roblues wrote:Goataldo wrote:Ted Hughes wrote:I thought he worked much harder than he has done in recent times & did a decent job, including keeping his head & setting up Tevez for what should have been the 1st goal. Got tackled a couple of times in bad positions but not as often as many others. His closing down was particularly valuable for a side containing Yaya & Vieira.
Have to agree with your sentiments.
He put a decent shift in, and though by no means MoM, he did more good than bad imo.
Same here. Can't see why it would be his last start when he offers as much, if not more, than any of the currently available replacements in his position.
sweenyuk wrote:He is trying to play the Manchini way of passing rather than running with the ball, it just does not suit him
mr_nool wrote:After having only seen the highlights SWP looked good and very involved. So was he actually crap for the 80 other minutes of the game?
dazby wrote:Sweep will either score or set up a very very very important goal for us. When this occurs the haters will be feeling very very very sheepish.
Slim wrote:Sorry dazby, when he did is round the corner flick and chase, the old sweep would have skipped away like the defender was in reverse, he didn't and was caught easily. This is not a match fitness thing, this is the pace no longer being there. As much as I hate to agree with anyone(cause I'm always right and people agree with me), Ruthless has it on the money here.
Rag_hater wrote:Seems to be trendy to slag of SWP.
Yesterday he didn't do much wrong.
And if you compare him with AJ,I'd say there is no differece
blues2win wrote:I still see the main reason for playing SWP is because we need someone who can get behind a defence and deliver a decent ball into the box. A wide midfielder, unless he's Beckham at his peak, has to be able to deliver a decent cross and needs pace and/ or trickery to get past his man at least occasionally. Just look at the stick Milner gets in that position precisely because he can't do that. Just playing SWP because he tracks back and defends isn't viable especially when we have two defensive midfielders playing virtually every match. How are we going to score goals on that basis? AJ is miles more of an attacking threat because he can beat men repeatedly and makes good runs onto through balls through the centre. As Doug says, though, he doesn't put in many good crosses either but there's still time for him to learn. When AJ's back SWP is bound to be pushed down the pecking order again.
On Thursday if it's a choice between SWP and Balotelli, the Italian would get my vote every time because there's always a chance he'll score. We are 2 behind remember!
blues2win wrote:Crosses don't have to be onto Tevez's head. They can be fizzed low across the box like the one Kolarov put in which the defender sliced over the bar. Dare I say it Yaya could just occasionally get into the box and put his nut on one! That's me being optimistic! As for AJ playing on the wrong side there's no reason why he can't cut in and chip one with his left. There again is it too much to expect highly paid players to play with both feet FFS. I guess so.
Aren't you concerned at all that we play everything in front of the Opposition? It makes it so much easier for teams to defend against us with relative comfort. We're crying out for players to get behind teams but it rarely seems to happen.
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: CTID Hants, Google [Bot] and 220 guests