Sunderland were reluctant to sell the homegrown talent [Henderson]
Mark ( Blue Army ) wrote:Sunderland have confirmed that they have agreed a fee with Liverpool for Jordan Henderson. List updated
http://www.skysports.com/story/0,,20876_6970320,00.html
aaron bond wrote:Mark ( Blue Army ) wrote:Sunderland have confirmed that they have agreed a fee with Liverpool for Jordan Henderson. List updated
http://www.skysports.com/story/0,,20876_6970320,00.html
£20m is an absolutely ridiculous fee, just like £35m for Carroll was. Liverpool might be spending money but at the moment I can't see how this it going to propel them back into the group of elite teams. We paid £6m for AJ who was probably at the same stage of his career when we bought him as Henderson and Carroll were when Liverpool bought them.
If you're paying such high fees, you should be getting world class talent. Liverpool paid £55m for Henderson and Carroll, we paid £50m for Tevez and Silva.
bobby brows wrote:aaron bond wrote:Mark ( Blue Army ) wrote:Sunderland have confirmed that they have agreed a fee with Liverpool for Jordan Henderson. List updated
http://www.skysports.com/story/0,,20876_6970320,00.html
£20m is an absolutely ridiculous fee, just like £35m for Carroll was. Liverpool might be spending money but at the moment I can't see how this it going to propel them back into the group of elite teams. We paid £6m for AJ who was probably at the same stage of his career when we bought him as Henderson and Carroll were when Liverpool bought them.
If you're paying such high fees, you should be getting world class talent. Liverpool paid £55m for Henderson and Carroll, we paid £50m for Tevez and Silva.
And people wonder why british clubs choose to look abroad!
I remember Sven getting criticised for bringing 8 foreign players in and said that he'd inquired about 4 england players, was told two were not for sale and was quoted astronimical prices for the other 2.
I'll take Dave Silva over anyone in the England team any day
Bridge'srightfoot wrote:Only good signings Sven made were Petrov and Corluka.
Geovanni actually was a very good player when he played, but i'll never understand why he didn't play more.
ronk wrote:Bridge'srightfoot wrote:Only good signings Sven made were Petrov and Corluka.
Geovanni actually was a very good player when he played, but i'll never understand why he didn't play more.
I don't see it that way. Sven was building for the longer term, not all the signings were immediate. Elano was a success under Sven, a big one. He was even a success at first for Hughes and it really only soured as the project changed from the one he was signed for.
Can Bojinov be considered a bad signing because he was freakishly unlucky with injuries? Bianchi certainly didn't work out, but some of the others have done okay over time: Caicedo has proven his ability, we made a profit on Garrido and Gelson was maturing last I saw of him.
Sven gelled the team together well initially and we were building a team with potential. That they didn't fit into the change of plans doesn't mean they were bad.
Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:
Exactly spot on Ronk.
It's easy to say NOW that we are where we are with the money we have got that "they were all crap". Sure, we didn't have Silva or Tevez or Kompany but we were in COMPLETELY different position when Sven took over. Our team was in shambles when Pearce left and Sven had couple of WEEKS to build a team that could stay up. Not only did he do that but took us to upper midtable. I repeat, he had couple of WEEKS to build that team.
Do some people think that Sven couldn't identify talent like Tevez and instead brought Bianchi in?
ronk wrote:Bridge'srightfoot wrote:Only good signings Sven made were Petrov and Corluka.
Geovanni actually was a very good player when he played, but i'll never understand why he didn't play more.
I don't see it that way. Sven was building for the longer term, not all the signings were immediate. [highlight]Elano was a success under Sven, a big one. He was even a success at first for Hughes and it really only soured as the project changed from the one he was signed for.[/highlight]
Can Bojinov be considered a bad signing because he was freakishly unlucky with injuries? Bianchi certainly didn't work out, but some of the others have done okay over time: Caicedo has proven his ability, we made a profit on Garrido and Gelson was maturing last I saw of him.
Sven gelled the team together well initially and we were building a team with potential. That they didn't fit into the change of plans doesn't mean they were bad.
kennyboy wrote:http://www.click-manchester.com/sport/manchester-city/1213299-manchester-city-sign-feyenoord-wunderkid-karim-rekik.html
yeeeyyyyy
Wonderwall wrote:kennyboy wrote:http://www.click-manchester.com/sport/manchester-city/1213299-manchester-city-sign-feyenoord-wunderkid-karim-rekik.html
yeeeyyyyy
I know absolutely ZERO about the yougsters we are bringing in, lets hope our scouting network is starting to get us some future gems
Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:Wonderwall wrote:kennyboy wrote:http://www.click-manchester.com/sport/manchester-city/1213299-manchester-city-sign-feyenoord-wunderkid-karim-rekik.html
yeeeyyyyy
I know absolutely ZERO about the yougsters we are bringing in, lets hope our scouting network is starting to get us some future gems
Like I said at the time, new squad rules would only lead into this and ones suffering will be the players. Rich clubs will bring in kids before they turn 18 so that they will be counted as "homegrown". Some of them will make it, most will not. Problem is that these kids will be left without proper education or anything to fall back to.
Another fucking stupid, shortsighted UEFA rule.
Esky wrote:Demba Ba's signed a 3 year deal with Newcastle.
The Nolan move is still a mystery to me but Ba is a good capture by Pardew.
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 103 guests