An insult to Shrek.

Here is the place to talk about all things city and football!

Re: An insult to Shrek.

Postby Bridge'srightfoot » Wed Oct 16, 2013 6:18 pm

twosips wrote:He's a very good player but also a massive cunt...one of those 'you'd rather him on your side then up against you' types...but still a massive cunt nonetheless.

Think that just about sums it up for me.

And me too.
Bridge'srightfoot
Rosler's Grandad Bombed The Swamp
 
Posts: 3996
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2010 9:49 pm
Supporter of: City

Re: An insult to Shrek.

Postby MilnersJaw » Wed Oct 16, 2013 6:46 pm

Bridge'srightfoot wrote:So let's do some research. This season Rooney's scored 7 goals. 3 of them were free kicks. One was a one on one and the other was a volley from a cross. Included in the 7 is 2 for England, one was a good header last night and one was you could say a 'tap in' against Montenegro. Where he reacted quickly to score.
So 1 'tap in' in 7 goals. Just under 15%. A mere 75% under your estimate. Is this just an anomaly? So you don't know how to find his statistics yet you've made a claim that 90% of his goals are tap ins? You've made a ridiculous claim now back it up please? But here's something for you mate. The only way he'll end up this season with 90% of his goals being tap ins, is if he scores another 53 goals, all of which being tap ins. If he scores that many more however, I don't think anyone will mind that they weren't amazing goals.
It's an absolute bullshit statistic you made up. And average at best? Well how high are your standards?
And yes he does score a lot of simple goals. But so does any top striker. Quick reactions and positional play are hugely important for a striker. Better to score ten tap ins a season than 5 amazing goals.
But that's a moot point anyway because he scores plenty of good goals.

As I've said Im all for rivalry and calling him an ugly granny shagger etc but if you think he's an 'average at best footballer' and pull out 'stats' from thin air based on 'your Rag mate' You need your fucking head checked.


See I told you spunk far too much over him. I've not watches him at all this season bar when he played against city. So what if I'm wrong this season. How long has he been at the rags, quite a few seasons now, why don't you put me in my place at those, if you can get off your knees first.
User avatar
MilnersJaw
Kinky's Mazy Dribbles
 
Posts: 2229
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2012 4:59 pm
Supporter of: Manchester City
My favourite player is: Silver

Re: An insult to Shrek.

Postby london blue 2 » Wed Oct 16, 2013 6:47 pm

He has a huge gash on his head, we always knew he was cunt face

Good player mind. Rags best player IMO.
london blue 2
Paul Power's Tash
 
Posts: 10339
Joined: Fri May 19, 2006 10:32 am
Location: london
Supporter of: MCFC

Re: An insult to Shrek.

Postby Bridge'srightfoot » Wed Oct 16, 2013 7:01 pm

MilnersJaw wrote:
Bridge'srightfoot wrote:So let's do some research. This season Rooney's scored 7 goals. 3 of them were free kicks. One was a one on one and the other was a volley from a cross. Included in the 7 is 2 for England, one was a good header last night and one was you could say a 'tap in' against Montenegro. Where he reacted quickly to score.
So 1 'tap in' in 7 goals. Just under 15%. A mere 75% under your estimate. Is this just an anomaly? So you don't know how to find his statistics yet you've made a claim that 90% of his goals are tap ins? You've made a ridiculous claim now back it up please? But here's something for you mate. The only way he'll end up this season with 90% of his goals being tap ins, is if he scores another 53 goals, all of which being tap ins. If he scores that many more however, I don't think anyone will mind that they weren't amazing goals.
It's an absolute bullshit statistic you made up. And average at best? Well how high are your standards?
And yes he does score a lot of simple goals. But so does any top striker. Quick reactions and positional play are hugely important for a striker. Better to score ten tap ins a season than 5 amazing goals.
But that's a moot point anyway because he scores plenty of good goals.

