

Fish111 wrote:I was actually bored after 55 minutes, we were that good. That was the most abject Villa performance i have ever seen in my life but i'm not complaining.

Boring Boring City takes a new meaning ;)
User avatar
CityFanFromRome
Joe Hart's 29 Clean Sheets
 
Posts: 5129
Joined: Sun Dec 28, 2008 6:20 pm
Location: Rome
Supporter of: Man City & Roma
My favourite player is: Carlos Tévez

Previous

Return to The Maine Football forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: salford city and 186 guests