Cocacolajojo wrote:But that is a very warped way of communicating back and forth through different posts. I still don't understand who's talking to who. Fair play!
Lost me as well.
Cocacolajojo wrote:But that is a very warped way of communicating back and forth through different posts. I still don't understand who's talking to who. Fair play!
I Just Blue Myself wrote:Sorry, I assumed your post was a reply to Blue Since 76's FFP remark (or to Alex Sapphire's post, which itself was a reply to BS76), because of the Europe reference. Was it not?
There's only 1 city!! wrote:is it not doing anyone else's head in at the amount of money that qpr has spent over the last 18 month??
we got hammered for our spending (bought the league etc) but no-one has said out about them spending all that money to stay in the league, when teams around them haven't got a bean.
they spent 20m on remy & samba, both on close to 100 grand a week on top off who they've got their already
hope they go down
just wondering if your thought's are the same as mine????
cheers, rant over!!
Goataldo wrote:There's only 1 city!! wrote:is it not doing anyone else's head in at the amount of money that qpr has spent over the last 18 month??
we got hammered for our spending (bought the league etc) but no-one has said out about them spending all that money to stay in the league, when teams around them haven't got a bean.
they spent 20m on remy & samba, both on close to 100 grand a week on top off who they've got their already
hope they go down
just wondering if your thought's are the same as mine????
cheers, rant over!!
You hope they go down because the press don't like us? It sounds like your annoyed because they've spent loads, more than the lack of bad press it generated. Which is it? Either way, I don't think my thoughts are the same as yours. I like QPR, despite Twitchy Scrotum Face.
Sideshow Bob wrote:this thread is embarassing. akin to chelsea fans having a go at us about our spending.
london blue 2 wrote:Sideshow Bob wrote:this thread is embarassing. akin to chelsea fans having a go at us about our spending.
Embarrassing is a bit strong, I just think the OP is concerned that the media have double standards in regard to premier league spending. Which in my opinion is fair (although there is nothing new about that there).
I think the point about them going down is unwarranted especially as them staying in the prem bodes well for us with regard to premier league FFP votes.
london blue 2 wrote:Sideshow Bob wrote:this thread is embarassing. akin to chelsea fans having a go at us about our spending.
Embarrassing is a bit strong, I just think the OP is concerned that the media have double standards in regard to premier league spending. Which in my opinion is fair (although there is nothing new about that there).
I think the point about them going down is unwarranted especially as them staying in the prem bodes well for us with regard to premier league FFP votes.
john68 wrote:london blue 2 wrote:Sideshow Bob wrote:this thread is embarassing. akin to chelsea fans having a go at us about our spending.
Embarrassing is a bit strong, I just think the OP is concerned that the media have double standards in regard to premier league spending. Which in my opinion is fair (although there is nothing new about that there).
I think the point about them going down is unwarranted especially as them staying in the prem bodes well for us with regard to premier league FFP votes.
No worries, the none of the FFPR exists mate...Don't you read Mancio's posts?
Mancio4ever wrote:You just have to decide if You want me to stay off, contemplating Your amusement at Your own toy from outside the fances without interfering or if You want me to set on confrontational mood.
Either way, as always happens in history, in two years time You will realize what's FFPR worth. and will have to elect a new Cuddly Toy accordingly.
To opine, that an investment in excess billion GB Pounds, run by an absolute World Top Buiness Investor, can be dumped by a set of rules and that there are no means to bypass, go round them just for enough time to generate a turnover of gross incomes which can defy whatsoever scrutiny, is not only embarrassing, it just conflict to the whole History of Economics.
It would equate to say that, only a Blond, Smart. Tall and Rich Prince Charming can succeed in marry a Gorgeous Lady. Unreal.
Yet again, I do respect Your personal toys, amusements and much more importantly, I do love You.
Do not take internet banter too seriously and personally... someone told me that a couple of times :-)
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: AFKAE and 171 guests