Uniteds first 11 cost more than City's

Here is the place to talk about all things city and football!

Re: Uniteds first 11 cost more than City's

Postby simplytolmie » Wed Mar 26, 2014 7:22 pm

It was little reported the other week that the Scum fielded the costliest team ever in the Premier League. Funny that the tabloids didn't report it properly.

If it was us it'd be everywhere with a chart of how much the Sheik has invested etc
simplytolmie
Micah Richard's Penalty Dives
 
Posts: 113
Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2012 8:00 pm
Supporter of: Manchester City FC
My favourite player is: Aguero

Re: Uniteds first 11 cost more than City's

Postby Bianchi on Ice » Wed Mar 26, 2014 7:24 pm

so they ARE buying success then. or should I say, buying seventh. Fair play to them I say
Bianchi on Ice
Rosler's Grandad Bombed The Swamp
 
Posts: 3973
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 3:28 pm
Supporter of: City
My favourite player is: warren beatty

Re: Uniteds first 11 cost more than City's

Postby AG7 » Thu Mar 27, 2014 10:32 am

MEN (Stuart Brennan) has gone and said it out loud now ... and is this the best piece he has ever written or what?

http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/ ... er-6884095
--

Comment: Shrewd City's eye for value showing United up

When you look at the two line-ups in Tueday’s one-sided derby, it is clear the Reds have been spending their way to mediocrity – their starting XI at Old Trafford cost £181m, and a superior City team cost £168m.

VALUE: David Silva cose less than Marouane Fellaini

Well, at least United fans can console themselves that they haven’t bought their way to success, eh?

Indeed, when you look at the two line-ups in Tueday’s one-sided derby, it is clear the Reds have been spending their way to mediocrity – their starting XI at Old Trafford cost £181m, and a superior City team cost £168m.

There are some staggering statistics which suggest that when it comes to Sir Alex Ferguson’s old mantra of ‘value for money’, City have been streets ahead of United in recent years.

Rio Ferdinand cost almost half as much again as the entire Blues defence, including Joe Hart. Marouane Fellaini cost more than Yaya Toure, David Silva and Samir Nasri, who weaved such elegant patterns around the floundering Belgian.

Juan Mata’s £37m fee overshadows the £30m City shelled out for the outstanding Fernandinho – a fee which some dismissed as over-priced at the time. No longer – the Brazilian has been a huge factor in taking City to the next level.

The Blues have been accused of ruining football, yet the evidence against United is there for all to see.

Spending record amounts on players is what inflates the transfer market, and United’s team on Tuesday included players who represent English record fees for a goalkeeper, defender and teenager. Even more daunting for the Reds is the amount of investment in players they need to achieve parity with a City team which will strengthen again this summer.

Recently we asked you to value the City squad and compared it to what was actually paid - see the results in the gallery below and click on the other link to see the United results

They might also consider that the Sheikh’s broad-based investment means City’s superiority goes much deeper than the first team.

The Blues are also better at every level below the first team – and that is acknowledged by Reds coach Phil Neville and their striker Robin van Persie, whose own sons are in the Blues academy.

Of course, youth development is an uncertain area, but there are far more prospects in the City set-up – both English and foreign – than there are at Carrington.

The money ploughed into developing the academy and its facilities, which will blossom into the crowning achievement of the Etihad Campus next year, is likely to be Sheikh Mansour’s greatest legacy to City, to Manchester and to English football.

Anyone who thinks that is over-blowing the facts should know that the Blues’ academy is largely stocked by local boys.

The flippant accusation levelled at City since Sheikh Mansour’s take-over is that their rise is somehow artificial, buoyed up by unearned money, and that it is all a little tasteless.

It is utter bunkum, of course. The investment from Abu Dhabi has been a good one – the motive was to boost the name of the emirate, and its state airline Etihad, and the association with City has done just that.

