
ant london wrote:Other than the hysterical tone, I don't really see what is wrong with the article in content.
As Goataldo says, some nuggets of truth in there I am positive.
Also, as regards a "blanket ban" on comments, I would be certain they'd been told absolutely no negative or "happy you're gone" type comments. But no-one has even said that they wish him well, and I am positive that if they wanted to say that there would be no issue from the club's side. The fact that there hasn't been a peep of wellwishing says it all IMO

Dubciteh wrote:He was right to have a go at hart after the derby, some of the stuff described in the article seem fine to me, players need an ear bashing from time to time.just look at bacon face and his hair dryer, he is lauded for that treatment!

Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:Dubciteh wrote:He was right to have a go at hart after the derby, some of the stuff described in the article seem fine to me, players need an ear bashing from time to time.just look at bacon face and his hair dryer, he is lauded for that treatment!
And the infamous double training session. It was well known even at the time that the other one was tactics walkthrough. I never saw anything wrong with that. Players need bollocking every now and then. That's integral part of football.

Hazy2 wrote:Well you give A.Campbell a job this what you get. IMHO we may have let a manager go coz Joe Hart is a soft spoilt cunt, who did not like the truth, add a massive spin offensive on a level never seen before at City. New manager will give the kids a go, yep thats happening. More spin Today FFS.

Im_Spartacus wrote:
Blame the players all you want, but in my experience, if my manager ever treated me like a cunt, firstly he will fail at his job, and at some point down the line I'd make fucking sure he lost it if he carried on pissing me off.
Im_Spartacus wrote:Hazy2 wrote:Well you give A.Campbell a job this what you get. IMHO we may have let a manager go coz Joe Hart is a soft spoilt cunt, who did not like the truth, add a massive spin offensive on a level never seen before at City. New manager will give the kids a go, yep thats happening. More spin Today FFS.
It seems spin is needed if half the retards on here can't see that Mancini's position was untenable through his own shortcomings
Blame the players all you want, but in my experience, if my manager ever treated me like a cunt, firstly he will fail at his job, and at some point down the line I'd make fucking sure he lost it if he carried on pissing me off.
Rightly or wrongly, the likes of Hart and Kompany are virtually in sellable at city, so Mancini couldn't just ship those out who he didn't get on with - and that's where his problem lies, he hasn't got a fucking clue how to deal with people other than getting rid.
Whilst the saying goes that no one player is bigger than the club, the same is also true for the manager.


Mase wrote:
If you were being paid £200k a week would you be arsed about being treated like a cunt? Honestly?!

Niall Quinns Discopants wrote: I never think that I put that bit of extra effort for my boss, I do it for the customer. The people who actually pay my wages. Same way these spoiled bastards should remember they are performing for supporters. But modern Football players are so far removed from ordinary people that majority of them would have no idea. They start crying because someone said a few harsh words to them.

Mase wrote:
If you were being paid £200k a week would you be arsed about being treated like a cunt? Honestly?!

Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:
Unprofessional. I never think that I put that bit of extra effort for my boss, I do it for the customer. The people who actually pay my wages. Same way these spoiled bastards should remember they are performing for supporters. But modern Football players are so far removed from ordinary people that majority of them would have no idea. They start crying because someone saidvfew harsh words to them.

Im_Spartacus wrote:Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:Unprofessional. I never think that I put that bit of extra effort for my boss, I do it for the customer. The people who actually pay my wages. Same way these spoiled bastards should remember they are performing for supporters. But modern Football players are so far removed from ordinary people that majority of them would have no idea. They start crying because someone saidvfew harsh words to them.
Does the customer motivate you?
It should be a factor in what you do, but the customer doesnt inspire you to achieve at work

Im_Spartacus wrote:Hazy2 wrote:Well you give A.Campbell a job this what you get. IMHO we may have let a manager go coz Joe Hart is a soft spoilt cunt, who did not like the truth, add a massive spin offensive on a level never seen before at City. New manager will give the kids a go, yep thats happening. More spin Today FFS.
It seems spin is needed if half the retards on here can't see that Mancini's position was untenable through his own shortcomings
Blame the players all you want, but in my experience, if my manager ever treated me like a cunt, firstly he will fail at his job, and at some point down the line I'd make fucking sure he lost it if he carried on pissing me off.
Rightly or wrongly, the likes of Hart and Kompany are virtually in sellable at city, so Mancini couldn't just ship those out who he didn't get on with - and that's where his problem lies, he hasn't got a fucking clue how to deal with people other than getting rid.
Whilst the saying goes that no one player is bigger than the club, the same is also true for the manager.
zuricity wrote:carl_feedthegoat wrote:Not ONE player has publicly wished Mancini well.........whys that then?
1. Has any player been publicly asked his thoughts on the sacking ?
2. Why does a player have to publicly reveal his thoughts on Mancini good or bad , in the immediate period after his sacking?
3. Perhaps any player for or against Mancini has been told by the club not to say anything , good or bad , publicly.
4. Why should a player risk his future at the club by publicly backing the sacked manager ? , look what happened to Bellamy.
Carl , as far as the players are concerned, i'm not interested in hearing who is for or against him. some will be for him, some against him. It's usually those who don't want to tow the line and Ladyarse chooses three good examples in Bellamy, Tevez and Ade here.
It's a cheap shot from a sad arsed reporter, who chooses now to make such a report . He had ample time before the Cup Final to put this crap out.
'double training sessions' a problem ? Come on Dougie will confirm that was not the case, perhaps needed at the time to get fitness levels higher.
no it's not the worst ever article written though. I hope Ladyman nips into MaryDs on sunday to get some more gossip !

carl_feedthegoat wrote:zuricity wrote:carl_feedthegoat wrote:Not ONE player has publicly wished Mancini well.........whys that then?
1. Has any player been publicly asked his thoughts on the sacking ?
2. Why does a player have to publicly reveal his thoughts on Mancini good or bad , in the immediate period after his sacking?
3. Perhaps any player for or against Mancini has been told by the club not to say anything , good or bad , publicly.
4. Why should a player risk his future at the club by publicly backing the sacked manager ? , look what happened to Bellamy.
Carl , as far as the players are concerned, i'm not interested in hearing who is for or against him. some will be for him, some against him. It's usually those who don't want to tow the line and Ladyarse chooses three good examples in Bellamy, Tevez and Ade here.
It's a cheap shot from a sad arsed reporter, who chooses now to make such a report . He had ample time before the Cup Final to put this crap out.
'double training sessions' a problem ? Come on Dougie will confirm that was not the case, perhaps needed at the time to get fitness levels higher.
no it's not the worst ever article written though. I hope Ladyman nips into MaryDs on sunday to get some more gossip !
What amazes me is that fans will jump on anything that doesnt suit their agenda and laugh it off as untrue because the source of the article is written in a newspaper or by a journo that is deemed full of shite or biased!
The same fuckign fans will also quote articles that do suit their agenda no matter where it came from.......you couldnt make it up.!!!
There is nearly always some truth in an article,wether or not it came from this cunt Ladyman OR from some other source.Its a case of focusing and discussing the possible truths rather than the shite thats added onto the piece.
Play
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: AFKAE, Google [Bot], john@staustell, Majestic-12 [Bot], Mase and 175 guests