***city v liverpool official match thread***

[BookJunior]

The FA want more money ...

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/39333531

The cards are stacked against us by UEFA and the FA.

[Original Dub]

I'm telling you it's edited to suit the brand.

They must think we're children. Reading through some rections on here after the match they're probably right.

Great game fair result. And the highlights reel on sky since proves it.

[Peter Doherty (AGAIG)]

The other thing is that sky failed to show the replay of several offside calls......did they only choose to show the ones that were actually offside, I remember Sterling being insensed after one decision....and what do you known...no replay!

Where I sit in the stadium I can see the television monitors on the gantry where the commentators sit. Whenever a call is wrong and goes against us it does not get replayed (particularly off-sides) but any chance of casting an aspersion on us if we score a goal and it is non-stop replays. I can always tell if we've been screwed as sky don't show a replay.

[Scatman]

The FA want more money ...

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/39333531

The cards are stacked against us by UEFA and the FA.

And its the first time players have argued with the ref is it? Cunts.

[Beefymcfc]

I looked at that incident and instantly thought that we'd get charged even though there was no chasing or harrassing from the players, just Dave having a word.

How bad is it when i automatically think that!

[Justified logic]

I'm telling you it's edited to suit the brand.

They must think we're children. Reading through some rections on here after the match they're probably right.

Great game fair result. And the highlights reel on sky since proves it.

Don't have Sky as I wouldn't pay good money for shit so don't know what you mean.

[Justified logic]

The other thing is that sky failed to show the replay of several offside calls......did they only choose to show the ones that were actually offside, I remember Sterling being insensed after one decision....and what do you known...no replay!

Where I sit in the stadium I can see the television monitors on the gantry where the commentators sit. Whenever a call is wrong and goes against us it does not get replayed (particularly off-sides) but any chance of casting an aspersion on us if we score a goal and it is non-stop replays. I can always tell if we've been screwed as sky don't show a replay.

Is NBCSN owned by News Corp? They didn't show replays either. Anyway, I was under the impression that the footage was shot by a 'camera company' and syndicated, if that's the right word, to the various TV companies to do their own commentary on.

[City64]

This FA charge just about sums it all up for me .

The Premier League Is Bent And The Rag Exec Run FA And Sky Are Bang At It !!!

Anyone notice this pattern of events ........ West Ham at home , Sky go huge on Aguero elbow , Aguero gets 4 game ban from FA . Chelsea at home . Rag cunt ref shafts us big time with a whole host of openly corrupt decisions , game turned on its head and we end up with 9 men on the pitch and both get banned , no punishment on or off the pitch for Chelsea and err was it Sky again covering the game massively editing all the decisions that went against us ??? getting rid of the evidence ??? Oh and now this shit ...... FA charge us , Sky show the game live we get shafted by the officials then Sky "produce" some shit edited footage to "help" the FA charge us for fuck all !!!

and it goes on and on and on and on and on .........................

[Dimples]

This season has gone to a new level - they are not even trying to hide it anymore.
The script is: get the Rags in the top 4, get City out of the top 4. Use the refs to implement.
It makes no difference if it is obvious. Use Sky(who are driving this agenda) to bury a lot of it by selective replays.
The FA will impose bans on City for the slightest thing, whilst ignoring the Rags thuggery, etc...

A pound to a penny there is a power struggle going on behind closed doors.
Our club Vs. Sky, FA, etc...

Next season will tell who has won.

[Hazy2]

BBC just shown the highlights. No mention of the Penalty. I think this is the chance now for either an acceptance or all guns blazing. The fact a lot of it is on our pitch. Will make it very easy for the club. Here is the DVD take a look and lets go through every incident. The frustration is season long not just the 19/3 where're we see another appalling performance from all officials.Time to tackle the bullies.

[Original Dub]

Based on what transpired on the pitch we were a little lucky to get a point.
Aguero missed alot of chances but that Lallana miss was by far worse and much more of a certain goal.

Draw is probably about right I'd say.

You're mentally challenged

I see tossing around insults is your go-to move.
Care to elaborate where you think i was wrong in my opinion and actually discuss it?

Oh but I've tried to do that before. In fact I called you out 4 times in the same thread when you went missing.

As I've said before, I'm ok with people wanting to learn a new sport.
But you don't seem to want to.

How can you say city were LUCKY yesterday?

Once again you have nothing to say.