As I've said Im all for rivalry and calling him an ugly granny shagger etc but if you think he's an 'average at best footballer' and pull out 'stats' from thin air based on 'your Rag mate' You need your fucking head checked.


See I told you spunk far too much over him. I've not watches him at all this season bar when he played against city. So what if I'm wrong this season. How long has he been at the rags, quite a few seasons now, why don't you put me in my place at those, if you can get off your knees first.

Oh how convenient. You've realised that you're wrong and now you turn to 'stop sucking him off' argument. Rather than the actual debate which was taking place. Typical.
So you've said you don't know how to find Rooney 'tap in' statistics yet claim 90% of his goals are tap ins. Then you go onto say you've not watched him play and haven't seen his goals yet you're making a judgement on the goals you haven't seen? The one goal you have seen was a 30 yard free kick. Some fucking tap in that was. Pathetic. I've then proved you wrong by showing only 1 in 7 of his goals this season could be considered a tap in? Is this just a freak season?
So before this season he'd scored about 215 goals or so, by you're reckoning about 190-195 of these goals have been tap ins? Open nets, keeper spills? So he's only scored about 22 odd goals which weren't tap ins?
Don't change the argument because you realise you've been proven wrong. Just admit you came up with a bullshit statistic plucked out of thin air.
Bridge'srightfoot
Rosler's Grandad Bombed The Swamp
 
Posts: 3996
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2010 9:49 pm
Supporter of: City

Re: An insult to Shrek.

Postby Blue Oli » Wed Oct 16, 2013 7:04 pm

I'm sorry I seam to have stumbled onto some pissy rag forum by mistake here
Blue Oli
Robinho's Step Over
 
Posts: 282
Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2012 10:01 pm
Supporter of: Manchester City
My favourite player is: Paul Power

Re: An insult to Shrek.

Postby MilnersJaw » Wed Oct 16, 2013 7:07 pm

Bridge'srightfoot wrote:Oh how convenient. You've realised that you're wrong and now you turn to 'stop sucking him off' argument. Rather than the actual debate which was taking place. Typical.
So you've said you don't know how to find Rooney 'tap in' statistics yet claim 90% of his goals are tap ins. Then you go onto say you've not watched him play and haven't seen his goals yet you're making a judgement on the goals you haven't seen? The one goal you have seen was a 30 yard free kick. Some fucking tap in that was. Pathetic. I've then proved you wrong by showing only 1 in 7 of his goals this season could be considered a tap in? Is this just a freak season?
So before this season he'd scored about 215 goals or so, by you're reckoning about 190-195 of these goals have been tap ins? Open nets, keeper spills? So he's only scored about 22 odd goals which weren't tap ins?
Don't change the argument because you realise you've been proven wrong. Just admit you came up with a bullshit statistic plucked out of thin air.


You're a moron who can't read as you are too busy wanking off Rooney. I said I've not seen him play this season, does that mean I've never seen him play previously? No argument is being changed keep at it though.
User avatar
MilnersJaw
Kinky's Mazy Dribbles
 
Posts: 2229
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2012 4:59 pm
Supporter of: Manchester City
My favourite player is: Silver

Re: An insult to Shrek.

Postby Bridge'srightfoot » Wed Oct 16, 2013 7:10 pm

MilnersJaw wrote:
Bridge'srightfoot wrote:Oh how convenient. You've realised that you're wrong and now you turn to 'stop sucking him off' argument. Rather than the actual debate which was taking place. Typical.
So you've said you don't know how to find Rooney 'tap in' statistics yet claim 90% of his goals are tap ins. Then you go onto say you've not watched him play and haven't seen his goals yet you're making a judgement on the goals you haven't seen? The one goal you have seen was a 30 yard free kick. Some fucking tap in that was. Pathetic. I've then proved you wrong by showing only 1 in 7 of his goals this season could be considered a tap in? Is this just a freak season?
So before this season he'd scored about 215 goals or so, by you're reckoning about 190-195 of these goals have been tap ins? Open nets, keeper spills? So he's only scored about 22 odd goals which weren't tap ins?
Don't change the argument because you realise you've been proven wrong. Just admit you came up with a bullshit statistic plucked out of thin air.


