PeterParker wrote:I wonder if today footballers have any idea what passion and desire mean.
These days money only matters. Only.
PeterParker wrote:I wonder if today footballers have any idea what passion and desire mean.
sheblue wrote:Makes the game on 3rd of Jan even bigger now.
Loose that and it's an up hill battle.
zuricity wrote:You weakened the squad when you insisted on bringing Mahrez in Pep.
Clowncrete wrote:zuricity wrote:You weakened the squad when you insisted on bringing Mahrez in Pep.
How? We needed depth in the wings. Which other winger would you have purchased who would be a willing bench player when asked?
Mase wrote:Clowncrete wrote:zuricity wrote:You weakened the squad when you insisted on bringing Mahrez in Pep.
How? We needed depth in the wings. Which other winger would you have purchased who would be a willing bench player when asked?
He's not a "winger" though like Raza or Sanè. He never goes passed his man, always cuts back on to his left foot. That's not a winger.
Mase wrote:Clowncrete wrote:zuricity wrote:You weakened the squad when you insisted on bringing Mahrez in Pep.
How? We needed depth in the wings. Which other winger would you have purchased who would be a willing bench player when asked?
He's not a "winger" though like Raza or Sanè. He never goes passed his man, always cuts back on to his left foot. That's not a winger.
zuricity wrote:Mase wrote:Clowncrete wrote:zuricity wrote:You weakened the squad when you insisted on bringing Mahrez in Pep.
How? We needed depth in the wings. Which other winger would you have purchased who would be a willing bench player when asked?
He's not a "winger" though like Raza or Sanè. He never goes passed his man, always cuts back on to his left foot. That's not a winger.
Saved me saying it .
Clowncrete wrote:zuricity wrote:Mase wrote:Clowncrete wrote:zuricity wrote:You weakened the squad when you insisted on bringing Mahrez in Pep.
How? We needed depth in the wings. Which other winger would you have purchased who would be a willing bench player when asked?
He's not a "winger" though like Raza or Sanè. He never goes passed his man, always cuts back on to his left foot. That's not a winger.
Saved me saying it .
OK. But which player would you have purchased who would be a willing bench player and plays in that position?
Clowncrete wrote:zuricity wrote:Mase wrote:Clowncrete wrote:zuricity wrote:You weakened the squad when you insisted on bringing Mahrez in Pep.
How? We needed depth in the wings. Which other winger would you have purchased who would be a willing bench player when asked?
He's not a "winger" though like Raza or Sanè. He never goes passed his man, always cuts back on to his left foot. That's not a winger.
Saved me saying it .
OK. But which player would you have purchased who would be a willing bench player and plays in that position?
City64 wrote:Worst tactical fuck up and performance for quite a while . So many players just not at it and that fucking pearler of a goal for Palace fuck me that’s worthy of winning any game . Get this one out the system and move on no point on dwelling on it and Northern Rail are fucking shit !!!!!
Hope I’m home for MOTD good night !
zuricity wrote:
Why does it have to involve purchases ?
ask Carl what he thinks about using players like Sancho , 60 mill saved and a little wage increase - and three points against Scousepool .
Mase wrote:With Walker, he played most of last season for us and for England throughout the summer. This seaso. He barely gets a rest because we don't have cover.
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: carolina-blue, gmercer1, ian494, Majestic-12 [Bot], Sparklehorse, Stan, Two's Kompany and 65 guests