mr_nool wrote:Mancio4ever wrote:
I do not suggest anything, mate.
The idea of myself being criminal seems to become pretty popular: it's at least the third time I must read such an opinion, rather implied or openly spoken... :-)
I just rest confident on the fact that no accountancy regulation have never succeeded in stopping an extremely well funded and shrewdly managed Investment.
I must certainly be as daft and criminal as anyone may enjoy to paint me out, but I still fail to see anything on these rules which might stop City to acquire the services of anyone shall be deemed useful to progress of the Club. Should it ever - actually - happen, I shall prompt myself for a complete set of apologies.
end of my criminal opinion.
You're putting words in my mouth, mate. Nowhere did I call you, or imply that you are, a criminal.
However, you did suggest that players could get paid through an offshore account, and that is something I doubt that the UK tax office would be very pleased with.
I know You are a fair friend to me, mate.
And I have already outed my naive inadequacy to cyber-life.
I am just puzzled on whether I'd consider more illegal the attempt of an Establishment desperate enough to hide their intention to stop any
fair competition behind the word
fair..... or the use of a very common counter-measure in the business world of all times, as a reaction thereof.
Anyway, I do not care to make a point on this oddity, as I am absolutely confident on that no harm shall never be caused to City through these means.
xxx
[I am not gay, mind]