sidSmith wrote:I'm not sure the argument that he meant to pass back along the floor but miss kicked it holds as 'not intentional'. It's all in the eyes and that's the direction he was looking!!
I look at incidents these days and think what if it was us too. Aguero pen, no. Their freekick, bloody joke, back pass, definitely, and I'd have called zaba for it, although I do think hart knows the rules. He would have tried to head it leading to a goal and then we'd want that head on a pole ;-)
frozen_pea wrote:sidSmith wrote:I'm not sure the argument that he meant to pass back along the floor but miss kicked it holds as 'not intentional'. It's all in the eyes and that's the direction he was looking!!
I look at incidents these days and think what if it was us too. Aguero pen, no. Their freekick, bloody joke, back pass, definitely, and I'd have called zaba for it, although I do think hart knows the rules. He would have tried to head it leading to a goal and then we'd want that head on a pole ;-)
I'll be honest, before the weekend I didn't realise it was handle, I always thought it was catch / pick up.
The thought had never really been in my mind to differentiate, but when you think about it, it's the same thing, handling the ball!
I'd be upset if the back pass went against us, but would understand it. It's how well doe the ref know the rules.
Remember the (I think Villa v Birmingham) match where a (Villa?)player took a throw in, back to the keeper, went under his foot and in.
Now you can't score direct from a throw in, and there is no way the ref could have seen the ball scrape the keeps studs, but the goal stood.
Do the refs know all the rules, the interpretations and all the nuances? Would he / the linesman have been watching Garrido that closely?
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: BlueinBosnia, PeterParker and 241 guests