stupot wrote:carl_feedthegoat wrote:stupot wrote:Last time we had a chat about him was before the semi and look how that turned out.
There was a lot of people at fault for the goals conceded last night- Stones and Zinch 1st goal, Fern and Laporte 2nd goal, 3rd goal was a really harsh pen but Foden lost the ball and gave a stupid free kick in the process which led to the pen.
Ederson wasn't at fault for any, their 1st 2 goals were fabulous finishes
1st goal no - 2nd goal he was piss poor and he was also piss poor for the penalty, IMO.
His distribution was abysmal - put us in the back foot many times because of it and they could have easily scored .
He got 5 out of ten for a reason by most pundits .
In summary - he was fucking shit .
If we're going on pundits ratings most pundits gave Laporte a higher mark than Dias.
Let’s go on a goalkeeping specialist then shall we .
But specialist goalkeeping analyst John Harrison, who has a Cambridge astronomy PhD, believes the City keeper could have done more to keep out the strike during the enthralling 4-3 win for the home side at the Etihad Stadium
On his Twitter account, Harrison broke down step-by-step how Ederson could have better dealt with Vinicius after he made his way into the City penalty area.
He wrote: 'Ederson is usually exceptional vs close range 1v1s but he was uncharacteristically weak vs Vini.
'Ederson correctly holds deep for Vini’s first touch in the box but he needs to start closing the space once Vini takes the second touch! Waiting till the third touch is too late!'
Harrison's analysis has earned rave reviews recently, most notably from Sky Sports