Mancini or Mourinho?

[thegoatfeeder]

FFS, this is City who are riding Top all season bar two weeks and haven't done for the best part of 35 years and some want Moanreen in who will undoubtedly fuck off after 2 years anyway? .... bonkers stuff, some are getting more raglike by the day, seriously it's a worry City fans even think this way.

10000% this. I realise you can't get more than 100% but in this case you can.

[gillie]

FFS, this is City who are riding Top all season bar two weeks and haven't done for the best part of 35 years and some want Moanreen in who will undoubtedly fuck off after 2 years anyway? .... bonkers stuff, some are getting more raglike by the day, seriously it's a worry City fans even think this way.

Well said Chinners mate to think just over a decade ago our fans could have looked forward to playing the likes of York and Oldham.Now we get knocked off top spot in the prem for the first time in months and suddenly the guy who guided us there is no good anymore.You are right mate more raglike every fuckin time we dont win people should be ashamed of themselves.

[DoomMerchant]

Is this a joke?
Mourinho is a better manager he hasnt gone a full calender year without winning at least one pot in his whole career.

it is a joke. and people say that he's defensive oriented? he's a fucking artist who's now got his third, wait, fuck me, fourth team playing in a different style suited to what's in demand and poised to vie for a 3rd CL trophy with his third different team. If you look at that Real team and think it's "defensive oriented" then you need your fucking head examined.

Mancini has done fuckall compared to Jose. This, fortunately for Roberto, is true of pretty much every other manager sans Bacon as well, so...he's in good company.

cheers

[ashton287]

Will make my mind up at the end of the season. We lift the trophy and we stick with Mancini. We don't (it will be his fault as our away form has been shite and he hasn't doe anything about it) and we get mourinho in but only if he can bring ronaldo with him.

[PeterParker]

We need to understand that we aren't playing York, Oldham or Chesterfield. We had grown as a club, we are at a different level at this moment and it's absolutely normal to have higher hopes and expectations.
At this moment we are the club that everyone in the world fears, the club that can buy any player and beside that, has one of the best board staff in the world, with people that knew what they are doing and made us be a really important club in marketing and so on.

We need titles, we need cups, to grow bigger and bigger. Just going in Europe year after year, isn't enough.

[Beefymcfc]

What is such the diference with Mancini and Mourinho, can't Mancini catch him up?

What did Mourinho achieve before he got his break and going on to spending the earth on players?

Did the Special one win everything without the backing of money?

Please educate me, I'm all ears.

At Porto, yes, there he did.

Porto was a similar case to Chelsea. A very good team that just needed minor tweaking to get them to the top. He did very well though and I can see Mancini doing just as well with the same resources. Jose didn't win the CL with Chelsea, despite all the money, and was in serious decline when he left. He seemed to have lost the plot and was no use to man nor beast yet because he was a media darling he was hailed again as the second coming.

The British media love his antics, just like they do with 'Arry, and that's why they are lauding his comeback, they need to fill the back pages.

[DoomMerchant]

What is such the diference with Mancini and Mourinho, can't Mancini catch him up?

What did Mourinho achieve before he got his break and going on to spending the earth on players?

Did the Special one win everything without the backing of money?

Please educate me, I'm all ears.

At Porto, yes, there he did.

Porto was a similar case to Chelsea. A very good team that just needed minor tweaking to get them to the top. He did very well though and I can see Mancini doing just as well with the same resources. Jose didn't win the CL with Chelsea, despite all the money, and was in serious decline when he left. He seemed to have lost the plot and was no use to man nor beast yet because he was a media darling he was hailed again as the second coming.

The British media love his antics, just like they do with 'Arry, and that's why they are lauding his comeback, they need to fill the back pages.

chelsea weren't in *serious* decline when he left. Anchovi basically won the league two years later with Jose's team, did he not?

btw i liked Roberto's post match interview...if he can get through to these cunts we've still got a chance.

[feedthegreek]

if we were in the same position as we are now with mourinhio in charge, would you be more confident or less confident of winning the league? personally i would be more confident.