You're a moron who can't read as you are too busy wanking off Rooney. I said I've not seen him play this season, does that mean I've never seen him play previously? No argument is being changed keep at it though.



There you go again changing the subject.
Now let's look at last season. He scored 12 league goals in total, His last 5 being a 30 yarder vs Norwich, a good finish against Fulham, then a shot from just inside the area after going past a defender, a one on one against Southampton, a tap in in the same game.
I could find the others but that i've already proved my point. Neither of his goals last season against us were 'tap ins' either. So last season aswell 90% of his goals weren't tap ins. So that's two seasons in a row, was that also just a freak season? Two freak seasons in a row? Wow. Shall we go back 3 seasons and see if 90% of those were tap ins? Has he only scored about 22 career goals which weren't tap ins? So you're honestly telling me 90% of his goals have been tap ins? Prove it. Oh wait you can't because you made it up.
So just because you've not seen him play does it not count? You can't say 'I've not seen him play this season' and use that in a justification in your argument.
Stop digging.
Bridge'srightfoot
Rosler's Grandad Bombed The Swamp
 
Posts: 3996
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2010 9:49 pm
Supporter of: City

Re: An insult to Shrek.

Postby Bridge'srightfoot » Thu Oct 17, 2013 10:53 am

MilnersJaw wrote:
Bridge'srightfoot wrote:Oh how convenient. You've realised that you're wrong and now you turn to 'stop sucking him off' argument. Rather than the actual debate which was taking place. Typical.
So you've said you don't know how to find Rooney 'tap in' statistics yet claim 90% of his goals are tap ins. Then you go onto say you've not watched him play and haven't seen his goals yet you're making a judgement on the goals you haven't seen? The one goal you have seen was a 30 yard free kick. Some fucking tap in that was. Pathetic. I've then proved you wrong by showing only 1 in 7 of his goals this season could be considered a tap in? Is this just a freak season?
So before this season he'd scored about 215 goals or so, by you're reckoning about 190-195 of these goals have been tap ins? Open nets, keeper spills? So he's only scored about 22 odd goals which weren't tap ins?
Don't change the argument because you realise you've been proven wrong. Just admit you came up with a bullshit statistic plucked out of thin air.


You're a moron who can't read as you are too busy wanking off Rooney. I said I've not seen him play this season, does that mean I've never seen him play previously? No argument is being changed keep at it though.

I'm still waiting for your proof mate. You made up a ridiculous stat and when asked to prove it you said you couldn't because you didn't know how to find out the stats. So despite the fact you had no idea, you just pulled a figure out of thin air.
Because at the moment your argument that 90% of his goals are tap ins are 'whenever I see him play he scores simple goals and even my Rag mates agree'. Yet you then said you've not seen him play this season except the derby where he scored a free kick. How convenient. And 6 of his 7 goals this season have not been tap ins so as I said he'll have to score another 53 goals this season, all of them being tap ins for that 90% figure to be correct. So I asked is this season a freak season? To which you replied 'I haven't seen him play'
So then I looked at last season and showed that your claim that 90% of his goals come from tap ins also wasn't true.
Then realising you'd lost the argument you reverted to 'stop wanking off Rooney' because you knew you couldn't defend your original, ridiculous claim and tried to change subject. Just have the decency to admit you were wrong rather than digging.



A tap in is a goal which you really can't miss, normally from between the goal line to about 3/4 yards out and usually an open net.
Have 90% of his career goals been of that nature? Has he only scored about 20 goals which weren't tap ins?
Answer these questions please.
Bridge'srightfoot
Rosler's Grandad Bombed The Swamp
 
Posts: 3996
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2010 9:49 pm
Supporter of: City

Re: An insult to Shrek.