Etihad’s profits have surged since 2008, and the association with this classy City team enhances the airline’s reputation, while Abu Dhabi is now on the map as a tourist destination – something in which City have also played a big part. It is laughable United fans criticise a major investment by City’s owners which has been hugely beneficial to both parties, while the Reds’ owners have plunged their club into debt.

It is even dafter that Uefa thinks Sheikh Mansour’s investment, a huge boost to football and the community in Manchester, needs investigating under the Fair Play system, while the plunder of United is not.

Of course it is dangerous to dismiss United – they remain a great club with a big global standing. But it is City who are setting the pace in Manchester now, and the Reds are limping along in their wake.
User avatar
AG7
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Kinky's Mazy Dribbles
 
Posts: 2551
Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2012 9:48 pm
Location: Milton Keynes
Supporter of: Manchester City
My favourite player is: Agueroooooo!

Re: Uniteds first 11 cost more than City's

Postby AG7 » Thu Mar 27, 2014 10:54 am

What's going on here ...
Now even SKY is showing this ...

MCFCvMUFC-SKY.jpg
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
AG7
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Kinky's Mazy Dribbles
 
Posts: 2551
Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2012 9:48 pm
Location: Milton Keynes
Supporter of: Manchester City
My favourite player is: Agueroooooo!

Re: Uniteds first 11 cost more than City's

Postby There's only 1 city!! » Thu Mar 27, 2014 12:23 pm

i posted the list of players on me facebook status, the responce from the rags was "you've spent ex amount in 5 yrs"

I reminded them that baconface spent 26 million before winning his 1st trophy in 1990

There all just gutted that the power has shifted in are direction and their finished!!

COME ON CITY!!
There's only 1 city!!
Micah Richard's Penalty Dives
 
Posts: 148
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2009 12:11 pm

Re: Uniteds first 11 cost more than City's

Postby Dameerto » Thu Mar 27, 2014 1:03 pm

I didn't think life could get much better than the latest derby day, but it just has.
VIVA EL CITIES

"The adjudicatory chamber of the Ethics Committee ... has banned Mr Joseph S. Blatter ... for eight years and Mr Michel Platini ... for eight years from all football-related activities (administrative, sports or any other) on a national and international level. The bans come into force immediately." - 21/12/2015
User avatar
Dameerto
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Allison's Big Fat Cigar
 
Posts: 18703
Joined: Mon Jun 22, 2009 7:08 pm
Supporter of: El City
My favourite player is: Sergio Forwardo

Re: Uniteds first 11 cost more than City's

Postby Bianchi on Ice » Thu Mar 27, 2014 2:18 pm

There's only 1 city!! wrote:i posted the list of players on me facebook status, the responce from the rags was "you've spent ex amount in 5 yrs"

I reminded them that baconface spent 26 million before winning his 1st trophy in 1990

There all just gutted that the power has shifted in are direction and their finished!!

COME ON CITY!!


Its time for the Jack nicholson "you cant handle the truth" moment
Bianchi on Ice
Rosler's Grandad Bombed The Swamp
 
Posts: 3973
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 3:28 pm
Supporter of: City
My favourite player is: warren beatty

Re: Uniteds first 11 cost more than City's

Postby nottsblue » Thu Mar 27, 2014 9:06 pm

Also how much will they have to spend in years to come just to catch up?
Last edited by nottsblue on Thu Mar 27, 2014 9:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
nottsblue
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 32463
Joined: Sat Oct 05, 2013 5:17 pm
Location: Nottingham
Supporter of: manchester city
My favourite player is: niall Quinn & Kun

Re: Uniteds first 11 cost more than City's

Postby nottsblue » Thu Mar 27, 2014 9:07 pm

The old adage "you get what you pay for" could not be more wrong when looking at rags
nottsblue
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 32463
Joined: Sat Oct 05, 2013 5:17 pm
Location: Nottingham
Supporter of: manchester city
My favourite player is: niall Quinn & Kun

Previous

Return to The Maine Football forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: BlueinBosnia, C & C, Google [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot], Mase, Pretty Boy Lee and 144 guests