Why Does Pep Unravel At This Point Every Season.

[PeterParker]

Sorry, just don't see the point of this thread at this point, we're still in the two biggest competitions, the ones that really matter. I'll be honest, I didn't give a fuck about the FA cup this season for various reasons, don't get me wrong I'm not knocking or dismissing it, just seeing the bigger pic, we need to win the champions League to take us to next level no matter how we feel about this competition. If he fails, then by all means feel free to cricise him, I've criticised him numerous times but won't do it for sake of doing it.

I think it's more of a debate, as no one in his right mind will want him out. Ever.
I do not mind it, to be honest, it's all about opinions and something that can make people talk more here on the forum.

[Bluemoon4610]

Sorry, just don't see the point of this thread at this point, we're still in the two biggest competitions, the ones that really matter. I'll be honest, I didn't give a fuck about the FA cup this season for various reasons, don't get me wrong I'm not knocking or dismissing it, just seeing the bigger pic, we need to win the champions League to take us to next level no matter how we feel about this competition. If he fails, then by all means feel free to cricise him, I've criticised him numerous times but won't do it for sake of doing it.

Outcast, what are you doing posting common sense? It's obvious the Pep UNRAVELS at this point EVERY SEASON. It's the reason we've never won anything under him. And why we've never set any records for points won, goals scored, consecutive wins etc. The man's a fraud!!!
+1 on the pointless thread notion.

[stupot]

+100 I'd say.
And PP you're right- no-one in their right minds would want him out which is why some on here would

[Original Dub]

He wants people to say, “that was because of Pep’s genius. Everyone thought he was mad to do it, but City wouldn’t have won if it wasn’t because of that tactical change by Pep!”

He doesn’t want to just win easy.

Is there something that really annoyed me, beyond the brainfarts, is that he failed to crush the rags when he had so many chances to do that.
I am still gutted we didn't win the league, on our turf, in 2018.

Rewatch the match. Not Pep’s fault we lost that match.

How anyone would come to the conclusion that it was pep's fault we lost that match is beyond me.

He's an amazing manager and has, on occasion, made mistakes that cost us the game.

But he does it less than any manager on the planet.

Best win percentage ever in the Premier league.
2nd best win percentage ever in the champions league (after zidane)

Anyone who thinks he's only a league manager is a mongo.

[PeterParker]

+100 I'd say.
And PP you're right- no-one in their right minds would want him out which is why some on here would

I don't think anyone here would want him, like really want him out. I am angry with him 90% of the time, but wouldn't want him out, never ever.

But, let's stop with "pointless thread" thing. We are quite missing some interaction here, and I think this thread or others that spark a debate, a decent one, not ones that are piss-poor, are welcomed.
I was looking at the one after the incident in the weekend and a few old school posters, which are missed, came back. That's good for our community.

[Harry Dowd scored]

+100 I'd say.
And PP you're right- no-one in their right minds would want him out which is why some on here would

I don't think anyone here would want him, like really want him out. I am angry with him 90% of the time, but wouldn't want him out, never ever.

But, let's stop with "pointless thread" thing. We are quite missing some interaction here, and I think this thread or others that spark a debate, a decent one, not ones that are piss-poor, are welcomed.
I was looking at the one after the incident in the weekend and a few old school posters, which are missed, came back. That's good for our community.

If its pointless why post on it?
I think what is pointless is having a forum where debate is stifled unless the debate follows a narrative that is acceptable to a certain percentage of posters.
It is very unhealthy to stifle/prevent posters from having a opinion that doesn't follow a certain line. Pep fucked up in the semi selecting a goalkeeper who had gifted Chelsea the previous semi, had a nightmare against Saints and is clearly not up to elite standard, these are unequivocally the facts of the matter. To disagree is one thing, to disparage/prevent people from voicing it is quite another.

[stupot]

They're not unequivocally the facts though.
Half the people on here were calling Ederson the week before saying he never makes a save. Crazy .
Pep has prioritised the other 2 cups which even to loads of people I was talking to at Wembley was the right call after the physical battering we took in Madrid.

[Hazy2]

We need more chat. I wonder are we in for Pogba?

[Harry Dowd scored]

We need more chat. I wonder are we in for Pogba?

