Douglas Higginbottom wrote:There is no doubt,win or lose,that matchday evenings are lit up by Carl and his considered thoughts.
You are being overly generous in describing them as "thoughts", let alone considered ones! :)
Douglas Higginbottom wrote:There is no doubt,win or lose,that matchday evenings are lit up by Carl and his considered thoughts.
DoomMerchant wrote:Cocacolajojo wrote:
First goal the player has the entire goal to shoot at. Perhaps could have stood closer to the post but in that situation when Kompany sells him short, it's a tricky one.
Second corner goes in low so Joe can't parry it and then Demi let's go of his man. What you could get at that point is a reaction save but if you don't get it you can't really fault him for it as the trajectory of the ball is so steep.
Worst keeper of the league, you're having a laugh.
Honestly you can't name 3 keepers having a poorer season than him. I bet the stats would show he has the poorest shots vs goals conceded ratio in the league.
Crossie wrote:Stop moaning, we've scored 103 goals! Who gives a fuck if Hart etc make the odd mistake? We are so good at the other end it's fine.
DoomMerchant wrote:Crossie wrote:Stop moaning, we've scored 103 goals! Who gives a fuck if Hart etc make the odd mistake? We are so good at the other end it's fine.
It won't be fine vs the CL opposition we face in Feb. I can promise you that.
Douglas Higginbottom wrote:The Joe Hart situation to day is interesting.Whilst I don't go for the hammering he gets from some on here there is no doubt overall he hasn't been great this season.That's why he was correctly dropped.Pellers brought him back I believe because a) I think he rates him as our best keeper and b) because Pants was starting to show worrying signs and let one or two in he shouldn't have. Against Cardiff I would not at all blame him for the goal.The mistakes were in allowing the guy to come into the box so easily and then by Vinnie who should have showed him to the line.I don't think Joe was at fault for letting the ball in at "his near post" as he basically had either side to shoot in and if he got it right,as he did,there was no chance. As for the 2nd goal on the surface it might seem he was at fault but I am not so sure.The ball swung over was fairly well hit and quite flat and I was quite surprised it wasn't headed at the near post by somebody.Had Joe gone for it there and someone flicked it in he would have been at fault as he could not have got there first.Then I look at Demechelis who just switched off and allowed Campbell to knock it in.There's probably the real culprit. I wonder what SoFu's reading of it is?
Douglas Higginbottom wrote:The Joe Hart situation to day is interesting.Whilst I don't go for the hammering he gets from some on here there is no doubt overall he hasn't been great this season.That's why he was correctly dropped.Pellers brought him back I believe because a) I think he rates him as our best keeper and b) because Pants was starting to show worrying signs and let one or two in he shouldn't have.
Against Cardiff I would not at all blame him for the goal.The mistakes were in allowing the guy to come into the box so easily and then by Vinnie who should have showed him to the line.I don't think Joe was at fault for letting the ball in at "his near post" as he basically had either side to shoot in and if he got it right,as he did,there was no chance.
As for the 2nd goal on the surface it might seem he was at fault but I am not so sure.The ball swung over was fairly well hit and quite flat and I was quite surprised it wasn't headed at the near post by somebody.Had Joe gone for it there and someone flicked it in he would have been at fault as he could not have got there first.Then I look at Demechelis who just switched off and allowed Campbell to knock it in.There's probably the real culprit.
I wonder what SoFu's reading of it is?
zuricity wrote:
Easy, Nastasic is much better than both of them.
gillie wrote:Carl is wrong Lescott is our best defender.Defender being the operative word because yes he is not very good at distributing the ball but neither is Vinny some of his passes are shocking but they know how to defend.Demichelis and Nastasic are crap defenders one is headstrung and the other is still learning the game.There is a reason we won the league that reason was we had the best defenders.The centre backs were Kompany and Lescott.Surely not rocket science Carl?
carl_feedthegoat wrote:gillie wrote:Carl is wrong Lescott is our best defender.Defender being the operative word because yes he is not very good at distributing the ball but neither is Vinny some of his passes are shocking but they know how to defend.Demichelis and Nastasic are crap defenders one is headstrung and the other is still learning the game.There is a reason we won the league that reason was we had the best defenders.The centre backs were Kompany and Lescott.Surely not rocket science Carl?
So in a nut shell..you are saying Pellers has got it all wrong....
Alrighty then........
Douglas Higginbottom wrote:There is no doubt,win or lose,that matchday evenings are lit up by Carl and his considered thoughts.
"That he could argue Boyata's stupid red card was Lescott's fault with a straight face tells you already what a clown he is. Pointless waste of time.
That was a gem but they just keep coming and are worth popping in for a look.
gillie wrote:carl_feedthegoat wrote:gillie wrote:Carl is wrong Lescott is our best defender.Defender being the operative word because yes he is not very good at distributing the ball but neither is Vinny some of his passes are shocking but they know how to defend.Demichelis and Nastasic are crap defenders one is headstrung and the other is still learning the game.There is a reason we won the league that reason was we had the best defenders.The centre backs were Kompany and Lescott.Surely not rocket science Carl?
So in a nut shell..you are saying Pellers has got it all wrong....
Alrighty then........
In a word YES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
You do realise that a keeper should never really be beaten on the near post ?Ted Hughes wrote:Being quite close to the action & side on ish & seeing the lousy attempts to defend the first goal by Demichelis & Vinny (let him come inside & shoot ? Really ?), I felt unable to comment on Joe hart's part in the disaster.
Having now just watched it, I can only assume that in the case of those complaining:
A: he shagged your girlfriend/boyfriend
B: you are fucking blind
C: you are partial to hallucinogenic drugs.
From the space Vinny left their player, I would have scored either side of Joe Hart & been absolutely gutted if I didn't. He was fucking hung out to dry by shite defending.
As for the 2nd, MDM shite.
Other than the back 4 & finishing though, I think I agree with the Count that our 1st half was as good as anything we have done.
We did the pressing thing really well in their half, even in the final 3rd & kept stealing the ball. We left our defenders with almost nothing to do (which was still too much for them). On another day the game would have been over by half time.
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot], Mase and 102 guests