[Saul Goodman]

Sorry chap. I dont check this website very often during the week. I didn't even see your last post.

City were lucky to get a draw because, as i said, based on what transpired on the pitch (which means everything including ref decisions, whether they were right or wrong) Liverpool had the better chance to earn all 3 points. And by that i mean the Lallana chance.

If youre going to get into poor refereeing and/or hypotheticals then that is an entirely different argument. I specifically said based on what occurred in the match.

[Dub City]

Sorry chap. I dont check this website very often during the week. I didn't even see your last post.

City were lucky to get a draw because, as i said, based on what transpired on the pitch (which means everything including ref decisions, whether they were right or wrong) Liverpool had the better chance to earn all 3 points. And by that i mean the Lallana chance.

If youre going to get into poor refereeing and/or hypotheticals then that is an entirely different argument. I specifically said based on what occurred in the match.

Surely the best chance was Sterling when he was fouled with a tap in in 6 yard box there for him. Poor referring is not a different argument at all in this case.

[mr_nool]

KdB hitting the post was a half decent chance as well...

[Original Dub]

As was aguero's point blank miss.

No, I don't get your opinion on this at all saul goodman.

Even the pundits admitted afterwards that we had the better chances.

Include the fact that we should have had a penalty and they would have been down to ten men and you could all but guarantee a hiding after that.

Now, please explain why you think we were lucky again?

[Dameerto]

Sorry chap. I dont check this website very often during the week. I didn't even see your last post.

City were lucky to get a draw because, as i said, based on what transpired on the pitch (which means everything including ref decisions, whether they were right or wrong) Liverpool had the better chance to earn all 3 points. And by that i mean the Lallana chance.

If youre going to get into poor refereeing and/or hypotheticals then that is an entirely different argument. I specifically said based on what occurred in the match.

Surely the best chance was Sterling when he was fouled with a tap in in 6 yard box there for him. Poor referring is not a different argument at all in this case.

Sterling had his foot kicked away from the ball as he was about to tap it in (didn't see it myself in realtime, only when Souness pointed it out and they replayed it at halftime) - KDB hit the upright - I'd say both of those were better chances than an average player making an unforced error. He was probably thinking of his next Nivea pay cheque when he missed.

[Saul Goodman]

Sorry chap. I dont check this website very often during the week. I didn't even see your last post.

City were lucky to get a draw because, as i said, based on what transpired on the pitch (which means everything including ref decisions, whether they were right or wrong) Liverpool had the better chance to earn all 3 points. And by that i mean the Lallana chance.

If youre going to get into poor refereeing and/or hypotheticals then that is an entirely different argument. I specifically said based on what occurred in the match.

Surely the best chance was Sterling when he was fouled with a tap in in 6 yard box there for him. Poor referring is not a different argument at all in this case.

Re-read both of my posts, man.

[Saul Goodman]

No, I don't get your opinion on this at all saul goodman.

Include the fact that we should have had a penalty and they would have been down to ten men and you could all but guarantee a hiding after that

Well you dont understand my opinion and I don't understand yours. Guess that's that.

And there you go again with hypotheticals. Shoudlve had a penalty. Wouldve been a hiding.
My post clearly and plainly stated based on what happened on the pitch. On the pitch the penalty wasnt given. On the pitch they had 11 men.

[Michael Brookes]

I understand pal, that's why the majority of us were not too down hearted when the final whistle blew... Despite the poor decisions for penalties against us Liverpool could very much have won that game under the same constraints

[Justified logic]

Sorry chap. I dont check this website very often during the week. I didn't even see your last post.

City were lucky to get a draw because, as i said, based on what transpired on the pitch (which means everything including ref decisions, whether they were right or wrong) Liverpool had the better chance to earn all 3 points. And by that i mean the Lallana chance.

If youre going to get into poor refereeing and/or hypotheticals then that is an entirely different argument. I specifically said based on what occurred in the match.

Surely the best chance was Sterling when he was fouled with a tap in in 6 yard box there for him. Poor referring is not a different argument at all in this case.

Re-read both of my posts, man.

But yours is a hypothetical as well: "better chance [Lallana's] to earn all 3 points".

A goal scored at any time during the match would have changed the game from then on. As Aguero's chance was the last good one of the game, City were unlucky to not go into the final minutes with a 2-1 lead. What would have happened after that would also be hypothetical - for instance, Liverpool may have scored two quick goals and won 2-3.