No

[Hazy2]

We need more chat. I wonder are we in for Pogba?

No

Freebie and Pep loves him…,,

[PeterParker]

Are we now besties with Raiola?

[City64]

We need more chat. I wonder are we in for Pogba?

No

Freebie and Pep loves him…,,

Pogba is fucking shite don’t even mention that useless mercenary in any MCFC speak , thanks .

[Dimples]

We need more chat. I wonder are we in for Pogba?

No

Freebie and Pep loves him…,,

Pogba is fucking shite don’t even mention that useless mercenary in any MCFC speak , thanks .

Pogba, pure poison, a brain dead arsehole who thinks he is special. Manchild idiot.

[carl_feedthegoat]

+100 I'd say.
And PP you're right- no-one in their right minds would want him out which is why some on here would

I don't think anyone here would want him, like really want him out. I am angry with him 90% of the time, but wouldn't want him out, never ever.

But, let's stop with "pointless thread" thing. We are quite missing some interaction here, and I think this thread or others that spark a debate, a decent one, not ones that are piss-poor, are welcomed.
I was looking at the one after the incident in the weekend and a few old school posters, which are missed, came back. That's good for our community.

If its pointless why post on it?
I think what is pointless is having a forum where debate is stifled unless the debate follows a narrative that is acceptable to a certain percentage of posters.
It is very unhealthy to stifle/prevent posters from having a opinion that doesn't follow a certain line. Pep fucked up in the semi selecting a goalkeeper who had gifted Chelsea the previous semi, had a nightmare against Saints and is clearly not up to elite standard, these are unequivocally the facts of the matter. To disagree is one thing, to disparage/prevent people from voicing it is quite another.

Don’t waste your breath HD

[carl_feedthegoat]

+100 I'd say.
And PP you're right- no-one in their right minds would want him out which is why some on here would

.

Name one poster who said he wants him out ?

[Outcast]

+100 I'd say.
And PP you're right- no-one in their right minds would want him out which is why some on here would

I don't think anyone here would want him, like really want him out. I am angry with him 90% of the time, but wouldn't want him out, never ever.

But, let's stop with "pointless thread" thing. We are quite missing some interaction here, and I think this thread or others that spark a debate, a decent one, not ones that are piss-poor, are welcomed.
I was looking at the one after the incident in the weekend and a few old school posters, which are missed, came back. That's good for our community.

If its pointless why post on it?
I think what is pointless is having a forum where debate is stifled unless the debate follows a narrative that is acceptable to a certain percentage of posters.
It is very unhealthy to stifle/prevent posters from having a opinion that doesn't follow a certain line. Pep fucked up in the semi selecting a goalkeeper who had gifted Chelsea the previous semi, had a nightmare against Saints and is clearly not up to elite standard, these are unequivocally the facts of the matter. To disagree is one thing, to disparage/prevent people from voicing it is quite another.

I said there is no point of this thread at this stage as we're still in two competitions, if he fails to deliver then this thread becomes more relevant and questions can be asked. Do you think he should have risked his best players after a gruelling week and sacrifice PL and champions League for FA cup? Walker injured, KDB not fit, Dias not fit. Not long ago some posters calling for Ed to be dropped, Stiffy pulls clangers and everyone crying out Ed should have started. I always call out Pep for his brainfarts, just don't think this was one of them. I can't blame him for Stiffys clangers. Had he played his best players whist not fully fit, you'll have posters raging why he sacrificed PL for FA cup. It's like all hindsight. I understand his past deserves him to be called out, however, for once, he's ditched cup competition and focused on the bigger prize, in my eyes it's the correct call.

[brite blu sky]

+100 I'd say.
And PP you're right- no-one in their right minds would want him out which is why some on here would

I don't think anyone here would want him, like really want him out. I am angry with him 90% of the time, but wouldn't want him out, never ever.

But, let's stop with "pointless thread" thing. We are quite missing some interaction here, and I think this thread or others that spark a debate, a decent one, not ones that are piss-poor, are welcomed.
I was looking at the one after the incident in the weekend and a few old school posters, which are missed, came back. That's good for our community.