[mir.sad]

I've gone for Mancini. Too pissed off to argue with any cunt though, so just all of you assume I'm right ........ cos I am.

dzeko is the best player in mcfc
http://www.castrolfootball.com/rankings/rankings/
statistic is unrelenting

[DoomMerchant]

I've gone for Mancini. Too pissed off to argue with any cunt though, so just all of you assume I'm right ........ cos I am.

dzeko is the best player in mcfc
http://www.castrolfootball.com/rankings/rankings/
statistic is unrelenting

you have a fantastically accurate username.

cheers

[PeterParker]

What is such the diference with Mancini and Mourinho, can't Mancini catch him up?

What did Mourinho achieve before he got his break and going on to spending the earth on players?

Did the Special one win everything without the backing of money?

Please educate me, I'm all ears.

At Porto, yes, there he did.

Porto was a similar case to Chelsea. A very good team that just needed minor tweaking to get them to the top. He did very well though and I can see Mancini doing just as well with the same resources. Jose didn't win the CL with Chelsea, despite all the money, and was in serious decline when he left. He seemed to have lost the plot and was no use to man nor beast yet because he was a media darling he was hailed again as the second coming.

The British media love his antics, just like they do with 'Arry, and that's why they are lauding his comeback, they need to fill the back pages.

At Chelsea no one will manage to win the Chumps, while they are owned by that lunatic. To be fair to him, at Chelsea he won 5 trophies (if i recall right) and at Porto, well it was Porto and he won Uefa Cup and Champions League in two consecutive years. After he left from Porto, only Deco and Ricardo Carvalho stepped up as a high level. Derlei, Postiga, Nuno Valente, Paulo Fereira, Carlos Alberto, etc, they failed to deliver.
Yes, he is a media delight, if you ask me, a pale copy of Cloughie, but he is the best one out there.

And to the example where Chelsea and Inter, had poor moments after he left, i think it's because he used his players and squad 200% taking the best from them.

And of course, he knows how to put pressure on those bent fucks from FA, and altough i don't like this tactic, i am aware that you can only beat filth with their own weapons.

[Beefymcfc]

What is such the diference with Mancini and Mourinho, can't Mancini catch him up?

What did Mourinho achieve before he got his break and going on to spending the earth on players?

Did the Special one win everything without the backing of money?

Please educate me, I'm all ears.

At Porto, yes, there he did.

Porto was a similar case to Chelsea. A very good team that just needed minor tweaking to get them to the top. He did very well though and I can see Mancini doing just as well with the same resources. Jose didn't win the CL with Chelsea, despite all the money, and was in serious decline when he left. He seemed to have lost the plot and was no use to man nor beast yet because he was a media darling he was hailed again as the second coming.

The British media love his antics, just like they do with 'Arry, and that's why they are lauding his comeback, they need to fill the back pages.

chelsea weren't in *serious* decline when he left. Anchovi basically won the league two years later with Jose's team, did he not?

btw i liked Roberto's post match interview...if he can get through to these cunts we've still got a chance.

I didn't say Chelsea were, I said Mourinho was. Remember how they started that season and how Jose's interviews got more and more vile?

[Ted Hughes]

Bob.

[King Kev]

Roberto please.

[Beefymcfc]

That's 2 more for Bobby Mancini but I've not heard too many arguments in favour of Moroniho yet so it looks settled.

6 in favour of The Special One, why; because he's special?

[King Kev]

6 in favour of The Special One, why; because he's special?

Because sometimes people can be reactionary ungrateful pillocks.

[Beefymcfc]

6 in favour of The Special One, why; because he's special?

Because sometimes people can be reactionary ungrateful pillocks.

I like the non-bullshit tone of your views. Cheers KK.

[OliverHardy]

<null>

You twat

[Beefymcfc]

<null>

You twat

Usually I like to know why soomeone calls me a twat but because I like you I'll just take the <Null> as a compliment ;-)

[OliverHardy]

I love you too beefy but why bring this up after one bad game? I mean. He has brought us to where we are, why turn our back on him before he has won the league for us? Football is in a sad place when we as fans are even raising these types of questions at this point of the season? Sorry for the initial insult.