The mancityfans.net football forum

s1ty m wrote:I thought Sterling was woeful. Poor control, poor choices, profligate in from t of goal, etc. He's not alone, Vancelo was laughable in his defending and Rodri reverted to the Rodri of 2 years ago. City half-arsed it. 3 points but they could have done the Goal Difference a power of good.

Grealish? That's another conversation.

s1ty m wrote:I thought Sterling was woeful. Poor control, poor choices, profligate in from t of goal, etc. He's not alone, Vancelo was laughable in his defending and Rodri reverted to the Rodri of 2 years ago. City half-arsed it. 3 points but they could have done the Goal Difference a power of good.

Grealish? That's another conversation.

s1ty m wrote:I thought Sterling was woeful. Poor control, poor choices, profligate in from t of goal, etc. He's not alone, Vancelo was laughable in his defending and Rodri reverted to the Rodri of 2 years ago. City half-arsed it. 3 points but they could have done the Goal Difference a power of good.

Grealish? That's another conversation.

Mase wrote:

s1ty m wrote:I thought Sterling was woeful. Poor control, poor choices, profligate in from t of goal, etc. He's not alone, Vancelo was laughable in his defending and Rodri reverted to the Rodri of 2 years ago. City half-arsed it. 3 points but they could have done the Goal Difference a power of good.

Grealish? That's another conversation.

Grealish was genuinely one of our best players. Driving forward constantly and really unlucky not to score. He created a lot.

s1ty m wrote:I thought Sterling was woeful. Poor control, poor choices, profligate in from t of goal, etc. He's not alone, Vancelo was laughable in his defending and Rodri reverted to the Rodri of 2 years ago. City half-arsed it. 3 points but they could have done the Goal Difference a power of good.

Grealish? That's another conversation.

johnny crossan wrote:

s1ty m wrote:I thought Sterling was woeful. Poor control, poor choices, profligate in from t of goal, etc. He's not alone, Vancelo was laughable in his defending and Rodri reverted to the Rodri of 2 years ago. City half-arsed it. 3 points but they could have done the Goal Difference a power of good.

Grealish? That's another conversation.

laugh a line post - well done

zuricity wrote:

s1ty m wrote:I thought Sterling was woeful. Poor control, poor choices, profligate in from t of goal, etc. He's not alone, Vancelo was laughable in his defending and Rodri reverted to the Rodri of 2 years ago. City half-arsed it. 3 points but they could have done the Goal Difference a power of good.

Grealish? That's another conversation.

You are correct, Sterling cost us a 7-0 romp.

Jack ? Still not good enough . That header should have been buried bottom right Corner. Further , he chose options to go alone when others were in better positions. He's good , but certainly not 100 mill good.

s1ty m wrote:

zuricity wrote:

s1ty m wrote:I thought Sterling was woeful. Poor control, poor choices, profligate in from t of goal, etc. He's not alone, Vancelo was laughable in his defending and Rodri reverted to the Rodri of 2 years ago. City half-arsed it. 3 points but they could have done the Goal Difference a power of good.

Grealish? That's another conversation.

You are correct, Sterling cost us a 7-0 romp.

Jack ? Still not good enough . That header should have been buried bottom right Corner. Further , he chose options to go alone when others were in better positions. He's good , but certainly not 100 mill good.

Sterling did some things that were schoolboy bad. His control is so suspect and his choices often beggar belief. Kun in that side might have had 6. Grealish is an issue...saying he'll be good is fine, I so hope he does but he just seems miles away from the level we have achieved. Miles away. Driving at defenders is great but the end product was what? He needs time? OK, fair enough, but does he need 10 touches every time he receives the ball? City look electrifying when it's played quickly, so far that seems beyond him.

Mase wrote:Grealish was directly involved in creating two of our three goals

zuricity wrote:

Mase wrote:Grealish was directly involved in creating two of our three goals

Mase , recently we scored a goal where all eleven were involved. I think it was on some Stage in a Theater not so far away , help me, Theater of Dreamers ?

Mase wrote:

zuricity wrote:

Mase wrote:Grealish was directly involved in creating two of our three goals

Mase , recently we scored a goal where all eleven were involved. I think it was on some Stage in a Theatre not so far away , help me, Theater of Dreamers ?

Theatre of Wet Dreams. paint

zuricity wrote:

Mase wrote:

zuricity wrote:

Mase wrote:Grealish was directly involved in creating two of our three goals

Mase , recently we scored a goal where all eleven were involved. I think it was on some Stage in a Theatre not so far away , help me, Theater of Dreamers ?

Theatre of Wet Dreams. paint

Corrected... must be like watching it dry there.

zuricity wrote:

s1ty m wrote:

zuricity wrote:

s1ty m wrote:I thought Sterling was woeful. Poor control, poor choices, profligate in from t of goal, etc. He's not alone, Vancelo was laughable in his defending and Rodri reverted to the Rodri of 2 years ago. City half-arsed it. 3 points but they could have done the Goal Difference a power of good.

Grealish? That's another conversation.

You are correct, Sterling cost us a 7-0 romp.

Jack ? Still not good enough . That header should have been buried bottom right Corner. Further , he chose options to go alone when others were in better positions. He's good , but certainly not 100 mill good.

Sterling did some things that were schoolboy bad. His control is so suspect and his choices often beggar belief. Kun in that side might have had 6. Grealish is an issue...saying he'll be good is fine, I so hope he does but he just seems miles away from the level we have achieved. Miles away. Driving at defenders is great but the end product was what? He needs time? OK, fair enough, but does he need 10 touches every time he receives the ball? City look electrifying when it's played quickly, so far that seems beyond him.

btw , I don't mean Rodri, he's rapidly becoming the Stalwart in midfield. He has been playing brilliantly for months now - making Fern's life easier. Cancelo was ok today.

zuricity wrote:

Mase wrote:

zuricity wrote:

Mase wrote:Grealish was directly involved in creating two of our three goals

Mase , recently we scored a goal where all eleven were involved. I think it was on some Stage in a Theatre not so far away , help me, Theater of Dreamers ?

Theatre of Wet Dreams. paint

Corrected... must be like watching it dry there.