If its pointless why post on it?
I think what is pointless is having a forum where debate is stifled unless the debate follows a narrative that is acceptable to a certain percentage of posters.
It is very unhealthy to stifle/prevent posters from having a opinion that doesn't follow a certain line. Pep fucked up in the semi selecting a goalkeeper who had gifted Chelsea the previous semi, had a nightmare against Saints and is clearly not up to elite standard, these are unequivocally the facts of the matter. To disagree is one thing, to disparage/prevent people from voicing it is quite another.

This is a really good post HDS

You're saying that we all have the right to express what we want - no-one can argue with that, well some cunt might
It applies to everyone though doesn't it. None of us can have their cake and eat it without coming across as a cunt. We cant complain about someone expressing an opinion and then go telling everyone what they should think. That's the perfect defintion of a mard arse in my book.

Personally i just accept that i am not right, and it is not up to me to define right, the world does not revolve around me.
That helps as when i get it wrong i can take it on the fucking chin and not squeal to me mam about it.

Truth is there are a lot of good posters on here of all persuasions, plenty of characters and lots of opinions, thats healthy as you say.
i'm right - you're wrong just sinks us back down to the playground - does absolutely nothing and we learn nothing new.

A fact of life is that none of us actually has a handle on reality - we only think we do
and how we deal with that makes us who we are.
Pep is no different, Graham Potter or Gary fucking snot Neville

[Bluemoon4610]

+100 I'd say.
And PP you're right- no-one in their right minds would want him out which is why some on here would

I don't think anyone here would want him, like really want him out. I am angry with him 90% of the time, but wouldn't want him out, never ever.

But, let's stop with "pointless thread" thing. We are quite missing some interaction here, and I think this thread or others that spark a debate, a decent one, not ones that are piss-poor, are welcomed.
I was looking at the one after the incident in the weekend and a few old school posters, which are missed, came back. That's good for our community.

If its pointless why post on it?
I think what is pointless is having a forum where debate is stifled unless the debate follows a narrative that is acceptable to a certain percentage of posters.
It is very unhealthy to stifle/prevent posters from having a opinion that doesn't follow a certain line. Pep fucked up in the semi selecting a goalkeeper who had gifted Chelsea the previous semi, had a nightmare against Saints and is clearly not up to elite standard, these are unequivocally the facts of the matter. To disagree is one thing, to disparage/prevent people from voicing it is quite another.

Surely thinking a thread is pointless is also an opinion? And therefore equally valid?

[stupot]

+100 I'd say.
And PP you're right- no-one in their right minds would want him out which is why some on here would

.

Name one poster who said he wants him out ?

You want him out - you've said countless times you hate him and won't self combust when he goes like others and he's done no more than other managers we've had and with every outburst you sound more unhinged. You called him a Championship manager because without his 1st team he lost 3-2 to a full strength dippers.

i tell you who will self combust - you when he wins the Champions League this season. How will you have a go then.

[Harry Dowd scored]

+100 I'd say.
And PP you're right- no-one in their right minds would want him out which is why some on here would

I don't think anyone here would want him, like really want him out. I am angry with him 90% of the time, but wouldn't want him out, never ever.

But, let's stop with "pointless thread" thing. We are quite missing some interaction here, and I think this thread or others that spark a debate, a decent one, not ones that are piss-poor, are welcomed.
I was looking at the one after the incident in the weekend and a few old school posters, which are missed, came back. That's good for our community.

If its pointless why post on it?
I think what is pointless is having a forum where debate is stifled unless the debate follows a narrative that is acceptable to a certain percentage of posters.
It is very unhealthy to stifle/prevent posters from having a opinion that doesn't follow a certain line. Pep fucked up in the semi selecting a goalkeeper who had gifted Chelsea the previous semi, had a nightmare against Saints and is clearly not up to elite standard, these are unequivocally the facts of the matter. To disagree is one thing, to disparage/prevent people from voicing it is quite another.

Surely thinking a thread is pointless is also an opinion? And therefore equally valid?

Well, if you read the post again, you will see a ? at the end of “ If it’s pointless why post on it” That means I am asking the question whether it is pointless or not, therefore I am not stating thread is pointless.
Hope that clarifies that for you.