Beefymcfc wrote:PeterParker wrote:Beefymcfc wrote:What is such the diference with Mancini and Mourinho, can't Mancini catch him up?
What did Mourinho achieve before he got his break and going on to spending the earth on players?
Did the Special one win everything without the backing of money?
Please educate me, I'm all ears.
At Porto, yes, there he did.
Porto was a similar case to Chelsea. A very good team that just needed minor tweaking to get them to the top. He did very well though and I can see Mancini doing just as well with the same resources. Jose didn't win the CL with Chelsea, despite all the money, and was in serious decline when he left. He seemed to have lost the plot and was no use to man nor beast yet because he was a media darling he was hailed again as the second coming.
The British media love his antics, just like they do with 'Arry, and that's why they are lauding his comeback, they need to fill the back pages.
At Chelsea no one will manage to win the Chumps, while they are owned by that lunatic. To be fair to him, at Chelsea he won 5 trophies (if i recall right) and at Porto, well it was Porto and he won Uefa Cup and Champions League in two consecutive years. After he left from Porto, only Deco and Ricardo Carvalho stepped up as a high level. Derlei, Postiga, Nuno Valente, Paulo Fereira, Carlos Alberto, etc, they failed to deliver.
Yes, he is a media delight, if you ask me, a pale copy of Cloughie, but he is the best one out there.
And to the example where Chelsea and Inter, had poor moments after he left, i think it's because he used his players and squad 200% taking the best from them.
And of course, he knows how to put pressure on those bent fucks from FA, and altough i don't like this tactic, i am aware that you can only beat filth with their own weapons.