Rag_hater wrote:Ted Hughes wrote:]
]
So if you pay for that stuff which things do you switch off, the shows with women on ?
The stuff with women on I like.However what floats my boat is not the point I am trying to make.What I am trying to say in my idiotic way is that I feel people have the choice as to whether they want to watch it or not.If people think they are going to get some informed and unbiased opinions on that show then I think they are being a bit naive.
If you cannot take any criticism about us then don't watch.
Nobody is perfect.That much I do know
There are actually one or two unbiased & informed opinions on that show. It really shows up the others for the biased, clueless, bitter, wankers that they are.
Since plumbing the depths of hatred last year, many of the gutter journos on there have now shuffled their positions regarding City, as their constant criticisms were so hopelessly out of touch with reason & reality that they were making fools of themselves on a daily basis. Lawrenson, Merson & Co have been forced to do similar. One or two, like Smith, hold on to their bitter hatred but some now give us begrudging compliments; they just try to keep it down to a minimum. Make no mistake; they are waiting to pounce & stick the knife back in, 1st chance they get.
They still go into an avid wankfest over their favourites, Utd, Harry etc whenever possible though.
It's good to monitor these people, pick up the tone of their arguments & put a face to the stories; then you know when you read reports in the future, which ones are likely to contain a grain of truth & which are likely to have an agenda or be anti City or pro rag propaganda. For instance If Martin Samuel says City's dressing room is falling apart, it's time to worry, but if Oliver Holt says the same, he's probably just trying to stir shit in order to help Utd.