Dameerto wrote:The whole closed shop setup for officials is what leads to situations like this - there's no accountability and if a manager questions an official's integrity they get in trouble for it.
dave watson's perm wrote:Dameerto wrote:The whole closed shop setup for officials is what leads to situations like this - there's no accountability and if a manager questions an official's integrity they get in trouble for it.
Unless they are called Whiskey Nose in which case the said official is not allowed to ref scum games for the foreseeable future
Dameerto wrote:The whole closed shop setup for officials is what leads to situations like this - there's no accountability and if a manager questions an official's integrity they get in trouble for it.
Original Dub wrote:No accountability. No technology to assist. No clarity on the laws of the game.
All of the above can be sorted in an instant.
You need to ask yourself why it isn't.
And if we're all paranoid/spoilt, why is each one of us calling for a LEVEL PLAYING FIELD.
To have to ask for fairness is so ridiculous. To not be able to spot the unfairness is fucking spaztastic.
Original Dub wrote:No accountability. No technology to assist. No clarity on the laws of the game.
All of the above can be sorted in an instant.
You need to ask yourself why it isn't.
And if we're all paranoid/spoilt, why is each one of us calling for a LEVEL PLAYING FIELD.
To have to ask for fairness is so ridiculous. To not be able to spot the unfairness is fucking spaztastic.
Original Dub wrote:No accountability. No technology to assist. No clarity on the laws of the game.
All of the above can be sorted in an instant.
You need to ask yourself why it isn't.
And if we're all paranoid/spoilt, why is each one of us calling for a LEVEL PLAYING FIELD.
To have to ask for fairness is so ridiculous. To not be able to spot the unfairness is fucking spaztastic.
Mase wrote:Graham Poll:
"Watching live as Danny Rose's cross hit Raheem Sterling, it just looked wrong.
And replays proved that the ball simply struck Sterling on the back.
The only conclusion can be that Clattenburg guessed it had hit Sterling on the arm.
Any argument of whether it was inside the box was irrelevant.
It just wasn't handball and Clattenburg was wrong.
Even if the ball had hit Sterling's arm, it shouldn't have been a penalty because he had turned his head and wasn't looking at the ball, therefore it can't have been deliberate.
Tottenham might win the League as a result of the referee's mistake."
Tokyo Blue wrote:Original Dub wrote:No accountability. No technology to assist. No clarity on the laws of the game.
All of the above can be sorted in an instant.
You need to ask yourself why it isn't.
And if we're all paranoid/spoilt, why is each one of us calling for a LEVEL PLAYING FIELD.
To have to ask for fairness is so ridiculous. To not be able to spot the unfairness is fucking spaztastic.
That's it, isn't it. None of us wants any favours; we just want correct decisions to be made at all times.
BTW, the Johnson dive/pen was v Fulham, I believe, OD, in the snow, rather than Sunderland.
CTID Hants wrote:Well it would appear that The Count won't be charged by the FA after his post match...........
Well according to Daily star that is.... http://www.dailystar.co.uk/sport/footba ... lattenburg
Let's see what happens him now, demoted to lesser leagues for a couple of weeks at minimum i reckon.
zuricity wrote:CTID Hants wrote:Well it would appear that The Count won't be charged by the FA after his post match...........
Well according to Daily star that is.... http://www.dailystar.co.uk/sport/footba ... lattenburg
Let's see what happens him now, demoted to lesser leagues for a couple of weeks at minimum i reckon.
And that report in the Daily Star is exactly what is wrong with online media today. They would rather fill a webpage and transmit thousands and thousands of Bytes of absolute gash about WAGS and all other BS alongside one Sentence that Pellegrini said. Judging by that one innocuous sentence, it is no wonder they will not be charging him , for what ?
Not much of a verbal blast was it ?
South Stand Balti wrote:I don't think Clattenberg is incompetent., I don't think he guessed and I don't think he blew too early. He simply knew exactly what he was doing. I put on this site a couple of weeks ago that I wouldn't go to Wembley if he got the gig. I haven't forgotten Anfield and I'm not just referring to Skertl.
Original Dub wrote:South Stand Balti wrote:I don't think Clattenberg is incompetent., I don't think he guessed and I don't think he blew too early. He simply knew exactly what he was doing. I put on this site a couple of weeks ago that I wouldn't go to Wembley if he got the gig. I haven't forgotten Anfield and I'm not just referring to Skertl.
I said it on here a couple of years ago. I know people who know him well. People who come from the same area as him. He is known as being a flash cunt who loves money and loves flaunting it.
An arrogant cunt on a power buzz.
He has always had all the traits of a bad egg and in no way should ever be considered for any job that requires a solid moral compass.
He's been relatively quiet for a while now, but as i said to my mate earlier this evening, he doesn't need to be corrupt all year round to make a few bob.
Peter Doherty (AGAIG) wrote:john@staustell wrote:Does anyone remember the 3-3 draw at Bolton under Hughes? All 3 Bolton goals were at some point the result of officials' action or inaction. Bellamy was hacked down in the penalty area and booked for diving, a second offence for which he was sent off. It was also this match when the ref said to one of our coaches how much he hated Bellamy before the incident. But of course nothing comes of it.
My belief is that ref was Clattenberg.
It was.
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: Hazy2, salford city and 144 guests