Postby bigblue » Sat Oct 19, 2013 7:19 am

Bridge'srightfoot wrote:I'm still waiting for your proof mate. You made up a ridiculous stat and when asked to prove it you said you couldn't because you didn't know how to find out the stats. So despite the fact you had no idea, you just pulled a figure out of thin air.
Because at the moment your argument that 90% of his goals are tap ins are 'whenever I see him play he scores simple goals and even my Rag mates agree'. Yet you then said you've not seen him play this season except the derby where he scored a free kick. How convenient. And 6 of his 7 goals this season have not been tap ins so as I said he'll have to score another 53 goals this season, all of them being tap ins for that 90% figure to be correct. So I asked is this season a freak season? To which you replied 'I haven't seen him play'
So then I looked at last season and showed that your claim that 90% of his goals come from tap ins also wasn't true.
Then realising you'd lost the argument you reverted to 'stop wanking off Rooney' because you knew you couldn't defend your original, ridiculous claim and tried to change subject. Just have the decency to admit you were wrong rather than digging.

A tap in is a goal which you really can't miss, normally from between the goal line to about 3/4 yards out and usually an open net.
Have 90% of his career goals been of that nature? Has he only scored about 20 goals which weren't tap ins?
Answer these questions please.


All you've proven is that you're an even bigger cunt than previously thought.
User avatar
bigblue
Paul Power's Tash
 
Posts: 10993
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 7:11 pm
Supporter of: Manchester's Only
My favourite player is: Yaya

Re: An insult to Shrek.

Postby Cocacolajojo1 » Sat Oct 19, 2013 4:03 pm

bigblue wrote:
All you've proven is that you're an even bigger cunt than previously thought.


And that is on mean feat in this thread!

Welcome back by the way. Haven't seen you post in a while.
User avatar
Cocacolajojo1
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Dickov's Injury Time Equaliser
 
Posts: 4526
Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2007 2:42 pm
Location: Umeå
Supporter of: MCFC
My favourite player is: Ireland 08-09

Re: An insult to Shrek.

Postby Beefymcfc » Sat Oct 19, 2013 7:13 pm

Never really understood the thread to be fair, who in their right mind would want to support Wiggy?
In the words of my Old Man, "Life will never be the same without Man City, so get it in while you can".

The Future's Bright, The Future's Blue!!!
User avatar
Beefymcfc
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 46711
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 7:14 am
Supporter of: The Mighty Blues

Re: An insult to Shrek.

Postby MilnersJaw » Sat Oct 19, 2013 7:33 pm

Beefymcfc wrote:Never really understood the thread to be fair, who in their right mind would want to support Wiggy?


wayne rooneys rightfoot would.
Still here.
User avatar
MilnersJaw
Kinky's Mazy Dribbles
 
Posts: 2229
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2012 4:59 pm
Supporter of: Manchester City
My favourite player is: Silver

Re: An insult to Shrek.

Postby Breks » Sat Oct 19, 2013 7:44 pm

Beefymcfc wrote:Never really understood the thread to be fair, who in their right mind would want to support Wiggy?


Point of the thread is that rooney is an incoherent babbling fuckwit who is uglier than shrek.
Breks
De Jong's Tackle
 
Posts: 1162
Joined: Tue Aug 06, 2013 4:03 pm
Supporter of: Manchester City
My favourite player is: Pablo Zabaleta

Re: An insult to Shrek.

Postby Bridge'srightfoot » Sat Oct 19, 2013 9:18 pm

MilnersJaw wrote:
Beefymcfc wrote:Never really understood the thread to be fair, who in their right mind would want to support Wiggy?


wayne rooneys rightfoot would.

I wasn't supporting him. Or making a judgement on his ability. I was discussing your claim that 90 percent of his goals were tap ins. Which just isn't true.
Bridge'srightfoot
Rosler's Grandad Bombed The Swamp
 
Posts: 3996
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2010 9:49 pm
Supporter of: City

Previous

Return to The Maine Football forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 137 guests