The mancityfans.net football forum

City64 wrote:^^^^^^^ just the 9 changes you thick boring cunt .

Justified logic wrote:

City64 wrote:^^^^^^^ just the 9 changes you thick boring cunt .

No need to be abusive you ...thick boring cunt.

So, state what those 9 changes were...

Slim wrote:"If they've got 2 better midfield players than Billing, I'd like to see them play"
-Danny Murphy after 25 minutes.


Seems his mind was made up then.

City64 wrote:

Justified logic wrote:

City64 wrote:^^^^^^^ just the 9 changes you thick boring cunt .

No need to be abusive you ...thick boring cunt.

So, state what those 9 changes were...

You see its like this , Huddersfield never fielded there strongest eleven against us . Did you mention that in any of your usual cuntish posts ??? The fact of the matter is Huddersfield made 9 changes FACT !!! Whether you actually go to any City games or your a plastic cunt or just a wanker isn't any business of mine but when you post cuntish posts and especially RETARD comments aimed at me you can fuck right off sunshine .

Justified logic wrote:

bigblue wrote:

City64 wrote:

Justified logic wrote:Huddersfield using pretty much the same team as before. Their big goal scorers and assisters are on the bench or missing - Kachunga, Wells, Palmer, Smith, Brown, Schindler.

9 changes for Huddersfield as they face Newcastle on Saturday .Sort your head out !

Except for those 9 changes, it's pretty much the same team as before.

Yes, pretty much the same team as when we played them before.

Justified logic wrote:

City64 wrote:

Justified logic wrote:

City64 wrote:^^^^^^^ just the 9 changes you thick boring cunt .

No need to be abusive you ...thick boring cunt.

So, state what those 9 changes were...

You see its like this , Huddersfield never fielded there strongest eleven against us . Did you mention that in any of your usual cuntish posts ??? The fact of the matter is Huddersfield made 9 changes FACT !!! Whether you actually go to any City games or your a plastic cunt or just a wanker isn't any business of mine but when you post cuntish posts and especially RETARD comments aimed at me you can fuck right off sunshine .

Justified logic wrote:

bigblue wrote:

City64 wrote:

Justified logic wrote:Huddersfield using pretty much the same team as before. Their big goal scorers and assisters are on the bench or missing - Kachunga, Wells, Palmer, Smith, Brown, Schindler.

9 changes for Huddersfield as they face Newcastle on Saturday .Sort your head out !

Except for those 9 changes, it's pretty much the same team as before.

Yes, pretty much the same team as when we played them before.

Idiot. Lay off the Stella you cuntish plastic cunt wanker cuntish RETARD you can fuck right off. sunshine.

City64 wrote:Save your breath Beefy he is a total cock !

johnny crossan wrote:

City64 wrote:Save your breath Beefy he is a total cock !

he's an oxymoron

Beefymcfc wrote:Are you saying 'Near enough the same team as last time we played them'?

And C64 is saying '9 changes since the last time they played', obviously not against us?

Justified logic wrote:

Beefymcfc wrote:Are you saying 'Near enough the same team as last time we played them'?

And C64 is saying '9 changes since the last time they played', obviously not against us?

Yes. I am saying that - because the thread was about us and them. If I'd meant the same team as their last game I'd have said that but I wouldn't have because it's not correct.

I fail to see how "as before" could be construed as "as their last game" without context to suggest that was what was meant.

City64, do you ever sober up or are you just congenitally stupid?

And whilst I'm about it JC, you like to take a pot shot at me whenever you can but although you try to make out that you're intelligent by throwing around long words like the pseud you are, you're too dim to realise that my moniker is a self-deprecating wordplay on 'Just defied logic'.

Justified logic wrote:And whilst I'm about it JC, you like to take a pot shot at me whenever you can but although you try to make out that you're intelligent by throwing around long words like the pseud you are, you're too dim to realise that my moniker is a self-deprecating wordplay on 'Just defied logic'.

johnny crossan wrote:

Justified logic wrote:And whilst I'm about it JC, you like to take a pot shot at me whenever you can but although you try to make out that you're intelligent by throwing around long words like the pseud you are, you're too dim to realise that my moniker is a self-deprecating wordplay on 'Just defied logic'.

silly me, I thought it was a self-congratulatory wordplay - could also be 'Just deified logic' which is closer to how you like to delude yourself or 'Just iffy logic' which is actually a better measure of your plankton level thought processes.

