Mase wrote:Im_Spartacus wrote:Peter Doherty (AGAIG) wrote:walmai wrote:Peter Doherty (AGAIG) wrote:Just wondering how many offside goals we'll concede.
Something of a mixed day down at Selhurst at the weekend.
Gave a very dubious pen, but then sent off Gayle, who very much deserved his first yellow, but probably wound up one too many people for his second.
The funny thing was that the Palace lot all boo-ed him when his name was first announced. Almost as if they knew he'd eventually make a call that they didn't like.
Pardew did however make a proper fool of himself moaning about it. Seemed to me like he'd wound up his young striker to get in among the sledging, only for it to all go a bit Pete before half-time.
My main worry with him is that he seems to be the go-to ref when the league needs to stop us running away with the title, or like two years ago, when he almost helped the dippers win the title by ensuring (in two games at the end of the season) that Suarez stayed on the pitch when he should have had a red. And let's not forget, he's the guy that 'amended' his match report ensuring Adebayor could be charged after the Arsenal game when he ran the length of the pitch. Then there's the Chelsea away game 4 seasons ago, the spurs game this season, the rags away last season, etc.
And the game we won 6-1 with Evans sent off?
Was that just an accident?
He's just given you a handful of incidents and you've mentioned one where we totally outclassed and dominated a team whilst he was refereeing. Was it mentioned that after that match he wasn't allowed to referee a rag match for quite some time. Do you think that will play on his mind during the match tomorrow?
I mentioned his subsequent 'ban' after the 1-6 and what he did in his first game back earlier in the thread.
We could all line up dozens of incidents from every ref, for and against every club. I think he's one of the better refs, though was 100% certainly 'punished' for reffing the 1-6, and he 100% made 'amends' when he was allowed to.
I still maintain that refs aren't fundamentally bent or instructed in a certain way, but that they gain an unspoken understanding of what is required for their career to progress, and in that way they and their bosses (despite having a mutual understanding on what is required) can never be accused of corruption
To me all that shows is that every ref knows what side their bread is buttered on, and it's obvious that the refs who don't toe the line get fucked over by pgmol. That applies as much to Clattenburg as any other ref.
Ultimately, what ref is gonna risk his whole career going against the establishment. The ones that do, will have no career