Page 18 of 20

Re: ***whu v pep's city official match thread***

PostPosted: Wed Feb 01, 2017 10:21 pm
by iwasthere2012
branny wrote:
freshie wrote:
branny wrote:
stevefromdonny wrote:FUCK ME WEBB SAYS IT WONT A PEN, EVERYBODY JOINING US NOW


I'd rather the useless, incompetent arse holes give the ones that ARE penalties than giving soft ones when we 're three up.


It was by no means soft


Haven't seen it. Was it stonewall and Webb is being a dick?

Was a definite penalty and Webb said so.

He was just adding that it looked like Sterling at first tried to stay on his feet but maybe after the experience the other week against Spurs, decided it's best stay down.

Personally I think Raheem tried to play on but was so far off balance, he simply couldn't.

There was absolutely no doubt about the penalty.

Re: ***whu v pep's city official match thread***

PostPosted: Wed Feb 01, 2017 10:23 pm
by Peter Doherty (AGAIG)
City64 wrote:Strongest City team I have seen in quite a while ! and that fucking bench .............. WOW !

Ps watching the game in a village sports bar full of plastic bin dippers and plastic rags in a village in Wigan ........ oh my days !

come on city !

Agree on the strength of the bench. I'm giddy again after that performance (on the back of the last two)!

Re: ***whu v pep's city official match thread***

PostPosted: Wed Feb 01, 2017 10:44 pm
by Hutch's Shoulder
A damn good night

Re: ***whu v pep's city official match thread***

PostPosted: Wed Feb 01, 2017 10:52 pm
by City64
Peter Doherty (AGAIG) wrote:
City64 wrote:Strongest City team I have seen in quite a while ! and that fucking bench .............. WOW !

Ps watching the game in a village sports bar full of plastic bin dippers and plastic rags in a village in Wigan ........ oh my days !

come on city !

Agree on the strength of the bench. I'm giddy again after that performance (on the back of the last two)!


Looking forward now to sunday even though a shite 12.30 KO . We are looking sensational again !

Re: ***whu v pep's city official match thread***

PostPosted: Wed Feb 01, 2017 10:59 pm
by PeterParker
I did not see the game, but how was Big Will?

Any problems?

Re: ***whu v pep's city official match thread***

PostPosted: Wed Feb 01, 2017 11:03 pm
by Peter Doherty (AGAIG)
PeterParker wrote:I did not see the game, but how was Big Will?

Any problems?

He had a dandruff-free evening.

Re: ***whu v pep's city official match thread***

PostPosted: Wed Feb 01, 2017 11:06 pm
by City64
PeterParker wrote:I did not see the game, but how was Big Will?

Any problems?

1000% better than Bravo nuff said :lol:

Re: ***whu v pep's city official match thread***

PostPosted: Wed Feb 01, 2017 11:09 pm
by Sister of fu
PeterParker wrote:I did not see the game, but how was Big Will?

Any problems?



Was very verbal and looked like someone who desperately wanting to keep his shirt. Solid.

Re: ***whu v pep's city official match thread***

PostPosted: Wed Feb 01, 2017 11:18 pm
by Beefymcfc
It's coming together, isn't it?

Re: ***whu v pep's city official match thread***

PostPosted: Wed Feb 01, 2017 11:19 pm
by iwasthere2012
Sister of fu wrote:
PeterParker wrote:I did not see the game, but how was Big Will?

Any problems?



Was very verbal and looked like someone who desperately wanting to keep his shirt. Solid.

And coped very well with the back passes.

Re: ***whu v pep's city official match thread***

PostPosted: Wed Feb 01, 2017 11:23 pm
by Hutch's Shoulder
iwasthere2012 wrote:
Sister of fu wrote:
PeterParker wrote:I did not see the game, but how was Big Will?

Any problems?



Was very verbal and looked like someone who desperately wanting to keep his shirt. Solid.

And coped very well with the back passes.


He played short when he could and wasnt afraid to launch it when necessary.

If someone had said before the league cup final last year that a day would come when we would be relieved and feel more confident when Willy was selected ahead of our number one keeper....

Re: ***whu v pep's city official match thread***

PostPosted: Wed Feb 01, 2017 11:38 pm
by s1ty m
Imperious.