Justified logic wrote:

johnny crossan wrote:

Justified logic wrote:And whilst I'm about it JC, you like to take a pot shot at me whenever you can but although you try to make out that you're intelligent by throwing around long words like the pseud you are, you're too dim to realise that my moniker is a self-deprecating wordplay on 'Just defied logic'.

silly me, I thought it was a self-congratulatory wordplay - could also be 'Just deified logic' which is closer to how you like to delude yourself or 'Just iffy logic' which is actually a better measure of your plankton level thought processes.

Ooh, you're too witty.

johnny crossan wrote:

Justified logic wrote:

johnny crossan wrote:

Justified logic wrote:And whilst I'm about it JC, you like to take a pot shot at me whenever you can but although you try to make out that you're intelligent by throwing around long words like the pseud you are, you're too dim to realise that my moniker is a self-deprecating wordplay on 'Just defied logic'.

silly me, I thought it was a self-congratulatory wordplay - could also be 'Just deified logic' which is closer to how you like to delude yourself or 'Just iffy logic' which is actually a better measure of your plankton level thought processes.

Ooh, you're too witty.

I'm pleased you noticed, it's good to give your single brain cell an occasional workout - well done .

Justified logic wrote:

Beefymcfc wrote:Are you saying 'Near enough the same team as last time we played them'?

And C64 is saying '9 changes since the last time they played', obviously not against us?

Yes. I am saying that - because the thread was about us and them. If I'd meant the same team as their last game I'd have said that but I wouldn't have because it's not correct.

I fail to see how "as before" could be construed as "as their last game" without context to suggest that was what was meant.

City64, do you ever sober up or are you just congenitally stupid?

And whilst I'm about it JC, you like to take a pot shot at me whenever you can but although you try to make out that you're intelligent by throwing around long words like the pseud you are, you're too dim to realise that my moniker is a self-deprecating wordplay on'Just defied logic'.

iwasthere2012 wrote:

Justified logic wrote:

Beefymcfc wrote:Are you saying 'Near enough the same team as last time we played them'?

And C64 is saying '9 changes since the last time they played', obviously not against us?

Yes. I am saying that - because the thread was about us and them. If I'd meant the same team as their last game I'd have said that but I wouldn't have because it's not correct.

I fail to see how "as before" could be construed as "as their last game" without context to suggest that was what was meant.

City64, do you ever sober up or are you just congenitally stupid?

And whilst I'm about it JC, you like to take a pot shot at me whenever you can but although you try to make out that you're intelligent by throwing around long words like the pseud you are, you're too dim to realise that my moniker is a self-deprecating wordplay on'Just defied logic'.

I knew it!

City64 wrote:

iwasthere2012 wrote:

Justified logic wrote:

Beefymcfc wrote:Are you saying 'Near enough the same team as last time we played them'?

And C64 is saying '9 changes since the last time they played', obviously not against us?

Yes. I am saying that - because the thread was about us and them. If I'd meant the same team as their last game I'd have said that but I wouldn't have because it's not correct.

I fail to see how "as before" could be construed as "as their last game" without context to suggest that was what was meant.

City64, do you ever sober up or are you just congenitally stupid?

And whilst I'm about it JC, you like to take a pot shot at me whenever you can but although you try to make out that you're intelligent by throwing around long words like the pseud you are, you're too dim to realise that my moniker is a self-deprecating wordplay on'Just defied logic'.

I knew it!

Haha very good .

johnny crossan wrote:

Justified logic wrote:

johnny crossan wrote:

Justified logic wrote:And whilst I'm about it JC, you like to take a pot shot at me whenever you can but although you try to make out that you're intelligent by throwing around long words like the pseud you are, you're too dim to realise that my moniker is a self-deprecating wordplay on 'Just defied logic'.

silly me, I thought it was a self-congratulatory wordplay - could also be 'Just deified logic' which is closer to how you like to delude yourself or 'Just iffy logic' which is actually a better measure of your plankton level thought processes.

Ooh, you're too witty.

I'm pleased you noticed, it's good to give your single brain cell an occasional workout - well done .

Original Dub wrote:

Justified logic wrote:

Beefymcfc wrote:Are you saying 'Near enough the same team as last time we played them'?

And C64 is saying '9 changes since the last time they played', obviously not against us?

Yes. I am saying that - because the thread was about us and them. If I'd meant the same team as their last game I'd have said that but I wouldn't have because it's not correct.

I fail to see how "as before" could be construed as "as their last game" without context to suggest that was what was meant.

City64, do you ever sober up or are you just congenitally stupid?

And whilst I'm about it JC, you like to take a pot shot at me whenever you can but although you try to make out that you're intelligent by throwing around long words like the pseud you are, you're too dim to realise that my moniker is a self-deprecating wordplay on 'Just defied logic'.

Ah you're all way too clever for me.

Mind = BLOWN