Bluedj wrote:Manuel was slagged off for woeful defending, but this is another f@@king level
I'd say it's exactly the same level. Two manager's with different tactics but this shit remains. Something is wrong.
Bluedj wrote:Manuel was slagged off for woeful defending, but this is another f@@king level
Beefymcfc wrote:ENIAM NAM wrote:Beefymcfc wrote:ENIAM NAM wrote:Idiot
Me, or him?
Both.
Talk of Pep out is ridiculous.
That said, he needs to work with those he has got and they are not good enough for his style.
Really? I wonder if he's actually lost the respect of the players trying to play such tactics. Doing it actually puts them under immense pressure to achieve and doesn't allow for a single mistake.
However, as I'm classed as the idiot, please tell me if you had the same support for Hughes, Mancini or Pellers when.they hit similar form?
Cocacolajojo wrote:Bluedj wrote:Manuel was slagged off for woeful defending, but this is another f@@king level
I'd say it's exactly the same level. Two manager's with different tactics but this shit remains. Something is wrong.
Cocacolajojo wrote:Bluedj wrote:Manuel was slagged off for woeful defending, but this is another f@@king level
I'd say it's exactly the same level. Two manager's with different tactics but this shit remains. Something is wrong.
Beefymcfc wrote:Cocacolajojo wrote:Bluedj wrote:Manuel was slagged off for woeful defending, but this is another f@@king level
I'd say it's exactly the same level. Two manager's with different tactics but this shit remains. Something is wrong.
The difference is that they're another year older. I'm a firm believer that Pep has chosen the attacking area over others, and also that Otamendi is a Pep buy, not Pellers.
The FB position is the issue, where we allowed it to delapidate. Pep decided that he could take it at risk, utilising the 3 at the back and WB system.
It doesn't work.
Moonchesteri wrote:Beefymcfc wrote:Cocacolajojo wrote:Bluedj wrote:Manuel was slagged off for woeful defending, but this is another f@@king level
I'd say it's exactly the same level. Two manager's with different tactics but this shit remains. Something is wrong.
The difference is that they're another year older. I'm a firm believer that Pep has chosen the attacking area over others, and also that Otamendi is a Pep buy, not Pellers.
The FB position is the issue, where we allowed it to delapidate. Pep decided that he could take it at risk, utilising the 3 at the back and WB system.
It doesn't work.
Pep likes his defenders to stay on their feet which is why I don't think that is the casex
Cocacolajojo wrote:Would it be typical City if we fired the most successful manager of the last decade? Not rhetorical.
london blue 2 wrote:Can we please have Bobby back.
Cocacolajojo wrote:If it were anyone else managing us, I'd say the manager has three games tops to fix this. Because it's Pep and because Tricky and Soriano has built their regime around the aim of getting Pep, he probably has longer. If Pep goes, however, they go, IMO.
london blue 2 wrote:Can we please have Bobby back.
South Stand Balti wrote:Cocacolajojo wrote:If it were anyone else managing us, I'd say the manager has three games tops to fix this. Because it's Pep and because Tricky and Soriano has built their regime around the aim of getting Pep, he probably has longer. If Pep goes, however, they go, IMO.
The Spafia need to go before January. They have been a fucking disaster. I'm not sure Pep will make it here. It's fucking awful to watch aside from the results. The suicide system he employs cannot be justified
Beefymcfc wrote:Cocacolajojo wrote:Would it be typical City if we fired the most successful manager of the last decade? Not rhetorical.
Typical!
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: Bluemoon4610, Google [Bot], johnny crossan, Majestic-12 [Bot], ruralblue, Stan, zuricity and 135 guests