by gary james » Thu Mar 03, 2011 12:30 pm
A few things worth noting....
The document focuses on the name Eastlands for the area, not Sportcity (I think this shows City's input).
Also, the simple line that says that the old Clayton Aniline site ("Openshaw West") is bigger than Phillips Park - it puts it all into perspective. Compare the size of that with training facilities at other clubs, never mind the quality of what will appear within that complex, and you can sense the scale of what the Club are trying to achieve and the way they are developing.
Some of us have been going on for some time that the development of MCFC is not simply about buying a few expensive players and winning the odd trophy, it's about creating a fully sustainable and successful club for the future.
At my talk at Waterstones on derby eve I hinted at the scale of what's to come and that guy who claimed to be a trainee journalist (he was a Red) sort of laughed and poured scorn on it all, suggesting we're buying success and that's that. Someone else suggested we're spending to catch up with Utd but didn't recognise that it's more about the off-the-pitch developments that will make the difference longer term.
Here are the first indications of what's to follow.
Had City not won the 1999 play off then the COM stadium would not have been built at that level - highly significant. Now a little over a decade later, City's owner and visionary leaders have managed to develop such a strong partnership with Manchester CC that the Club is playing a key part in the redevelopment of a significant part of the City.
I can't think of anywhere else in the UK (and possibly Europe) where a football club has been able to set the agenda for a significant development programme (possibly the most significant) - usually sports clubs benefit or become anchor tenants; they're not the visionaries.
I've said it before and it's worth saying again.... In 20 years time I'm convinced City will be held up as the example that all football clubs should follow. Forget on the pitch success (that will come) City will be a model because of the investment in Manchester, people, fans, facilities, sporting vision and so on. City's community heritage will help shape the future.
This is happening. Ignore all those journalists and non-City fans who go on about how much Tevez cost/buying success/off the pitch issues etc. - all of those points are irrelevant. City had to face these issues to make an impression. We are where we are. But the future.... for the first time since the 1920s/30s City have a real long term plan. Do City's rivals?
Personally, I reckon no other PL team has a medium term plan, never mind long term (think about it Spurs/WHam arguing about Olympic stadium; Utd's debts; Everton/Liverpool ground probs etc.).
Latest book "Manchester The City Years" - the full story of the Blues from the 1860s through to QPR 2012
Find out more about my writing/books:
http://www.facebook.com/GaryJames4Twitter: @GaryJamesWriter