Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:twosips wrote:The thing is, there are lots of good managers in world football, but most just don't get the time they deserve. Fortunately for us we have an excellent chairman who is willing to back Mancini and understand that these things don't happen in a heartbeat. This team is growing with every passing month, and it's actually startling when you think of the level of football we play now compared to a couple of years ago. I love it - its almost Barca-esque in its probing manner. Very continental, but when its done well its unplayable.
See while I agree that when you have right man in charge you need to show patience, I disagree with people who say that we need to give time for any old fool.
It's a well known fact that I was one of the people who campaigned for Mancini for few years before we appointed him(yes, I do feel certain degree of smugness about it now.....deal with it). I've also been one of his biggest supporters here. I thought he was THE man for us. But Mancini had excellent resumé having been success and winning stuff in many clubs before us. He had done it all before and was still relatively young + he lacks CL which I think will be his motivation. BUT if you don't buy into him being the man then I don't see why people should just go and say "time will make him good".
One of the most important things what Mancini has done, what has saved his job and made him cemented for the job for a good while, he DELIVERED. Owners put targets in front of him and he reached them. Both in his first half a season and then in his first full season. But if he wasn't giving owners any return or showing supporters that he can do it then why just hang on to him in desperate hope it will all turn out well.
When compared to a lot of the divisive stuff which has been thrown around here in our days of celebration - dredging up old threads etc - that is a very fair minded post of yours.
Thanks Antii
And you're entitled to feel smug (but only a little bit) ;-)