Re: ***whu v pep's city official match thread***

PostPosted: Wed Feb 01, 2017 11:52 pm
by Douglas Higginbottom
Twosips tweeted at half time that it was like watching the under 18's. I think he was about right.

Control of the game with good possession, good movement, good pace, good skill on the ball, good finishing as well tonight although as we cut them open so well they were not difficult finishes were they. Absolute pleasure to watch.

Re: ***whu v pep's city official match thread***

PostPosted: Thu Feb 02, 2017 12:17 am
by Moonchesteri
iwasthere2012 wrote:
branny wrote:
freshie wrote:
branny wrote:
stevefromdonny wrote:FUCK ME WEBB SAYS IT WONT A PEN, EVERYBODY JOINING US NOW


I'd rather the useless, incompetent arse holes give the ones that ARE penalties than giving soft ones when we 're three up.


It was by no means soft


Haven't seen it. Was it stonewall and Webb is being a dick?

Was a definite penalty and Webb said so.

He was just adding that it looked like Sterling at first tried to stay on his feet but maybe after the experience the other week against Spurs, decided it's best stay down.

Personally I think Raheem tried to play on but was so far off balance, he simply couldn't.

There was absolutely no doubt about the penalty.


I think that's bollocks and you're just looking at it through sky blue glasses pal

Nailed on penalty tho

Re: ***whu v pep's city official match thread***

PostPosted: Thu Feb 02, 2017 12:17 am
by Pretty Boy Lee
Very pleased with that and also on that performance from Fonte, how good must Van Diyk be to make him look comptotent?

Willy and Jesus were the right calls also.

Re: ***whu v pep's city official match thread***

PostPosted: Thu Feb 02, 2017 12:23 am
by iwasthere2012
Moonchesteri wrote:
I think that's bollocks and you're just looking at it through sky blue glasses pal

Nailed on penalty tho

He was scrambling practically horizontal when he gave up the ghost.

Re: ***whu v pep's city official match thread***

PostPosted: Thu Feb 02, 2017 12:27 am
by freshie
PeterParker wrote:I did not see the game, but how was Big Will?

Any problems?


None whatosever. By no means a world beater but compared to Bravo he probably is. Gave the defence some much needed composure and confidence and the fact that he actually communicates with his back 4, comes for the ball, and makes saves makes him look world class compared to Bravo. Perhaps the penny has finally dropped with Pep and he will stop being so stubborn, as it seems as though he is starting to accept that he has made mistakes, and it is probably the first time in his managerial career that he has made so many. He said that he came to England to learn - I hope that he is now humble enough to do so

Re: ***whu v pep's city official match thread***

PostPosted: Thu Feb 02, 2017 12:29 am
by freshie
Moonchesteri wrote:
iwasthere2012 wrote:
branny wrote:
freshie wrote:
branny wrote:
I'd rather the useless, incompetent arse holes give the ones that ARE penalties than giving soft ones when we 're three up.


It was by no means soft


Haven't seen it. Was it stonewall and Webb is being a dick?

Was a definite penalty and Webb said so.

He was just adding that it looked like Sterling at first tried to stay on his feet but maybe after the experience the other week against Spurs, decided it's best stay down.

Personally I think Raheem tried to play on but was so far off balance, he simply couldn't.

There was absolutely no doubt about the penalty.


I think that's bollocks and you're just looking at it through sky blue glasses pal

Nailed on penalty tho


No, I think IWT2012 is spot on with his judgment of the scenario. If you were being sarcastic then that's gone way over my head

Re: ***whu v pep's city official match thread***

PostPosted: Thu Feb 02, 2017 12:37 am
by Moonchesteri
I'll need to see a replay of that then it just seemed to me as if he could've stayed on his feet but as said foul 100% nonetheless and who really cares lol

Re: ***whu v pep's city official match thread***

PostPosted: Thu Feb 02, 2017 12:56 am
by freshie
Moonchesteri wrote:I'll need to see a replay of that then it just seemed to me as if he could've stayed on his feet but as said foul 100% nonetheless and who really cares lol


To his credit he tried to stay on his feet but the initial foul caused him to lose his balance to such an extent that had he even been capable of doing so would have got no reward for it. I genuinely believe he tried to but the first challenge was a foul and it was no doubt a penalty, therefore why even bother trying to stay on his feet, especially when he got no reward for doing so against Spuds.